Climate Change Is Extremely Political And Agenda Serving, Unfortunately It Is Also True

[Sparks]

1 hour ago, JohnR7 said:

14And God said, “Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, 15and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so. 16God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, 18to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day. (Genesis 1)

There are 31 verses in Genesis chapter one. I count 6 verses that God gives us for a "dating method". We know when Adam and Eve lived in Eden. We know when Noah's flood was. Even we know when Jesus went to Calvary, and gave Himself for us. 

Proverbs 4:18 "But the path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day."

God has impressed it upon me many times that His Justice is accurate and precise.   Just as accurate and precise as our fine tuned universe. But if you want to try to figure out random theory, then go right ahead with that. There are a lot of factors to be taken into consideration, so there is a wobble effect to the solar system to be sure. 

Random motion is defined as the motion of an object with no specific path. It is a type of motion in which the direction and speed of an object change continuously.

Not sure of your point here, but hopefully you realize that a bunch of people who agree about Pangaea, that speculate Florida looked different '14,000 years ago,' and 'Climate Change is a danger' is not science.  Opinions and theories are not science.  Smart people that are in consensus is not science.

Congratulations on your discovery! 

[JohnR7]

3 hours ago, Sparks said:

Not sure of your point here, but hopefully you realize that a bunch of people who agree about Pangaea, that speculate Florida looked different '14,000 years ago,' and 'Climate Change is a danger' is not science.  Opinions and theories are not science.  Smart people that are in consensus is not science.

Congratulations on your discovery! 

I thought it was the coal minors that wanted to go back to work and sell dirty fossil fuel that claimed there is no global warming.  Or them wimpy guys who like to drive those big gas hog pickup trucks that do not believe. 

You have failed to show any evidence, even though I have given you a pick up truck load of evidence. You still want to continue to drive that big truck with big tires that has no payload and nothing to contribute toward what that empty truck cost. 

Are these the "smart" people you are talking about? No degrees, no education, no evidence. 

 

 

[Sparks]

26 minutes ago, JohnR7 said:

I thought it was the coal minors that wanted to go back to work and sell dirty fossil fuel that claimed there is no global warming.  Or them wimpy guys who like to drive those big gas hog pickup trucks that do not believe. 

You have failed to show any evidence, even though I have given you a pick up truck load of evidence. You still want to continue to drive that big truck with big tires that has no payload and nothing to contribute toward what that empty truck cost. 

Are these the "smart" people you are talking about? No degrees, no education, no evidence.

There is no evidence for Global Warming, and now Climate Change.  If you are gullible enough to believe the main stream media when they tell you there is a problem, then I hope you are also gullible enough to send your entire wallet to Al Gore to save the planet.  He could use the money. 

Remember, according to Al and the IPCC, Florida should have been under water by 2016.  You might want to go down to the coast of Florida and keep an eye out for the sudden under water event.   You and the liberals can hold a beach-side vigil and can warn us all when the tide changes by as much as 1 inch. 

Meanwhile the weather satellites and weather buoys say nothing is going on while Al himself uses 34 times more than the average family does on electricity, as an example.  You, yourself, could not use as much electricity in 21 years.

Al Gore’s Home Devours 34 Times More Electricity Than Average U.S. Household

 

[JohnR7]

17 minutes ago, Sparks said:

There is no evidence for Global Warming, and now Climate Change. 

They dispute the evidence for the last 100 years. There has been fire damage in California and Flood damage in Florida. Some people believe this is due to global warming. It does not matter what has happened recently. There is overwhelming evidence that there has been a lot of flooding worldwide in the last 11,500 years from the glaciers melting and the ocean level rising. This is slow and gradual over time. So slow that people even dispute that this is still going on today. 

It does not affect us here in the Great lakes because the lakes are higher than the ocean, so we can just drain them off and send the problem somewhere else. People do not realize that they "turn off Falls" at night because they divert the water to use to generate electric. 

Water flowing over the American Falls and Canadian Horseshoe Falls is greatly reduced at night for power generation purposes.

 

 

Edited October 27, 2022 by JohnR7

[Sparks]

1 hour ago, JohnR7 said:

They dispute the evidence for the last 100 years.

Whoever 'they' is happens to be right because there is no evidence for Global Cooling (failed), Global Warming (failed), and Global Climate Change (counts everything as a man made disaster).

If you want to be gullible, feel free, but be sure to pay your climate foot print tax, because Global Climate Change is scared of that tax, and will hide when you pay Al Gore.  

Only Al can save us from the climate by charging you a fee. 

[JohnR7]

3 hours ago, Sparks said:

Whoever 'they' is happens to be right because there is no evidence for Global Cooling (failed), Global Warming (failed), and Global Climate Change (counts everything as a man made disaster).

If you want to be gullible, feel free, but be sure to pay your climate foot print tax, because Global Climate Change is scared of that tax, and will hide when you pay Al Gore.  

Only Al can save us from the climate by charging you a fee. 

Al Gore is not a scientist, he is a politician. We all know politicians are liars. Ronald Reagan got elected on the platform that the best government is no government at all. 

You are just as guilty because you twist the truth to serve your agenda, so you are not any different than they are. 

When you judge others, you are really only passing judgement on yourself. 

Al Gore is just peddling his books to make a living. Most people cannot find honest work, so they have to resort to something dishonest. 

He came very close to being our president. 

Edited October 27, 2022 by JohnR7

[JohnR7]

4 hours ago, Sparks said:

If you are gullible enough to believe the main stream media

I do not believe main stream media, and I do not believe you. Science leaves a lot to be desired, but they test their hypotheses to see if there is anything valid in them. If you want to attack the media or if you want to attack politicians, then go at it. The problem is when you attack Science because the politicians, media & religion misrepresents science. 

[Sparks]

57 minutes ago, JohnR7 said:

You are just as guilty because you twist the truth to serve your agenda, so you are not any different than they are.

How have I twisted the truth?

50 minutes ago, JohnR7 said:

I do not believe main stream media, and I do not believe you.

Why quote them if you don't believe them?  You are parroting them. 

[David1701]

22 hours ago, BeyondET said:

Britian started running out of trees in 1700's way before WWI

We had far more in the 1700s than we have now, although there has been some significant tree planting, in the last 15/20 years.

[JohnR7]

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

How have I twisted the truth?

Why quote them if you don't believe them?  You are parroting them. 

There is a difference between media and peer reviewed Journals. My dad was a doctor so I grew up reading articles in his medical journals. Other than the newspaper, that was all he read to keep up with all the latest medical discoveries. 

Also, we are talking about a High School Biology book, which you seem to take issue with. Although in this state students are tested and if they can not pass the test they do not get a High School diploma. As a doctor, my dad actually had 32 degrees and diplomas. I still have them, but a lot of his stuff we donated to the Historical Society. 

So I offer you the expert witness of PhDs, yet you fail to function at a high school level of understanding. They have at least 8 years MORE education than you have. Yet you think you know more than they do. How is it in the three minutes you have devoted to this, you have learned more than a professional that has studied for 8 years?