The AI Bible

[Michael37]

13 minutes ago, Indentured Servant said:

Have you heard of any specific bible translation completed solely with AI?

Sort of. AI will interpret anything you give it, including the Bible.

Where AI And The Bible Meet

[Indentured Servant]

1 minute ago, Michael37 said:

Sort of. AI will interpret anything you give it, including the Bible.

Where AI And The Bible Meet

I'll look into it. Thanks.

[Indentured Servant]

6 minutes ago, Sparks said:

You had made a statement about the Bible having personal interpretations.  All I did was ask you to provide one.  I don't think there are any, but you made a statement like you see them and were maybe hoping for an unbiased opinion that only AI could give.  If you don't see them, then there is nothing to debate.

I mean no offense by it, but your statement suggested there were problems with the translations.

I only meant that IF such an AI generated bible or commentary existed, I'd hope that it wouldn't be affected by human bias. The fact that there are differences, debates, and divisions over translations shows there is such personal interpretation that exists.

If there were no problems with translations, then why don't they all say the same thing? If you don't see that as an issue, then, for you, it isn't.

If there were no personal interpretations, then every preacher preaching on the same passage of scripture would say the same thing.

But that wasn't my question.

 

[Sparks]

26 minutes ago, Indentured Servant said:

If there were no problems with translations, then why don't they all say the same thing? If you don't see that as an issue, then, for you, it isn't.

Languages evolve quickly, but you can still look at the original languages that Bibles were translated from.  You can also look at very accurate translations into English called literal translations, these translations are all quoting John 1:1, so they were originally written in Greek.

Young's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

Berean Literal Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Literal Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

Smith's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word.

Literal Emphasis Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word.

Other translations are word-for-word, and some are thought-for-thought and many are from different eras, but they are based on the same texts and those languages are still spoken today.  I had specifically asked you about the King James version. 

King James Bible (1611)
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

[Indentured Servant]

17 hours ago, Sparks said:

I had specifically asked you about the King James version. 

Are you able to start a KJV poll on another thread?

This topic was a simple question about AI application to scripture.

I was seeking information about the bible and AI. 

AI is used quite a bit by bible teachers, but I was seeking information about AI interpretation of scripture.

I was really focused on AI, not KJV.

Do you know anything about how AI is used to translate and/or interpret scripture. 

It is a fascinating topic, those whole AI and bible translation.

What do you think about AI, the topic of this thread, and its application to biblical translation?

You obviously are determined to take a small fraction of what my post asked about AI and the bible and change this conversation to KJV, even to the point of challenging me on your topic. Please don't do that. This was my topic and I will not bow to your need to challenge me on a completely separate topic.

AI & the Bible. I will not discuss anything else that does not fit into this topic. You are very diligent in trying to make this about KJV, and that makes me very suspicious of you. I feel like I'm targeted for being proselytized.

 

[Sparks]

4 hours ago, Indentured Servant said:

AI & the Bible. I will not discuss anything else that does not fit into this topic. You are very diligent in trying to make this about KJV, and that makes me very suspicious of you. I feel like I'm targeted for being proselytized.

I was asking you to back a claim you made about the Bible being 'personally interpreted' by translators, as if the Bible is subjective.   It appears you cannot back your claim, so by all means, discuss whatever you like. 

I deal with AI a lot, to answer your question.  You already had a reply from an AI in this thread about the Bible and AI, if you are not already aware of it.  

Carry on ...

[angels4u]

On 11/14/2024 at 12:35 PM, Indentured Servant said:

Are you able to start a KJV poll on another thread?

This topic was a simple question about AI application to scripture.

I was seeking information about the bible and AI. 

AI is used quite a bit by bible teachers, but I was seeking information about AI interpretation of scripture.

I was really focused on AI, not KJV.

Do you know anything about how AI is used to translate and/or interpret scripture. 

It is a fascinating topic, those whole AI and bible translation.

What do you think about AI, the topic of this thread, and its application to biblical translation?

You obviously are determined to take a small fraction of what my post asked about AI and the bible and change this conversation to KJV, even to the point of challenging me on your topic. Please don't do that. This was my topic and I will not bow to your need to challenge me on a completely separate topic.

AI & the Bible. I will not discuss anything else that does not fit into this topic. You are very diligent in trying to make this about KJV, and that makes me very suspicious of you. I feel like I'm targeted for being proselytized.

 

He's not trying to make it all about AI.

I wouldn't trust AI translations,would you go to a church where you get a AI sermons like I think it was in Germany?

Maybe there will be someday an AI Bible commentary also ,but one thing is sure the people on the top want to rewrite the Bible,I would think they will use some A.I. program and we will not recognize the Bible as they will change words add or keep out which is written a long time ago,we're in the days where we were told to be careful and not to be deceived..   ( As it was in the days of Noah..

 

[angels4u]

Why would we want an A.I. Bible which is not human? 

Will it translate by what sounds right and feels good?

Has A.I. proven itself trust worthy?

Becare not to de deceived by the words of a machine..

 

[other one]

If AI had learned Hebrew and Greek and had learned detailed history of the time periods the Bible was pinned, it might be interesting to read.

[Michael37]

On 11/15/2024 at 5:35 AM, Indentured Servant said:

This topic was a simple question about AI application to scripture.

I was seeking information about the bible and AI. 

AI is used quite a bit by bible teachers, but I was seeking information about AI interpretation of scripture.

Me: Can you generate your own interpretation of the Book of Jude without it being a copy of existing versions?

Copilot: Absolutely, I can provide an interpretation of the Book of Jude that is unique and not a copy of existing versions. Here’s a fresh take on its themes and messages:

The Book of Jude: A Contemporary Interpretation

The Book of Jude, though brief, is a powerful epistle that addresses the challenges faced by early Christians. It serves as a warning against false teachings and a call to remain steadfast in faith.

Introduction and Purpose

Jude, identified as a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James, writes to believers with a sense of urgency. He initially intended to write about the shared salvation but felt compelled to address the pressing issue of false teachers infiltrating the community.

Warning Against False Teachers

Jude warns against individuals who distort the grace of God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ. These false teachers are compared to various negative examples from history and nature, such as:

- Cain: Symbolizing jealousy and murder.
- Balaam: Representing greed and leading others into sin.
- Korah: Illustrating rebellion against divine authority.

Call to Perseverance

Despite the presence of these corrupt influences, Jude encourages believers to build themselves up in their most holy faith, pray in the Holy Spirit, and keep themselves in God’s love. He emphasizes the importance of mercy, urging them to show compassion to those who doubt and to rescue others from the fire of judgment.

Doxology

The epistle concludes with a doxology, praising God’s ability to keep believers from stumbling and to present them blameless before His glorious presence with great joy. This doxology serves as a reminder of God’s power and faithfulness.

Conclusion

The Book of Jude remains relevant today as it addresses the timeless issues of false teachings and the need for vigilance in faith. It calls believers to remain steadfast, show mercy, and trust in God’s sustaining power.

I hope this interpretation provides a fresh perspective on the Book of Jude. If you have any specific aspects you'd like to delve deeper into, feel free to let me know! [Copilot]