Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  45
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  819
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
This is the worst mess this country has been in since my grandparent's time.

When was your grandparents time?

My grandma was born in 1925 so it must have been in the 1930s.....when they were young. I remember them talking about it and it sounded like they were describing some other world. I didn't understand it until I grew up and read about it.

So they don't feel that the era of the Carter administration is worse than today? Higher unemployment, higher inflation, higher interest, and gas shortages all over the country?

I'd be curious to know. I was about 10-15 during those years. I remember my dad buying gas on certain days depending on whether your license plate ended with an odd or even number.

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  173
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  3,911
  • Content Per Day:  0.62
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  03/21/2008
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
My grandma was born in 1925 so it must have been in the 1930s.....when they were young. I remember them talking about it and it sounded like they were describing some other world. I didn't understand it until I grew up and read about it.

So they don't feel that the era of the Carter administration is worse than today? Higher unemployment, higher inflation, higher interest, and gas shortages all over the country?

I'd be curious to know. I was about 10-15 during those years. I remember my dad buying gas on certain days depending on whether your license plate ended with an odd or even number.

Are you saying your were that old in the 20's and 30's or during the Carter adm.? My parents were born right before the depression started but thats all they remember growing up. Each one of them view it differently, my mom says it taught her to be grateful for everyday and everything she had, my dad on the other hand saw it as horrible and dwelt on the water gravy his mom made them eat. The vast difference I see is my mom came up in a christian home my dad did not. I remember the long lines of gas in the 60's and the prices in the 70's. Neither of my parents saw that time nor now anywhere near what the depression was but as my mom said the other day its just starting and she feels its going to be much worse this time around.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,153
  • Content Per Day:  0.32
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1985

Posted
I'm saying that at some point you have to recognize that acts a person committed almost 40 years ago don't mean that we as a people need to completely ostracize them and everything they do. Ayers isn't a "good guy" when you look at his past. But at some point we have to put the past behind us and focus on the present instead of holding grudges.

Hamburgers - let me ask you - do you know what life was like before microwave ovens?

Yes, I do have a point to make here with this question.

We live in a popcorn society - instant gratification today, throw away tomorrow.

Ever notice how yesterday's headline is "old news"? It doesn't matter that yesterday's news has an impact even still today - it's still considered "the past".

When I read your comment above, I could not help but think on this.

Yes, it does matter what a man did 40 years ago. After all, why keep a man in jail for 60 years (if he lives that long)?

In the eyes of God, as we read in the Bible, a man's deeds are not forgotten until he repents of his deeds. Repentance is not just lip service. Repentance means a reversal of what was done. Repentance means, if possible, one makes amends for what was done.

A good example would be in the movie Shawshank Redemption. When Morgan Freeman's character went for his parole hearing near the beginning of the movie, he was playing lip service to being reformed. Towards the end of the movie at his parole hearing, he expressed a true change of heart. Did you see the movie, and could you tell the difference?

So, when I hear the comments from Ayers, I do not hear repentance nor a change of heart. That is the difference.

I hope one day you will understand.

And once again, I'm not claiming that Ayers is a good person. I am claiming that when someone hasn't committed a crime for almost 40 years, and is doing work for the state its ok to associate with him without making you some sort of sympathizer.

Say someone killed someone out of road rage 35 years ago, and is now a business executive. Does my interaction with that person make me a sympathizer to his actions of the past? Not at all, the issues are completely separate.

Posted
Say someone killed someone out of road rage 35 years ago, and is now a business executive. Does my interaction with that person make me a sympathizer to his actions of the past? Not at all, the issues are completely separate.

Hold the pickles!!!!!

Surely you can recognize the difference between a crime of passion (ie road rage) and a premeditated effort to overthrow a government without regard for who dies in the process?

What do you think about the Weather Underground sitting around deciding how they would kill 25 million people who opposed them? Actually Ayers wife, Bernadine Dohrn, is even more dangerous than he is. Bill Ayers didn't make the FBI Top Ten but his wife was on that list for many years.

Honestly, I think you've allowed yourself to be removed from reality while making this judgement. There is just no way I would ever partner for 3 minutes with such people on anything.

Much less 3 years....

Posted
You claim to be a Christian, correct?

no, she doesn't. for that reason, I think she deserves more slack than someone who does.

'Scuse me? :laugh:

I'm a Christian. A Catholic, to be specific.

My bad.

I thought the question was about "Oh Hamburgers" who lists herself as "nonbeliever"

...but I wonder about you!!! :whistling: (just kidding)

Guest shiloh357
Posted
And once again, I'm not claiming that Ayers is a good person. I am claiming that when someone hasn't committed a crime for almost 40 years, and is doing work for the state its ok to associate with him without making you some sort of sympathizer.

Say someone killed someone out of road rage 35 years ago, and is now a business executive. Does my interaction with that person make me a sympathizer to his actions of the past? Not at all, the issues are completely separate.

That doesn't wash, Hamburgers. You are comparing two disimilar things.

Ayer didn't simply commit "a crime." We are not talking about some misdemeanor or a felonly committed while he was still a juvenile. We are talking about a man who consciously plotted (however futile his ambition was) to overthrow the US government and not only escaped justice for his crimes, but has left a victims in his wake to whom he has never offered or made full restitution. He has never repented of is crimes, nor expressed regret over the values he possessed that drove him to such an insane agenda.

Could you associate yourself with someone who for all you know, continues to hold the same type of values that he had before when he committed such crimes?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
And once again, I'm not claiming that Ayers is a good person. I am claiming that when someone hasn't committed a crime for almost 40 years, and is doing work for the state its ok to associate with him without making you some sort of sympathizer.

Say someone killed someone out of road rage 35 years ago, and is now a business executive. Does my interaction with that person make me a sympathizer to his actions of the past? Not at all, the issues are completely separate.

I'd like for you to imagine something for a little bit.

Suppose that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols had gotten off.

Imagine either one of them decades later working for the state, like Ayers.

Would you have no problem working beside them? Would you think nothing of those working with or under them?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  5.73
  • Reputation:   9,978
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
This is the worst mess this country has been in since my grandparent's time.

When was your grandparents time?

My grandma was born in 1925 so it must have been in the 1930s.....when they were young. I remember them talking about it and it sounded like they were describing some other world. I didn't understand it until I grew up and read about it.

So they don't feel that the era of the Carter administration is worse than today? Higher unemployment, higher inflation, higher interest, and gas shortages all over the country?

I'd be curious to know. I was about 10-15 during those years. I remember my dad buying gas on certain days depending on whether your license plate ended with an odd or even number.

I'm not sure how they felt about the Carter years...they have both long since passed on. I was twelve when Carter took office and, truthfully, I don't remember much about that time. Too busy being a kid, I guess. :thumbsup:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,153
  • Content Per Day:  0.32
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  02/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1985

Posted (edited)
And once again, I'm not claiming that Ayers is a good person. I am claiming that when someone hasn't committed a crime for almost 40 years, and is doing work for the state its ok to associate with him without making you some sort of sympathizer.

Say someone killed someone out of road rage 35 years ago, and is now a business executive. Does my interaction with that person make me a sympathizer to his actions of the past? Not at all, the issues are completely separate.

I'd like for you to imagine something for a little bit.

Suppose that Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols had gotten off.

Imagine either one of them decades later working for the state, like Ayers.

Would you have no problem working beside them? Would you think nothing of those working with or under them?

In a work setting, after years proven to be dedicated to their work, I would work with them, and I wouldn't have a problem with it. Because it doesn't matter what they had done in their past, it would only matter what they were planning to do in the future as far as work is concerned. I certainly wouldn't be best pals with them, but I believe myself to be professional enough to look beyond that for the sake of getting things done.

Edited by Oh Hamburgers!
Posted
In a work setting, after years proven to be dedicated to their work, I would work with them, and I wouldn't have a problem with it.

Since Bill Ayers has recently stated in no uncertain terms that he is unrepentant of bombings during the 70s AND since he attended and spoke at an education Conference in Venezuala with Hugo Chavez just two years ago, (topic of re-educating students on radical socialism actually) I would say that he is "proven to be dedicated to his work" still.

If you have no problem hanging around with a person like that....who also planned the "elimination" of 25 million Americans over coffee, then I'd have to ask "where's the beef?" on your burger.

Do you have any discriminatory standards for whom you will work with?

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...