Bible versions

[Massorite]

The KJV is probably the least accurate. The NRSV and NASB are actually the most accurate as they are literal translations. These are typically used as reference bibles, when you are confused about a scripture's meaning. They can be tough to read as they sentence structure is awkward. The NIV is a literal translation but with the sentence structures modified more for English to make it easier to read. So, it's really the best of both worlds IMO.

The Living Bible and The Message and books like that are NOT translations, they are not intended for bible study. It's more of a devotional type of a book. They are very loose "translations" and based on one person's idea of what the original author is meaning.

At least that's all what I learned in College.

To bad that the collages are responsible for the continuation of many of the falser teachings of the day.

[OneLight]

Ya, I'm aware that The Message is more of a paraphrase than a study Bible. But it's very simple and easy to understand. As far as the 'pagan/gnostic' references in it, that doesn't really surprise me. People fling mud at just about every translation nowadays... But don't worry, I do have God on my side after all, so I'm sure I'll almost instantly recognize if something isn't really the same. (and I have already, I think)

I am glad to hear that you see the errors in The Message! Yet, if you see the errors, I have to wonder why even use it or allow for its promotion? By doing so, we are allowing the New Age thought to enter into our minds and are not following the true word of God. Are we not to protect ourselves from such lies? Another concern is when a new Christian sees one who is considered more mature reading The Message, what message is being stated about this version? I am concerned that they may think to themselves that it has to be OK cause so and so is reading it, being influenced by New Age thoughts and not just His words.

There are so many discussions about which bible is more inline with the original text, when we come across something so far out of line with His word that we should automatically stand against them. If not, then why even worry about it in the first place?

[pokemaughan]

I am glad to hear that you see the errors in The Message! Yet, if you see the errors, I have to wonder why even use it or allow for its promotion? By doing so, we are allowing the New Age thought to enter into our minds and are not following the true word of God. Are we not to protect ourselves from such lies? Another concern is when a new Christian sees one who is considered more mature reading The Message, what message is being stated about this version? I am concerned that they may think to themselves that it has to be OK cause so and so is reading it, being influenced by New Age thoughts and not just His words.

There are so many discussions about which bible is more inline with the original text, when we come across something so far out of line with His word that we should automatically stand against them. If not, then why even worry about it in the first place?

The main reason I read it (and now I read it with my NASB or KJV nearby for reference) is because it's put in words that get to my heart and mind a lot faster. I understand it much better- for example,

KJV Psalm 139:13 "For thou hast possesed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb."

Message Psalm 139:13 "Oh yes, you shaped me first inside, then out; you formed me in my mother's womb."

The Message is written in words that I use when I talk to God myself, so it makes me feel more connected. But again, should I read something that doesn't quite ring right with me, I'll double check it. There are a few verses here and there that aren't as powerful in The Message as they are elsewhere.

But should someone ask me, "What do you think of The Message?" I'd say, "It's great for reading; very simple. But it's studying by any means. It's a paraphrase more than a translation. It's best to read something a little more meaty, substantial, and accurate first... then you'll know what's really written, so when you read The Message, it's easier to understand. I'll also mention that sometimes The Message doesn't hold some of the meanings of verses as well as other translations- which is why it's important to know the good stuff first (KJV, NASB, NKJV, whichever)."

Anyways, God has already used it to get to me and change some of my bad habits. So it's definitely been a plus on my shelf.

[OneLight]

pokemaughan, did you read all of the information on that site?

[EricH]

Most of the translations are dependable. Choose the one that reads best for you

[EricH]

Moved from Worthy Welcome to General Discussion

[pokemaughan]

pokemaughan, did you read all of the information on that site?

I skimmed through it. It just seems to more or less a tabloid pot-shot to me. Conspiracy theories and all that kind of stuff were always pretty silly to me. Especially in regards to the Bible.

[JBagley]

Most of the translations are dependable. Choose the one that reads best for you

I have to agree. I was taught from my family's big NKJV bible, but as I grew up I found that I like the NIV for my own study and learning.

To each their own.

[purpleclothing]

im old fashioned...only KJV for me

[ColleenLovesMischief]

I am a NKJV reader.

Thou Thus ect... tend to confuse me greatly!