Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,194
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   34
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/18/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

But why can,t she stand for election if she wants?

Why can't Spanish-speaking people take the time to learn English?

Our laws and documents are all written in English. A governing official who has has difficulty communicating the language of the written law and documents can create a lot of problems.

And why shouldn't people have a right to vote for if they want?

I missed something - where is it mentioned a legal citizen is being barred from voting?

Sorry vote for "her" (I was posting from my mobile- small keypad big fingers, bad eyes etc). People are denied the right to vote for her despite her being a US citizen.


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,194
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   34
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/18/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Matthiajah you are the one rejecting the right of the people of San Luis to exercise their individual democratic liberties by telling them they can only vote for candidates who conform.

Actually, No! No one has denied her the right to speak Spanish and even teach it to her children in the privacy of her own home. No one has denied anyone the right to Vote.:thumbsup:

..and the serpent was more subtle than any other beast in the field, which the Lord God had made.........

Don't you just love exposition? You're good at this my friend.:thumbsup:

Is Lord God unkind or less than Righteous to demand a standard?:noidea:

That's not what I said. I pointed out that by denying her the right to stand the deny others the opportunity to vote for her. They had elections in the USSR, but you could only vote for thecandidates chosen by party committees.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  5.73
  • Reputation:   9,978
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

That's not what I said. I pointed out that by denying her the right to stand the deny others the opportunity to vote for her. They had elections in the USSR, but you could only vote for thecandidates chosen by party committees.

Let's move the situation to your neighborhood, amor. You have a person attempting to run for office in your district that has only rudimentary English skills but is proficient in German. Do you seriously believe the locals would be best served by her? Would it be unfair in the U.K. to expect an elected official to speak English? :noidea:


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,194
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   34
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/18/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Matthiajah you are the one rejecting the right of the people of San Luis to exercise their individual democratic liberties by telling them they can only vote for candidates who conform.

amor, we have standards set for those who want to run for office. Having a good command of the English language is one of those standards. If someone wants to run for office, they need to meet those standards. It is not a free for all over here.

So democracy can only work if candidates deemed undersirable are excluded from election. As in Animal Farmthe rule seems to be "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others". She may be an inadequate candidate, but it should be for the electorate to decide if they want to elect her, not as in this case a committee summoned by her main political opponent.


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,194
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   34
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/18/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

That's not what I said. I pointed out that by denying her the right to stand the deny others the opportunity to vote for her. They had elections in the USSR, but you could only vote for thecandidates chosen by party committees.

Let's move the situation to your neighborhood, amor. You have a person attempting to run for office in your district that has only rudimentary English skills but is proficient in German. Do you seriously believe the locals would be best served by her? Would it be unfair in the U.K. to expect an elected official to speak English? :noidea:

It would be wrong to deny her the right to stand for office, it would be the choice of me and the other voters in the ward or constituency to decide whether we should vote for her. The pont of democracy is that we choose who represents us, if we screw up we should blame ourselves.

Do you think that we need committees to weed out unacceptable candidates? Do you consider yourself too stupid to make up oyur own mind?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

OK, let me try this again:

But why can,t she stand for election if she wants?

Why can't Spanish-speaking people take the time to learn English?

Our laws and documents are all written in English. A governing official who has has difficulty communicating the language of the written law and documents can create a lot of problems.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

And why shouldn't people have a right to vote for if they want?

I missed something - where is it mentioned a legal citizen is being barred from voting?

Sorry vote for "her" (I was posting from my mobile- small keypad big fingers, bad eyes etc). People are denied the right to vote for her despite her being a US citizen.

It sets a precedence.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  5.73
  • Reputation:   9,978
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

That's not what I said. I pointed out that by denying her the right to stand the deny others the opportunity to vote for her. They had elections in the USSR, but you could only vote for thecandidates chosen by party committees.

Let's move the situation to your neighborhood, amor. You have a person attempting to run for office in your district that has only rudimentary English skills but is proficient in German. Do you seriously believe the locals would be best served by her? Would it be unfair in the U.K. to expect an elected official to speak English? :noidea:

It would be wrong to deny her the right to stand for office, it would be the choice of me and the other voters in the ward or constituency to decide whether we should vote for her. The pont of democracy is that we choose who represents us, if we screw up we should blame ourselves.

Do you think that we need committees to weed out unacceptable candidates? Do you consider yourself too stupid to make up oyur own mind?

No and no....the point here is that the woman can't understand the requirements of the office, or the desires of her would-be voting public, and doesn't meet the criterial to even run, because she is not proficient in English. I would take it a step further (if they left the laws to me) and make an I.Q. test a requirement as well. :rolleyes:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  1,285
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  17,917
  • Content Per Day:  2.16
  • Reputation:   355
  • Days Won:  19
  • Joined:  10/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

OK, let me try this again:

But why can,t she stand for election if she wants?

Why can't Spanish-speaking people take the time to learn English?

Our laws and documents are all written in English. A governing official who has has difficulty communicating the language of the written law and documents can create a lot of problems.

That would be if we lived in a pure Democarcy. We live in a Represenative Republic and the Wisdom of our Founding left us with certain requirements like being a U.S. Citizen to hold office. It would also follow that someone should be able to perform the office with a standard of language skills. Shall we then require that all of the folks including the elctorate that have interaction with her to know Spanish because she can't understand them? How about the local elected Board that will have to deal with her?

How about we take your example to the extreme and elect someone who can't read and write?:P

You're argument stems from your desire to dumb everyone down so that we will all be equal. We will thus all be the poorer and be destroyed by our lack of a standard.

Like I said, "You're real good at what you do.":thumbsup::rolleyes:


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,194
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   34
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/18/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

If people are stupid enough to vote for someone they can't communicate with, surely that is their problem! Do Americans really need comittees of nannies to preselect suitable candidates for office? Do you really think your fellow citizens are too thick to make rational choices?

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...