This is what happens when homosexuality infiltrates a society

[OakWood]

http://news.msn.com/us/judge-rules-kan-sperm-donor-owes-child-support

 

A judge in Kansas ruled a man who donated sperm to a lesbian couple is the father of a child born to the women and must pay child support.

TOPEKA Kansas — A man who provided sperm to a lesbian couple in response to an online ad is the father of a child born to one of the women and must pay child support, a Kansas judge ruled Wednesday.

Topeka resident William Marotta had argued that he had waived his parental rights and didn't intend to be a father. Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi rejected that claim, saying the parties didn't involve a licensed physician in the artificial insemination process and thus Marotta didn't qualify as a sperm donor, The Topeka Capitol Journal reported.

[MrsRational]

http://news.msn.com/us/judge-rules-kan-sperm-donor-owes-child-support

 

A judge in Kansas ruled a man who donated sperm to a lesbian couple is the father of a child born to the women and must pay child support.

TOPEKA Kansas — A man who provided sperm to a lesbian couple in response to an online ad is the father of a child born to one of the women and must pay child support, a Kansas judge ruled Wednesday.

Topeka resident William Marotta had argued that he had waived his parental rights and didn't intend to be a father. Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi rejected that claim, saying the parties didn't involve a licensed physician in the artificial insemination process and thus Marotta didn't qualify as a sperm donor, The Topeka Capitol Journal reported.

 

Yes because if this had been a heterosexual couple the ruling would have been different.

 

Had the guy gone through a clinic like the law requires he wouldn't be in this mess.

Edited January 24, 2014 by MrsRational

[OakWood]

 

http://news.msn.com/us/judge-rules-kan-sperm-donor-owes-child-support

 

A judge in Kansas ruled a man who donated sperm to a lesbian couple is the father of a child born to the women and must pay child support.

TOPEKA Kansas — A man who provided sperm to a lesbian couple in response to an online ad is the father of a child born to one of the women and must pay child support, a Kansas judge ruled Wednesday.

Topeka resident William Marotta had argued that he had waived his parental rights and didn't intend to be a father. Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi rejected that claim, saying the parties didn't involve a licensed physician in the artificial insemination process and thus Marotta didn't qualify as a sperm donor, The Topeka Capitol Journal reported.

 

Yes because if this had been a heterosexual couple the ruling would have been different. (I wish there was an icon for rolling ones eyes)

 

Had the guy gone through a clinic like the law requires he wouldn't be in this mess. 

 

 

Not the same thing. The thing about heterosexual couples is that one of them is a man and he would have been responsible for the payment and upbringing of the child, and not the donor.

With Lesbians reproduction is impossible without a donor, so a court has to decide whether or not it was a sperm donation or the result of sexual activity between the man and one of the women, and even if it wasn't, the sperm donation would be invalid if it didn't go through the right medical channels.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

[other one]

 

http://news.msn.com/us/judge-rules-kan-sperm-donor-owes-child-support

 

A judge in Kansas ruled a man who donated sperm to a lesbian couple is the father of a child born to the women and must pay child support.

TOPEKA Kansas — A man who provided sperm to a lesbian couple in response to an online ad is the father of a child born to one of the women and must pay child support, a Kansas judge ruled Wednesday.

Topeka resident William Marotta had argued that he had waived his parental rights and didn't intend to be a father. Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi rejected that claim, saying the parties didn't involve a licensed physician in the artificial insemination process and thus Marotta didn't qualify as a sperm donor, The Topeka Capitol Journal reported.

 

Yes because if this had been a heterosexual couple the ruling would have been different. (I wish there was an icon for rolling ones eyes)

 

Had the guy gone through a clinic like the law requires he wouldn't be in this mess. 

 

    there you go...

[MrsRational]

 

 

http://news.msn.com/us/judge-rules-kan-sperm-donor-owes-child-support

 

A judge in Kansas ruled a man who donated sperm to a lesbian couple is the father of a child born to the women and must pay child support.

TOPEKA Kansas — A man who provided sperm to a lesbian couple in response to an online ad is the father of a child born to one of the women and must pay child support, a Kansas judge ruled Wednesday.

Topeka resident William Marotta had argued that he had waived his parental rights and didn't intend to be a father. Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi rejected that claim, saying the parties didn't involve a licensed physician in the artificial insemination process and thus Marotta didn't qualify as a sperm donor, The Topeka Capitol Journal reported.

 

Yes because if this had been a heterosexual couple the ruling would have been different. (I wish there was an icon for rolling ones eyes)

 

Had the guy gone through a clinic like the law requires he wouldn't be in this mess. 

 

 

Not the same thing. The thing about heterosexual couples is that one of them is a man and he would have been responsible for the payment and upbringing of the child, and not the donor.

With Lesbians reproduction is impossible without a donor, so a court has to decide whether or not it was a sperm donation or the result of sexual activity between the man and one of the women, and even if it wasn't, the sperm donation would be invalid if it didn't go through the right medical channels.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

 

 

In terms of paternity laws it doesn't matter if a baby is the result of sexual intercourse between a husband and wife or two lesbians and a man with a chemistry set. There are certain ways to donate your sperm without having to worry about paternity, and these women's sexual orientation is irrelevant to that process.

Edited January 24, 2014 by MrsRational

[JustinM]

The relationship failed, that's why the "mother" is suing for child support.  She is now a single "mother" and since her ex partner has no legal obligation to care for the child she went after the donor.  This is extortion and institutionalized misandry.

[nebula]

The relationship failed, that's why the "mother" is suing for child support.  She is now a single "mother" and since her ex partner has no legal obligation to care for the child she went after the donor.  This is extortion and institutionalized misandry.

 

Justin makes a good point. Yes, had he gone through a clinic this would not have happened to him. However, this situation highlights the can of worms that has been opened with society's embracing of homosexual relationships - the fate and care of the children.

[MrsRational]

The relationship failed, that's why the "mother" is suing for child support.  She is now a single "mother" and since her ex partner has no legal obligation to care for the child she went after the donor.  This is extortion and institutionalized misandry.

I am reading this story and I don't see where it says her girlfriend/wife left her.

 

Justin makes a good point. Yes, had he gone through a clinic this would not have happened to him. However, this situation highlights the can of worms that has been opened with society's embracing of homosexual relationships - the fate and care of the children.

 

This is only about gay people in the sense that two of the three participants happen to be gay. Since 40 - 50% of marriages now end in divorce the same "issues" could be applied to straight couples as well. There have been thousands upon thousands of cases where dad can't get his wife pregnant, so he brings a man over and leaves him to spend lone time with his wife. Especially in rural areas with little to no access to fertility clinics, and among the poor. Had the fathers in these cases up and left the "donor" would also be legally liable under the law.

 

These women did a crappy thing to the guy and I am not defending their behaviour, however this would not have happened if he had followed the law.

Edited January 24, 2014 by MrsRational

[Guest Butero]

I'll tell you how I would handle this if I were in his place.  I would immediately assert parental rights.  If he has to pay child support, then he has rights.  I would demand visitation, and would then fight for full custody, or whatever I could get and demand child support when the child was in my care.  No Christian would have helped a lesbian couple in that way, so from a purely vindictive way of handling things, I would have the child around people that were the worst homophobes on the planet to turn them against the mother.  The lesbian couple would seriously regret the day they messed with me. 

[MorningGlory]

I'll tell you how I would handle this if I were in his place.  I would immediately assert parental rights.  If he has to pay child support, then he has rights.  I would demand visitation, and would then fight for full custody, or whatever I could get and demand child support when the child was in my care.  No Christian would have helped a lesbian couple in that way, so from a purely vindictive way of handling things, I would have the child around people that were the worst homophobes on the planet to turn them against the mother.  The lesbian couple would seriously regret the day they messed with me. 

 

Wow!  I won't say I disagree, Butero; what the two women did was immature and self-serving.  The man sounds like a complete ditz but maybe he can muster the brain cells to follow your advice.  I feel sorry for the child.