Adams fault??

[creativemechanic]

THANK YOU

[The_Patriot21]

 

 

 

I would say they were both equally at fault. they chose to sin. Makes one wonder if one hadn't eaten while the other had, what would happen.

The are equally at fault, but not equally to blame for the fall.  Adam is solely to blame in the Bible.  Adam as her husband and head, could have interceded for Eve, mostly likely and Eve would have been forgiven. 

 

where is that biblically

 

Which part? 

 

about adam being blamed. and the part where if adam would have interceded, that eve would have been forgiven.

[coheir]

 

 

Gen 3

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

 

3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

 

After reading V3 Im sure she knew; evedently she was told and she was not in the dark on this.

 

But Paul says she was deceived.  So the question is, in what way was she deceived?

 

He may have eaten it in front of her once and he did not die so she may have been convinced she would not either, a guess.

It could be somehow he knew it would not affect him as it would them. another possibiliy he may have eaten  fifty times in front of her before she tried it.

[alien224]

Im with Shiloh again. This is what the bible teaches.

[alien224]

Im with Shiloh again. This is what the bible teaches.

[The_Patriot21]

well then alien, why don't you help shiloh out with the scripture that backs you and him up.

[Guest shiloh357]

 

 

 

 

I would say they were both equally at fault. they chose to sin. Makes one wonder if one hadn't eaten while the other had, what would happen.

The are equally at fault, but not equally to blame for the fall.  Adam is solely to blame in the Bible.  Adam as her husband and head, could have interceded for Eve, mostly likely and Eve would have been forgiven. 

 

where is that biblically

 

Which part? 

 

about adam being blamed.

Roman 5:12-21.  Adam is the ONLY one blamed for the fall of man anywhere in Scripture.   I Tim. 2:13-14 states that when Eve ate of the fruit, she was deceived, but Adam committed that sin with both eyes open.  He knew he was being disobedient.    Also see I Cor. 15:21-22

 

Nowhere in the New Testament where the Fall is mentioned is Eve blamed for it.  Adam is singularly blamed.

 

As for the part about Adam interceding for her, I didn't say that Bible said that.  I only mentioned it as something that could have have happened if Adam had not eaten himself.

[Guest shiloh357]

 

 

 

Gen 3

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

 

3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

 

After reading V3 Im sure she knew; evedently she was told and she was not in the dark on this.

 

But Paul says she was deceived.  So the question is, in what way was she deceived?

 

He may have eaten it in front of her once and he did not die so she may have been convinced she would not either, a guess.

It could be somehow he knew it would not affect him as it would them. another possibiliy he may have eaten  fifty times in front of her before she tried it.

 

No, if He had eaten of it first man would have fallen.  Where do get the idea that he might have eaten first?   Sorry, but nothing in what you said jives with the Bible.

[Guest Teditis]

Eve may have been deceived about what happens after the fruit was eaten but she wasn't deceived about being disobedient to what God had said... she quoted God in this, then followed her own will. As it's said in Timothy, she was in transgression. And Adam did likewise, he followed his own internal desires and ate when he knew it was wrong to...  he just did it with his eyes open. Either way, they both sinned and both were both cursed and expelled from the Garden.

But Eve still had a choice... she chose poorly.

[other one]

 

 

 

 

 

I would say they were both equally at fault. they chose to sin. Makes one wonder if one hadn't eaten while the other had, what would happen.

The are equally at fault, but not equally to blame for the fall.  Adam is solely to blame in the Bible.  Adam as her husband and head, could have interceded for Eve, mostly likely and Eve would have been forgiven. 

 

where is that biblically

 

Which part? 

 

about adam being blamed.

Roman 5:12-21.  Adam is the ONLY one blamed for the fall of man anywhere in Scripture.   I Tim. 2:13-14 states that when Eve ate of the fruit, she was deceived, but Adam committed that sin with both eyes open.  He knew he was being disobedient.    Also see I Cor. 15:21-22

 

Nowhere in the New Testament where the Fall is mentioned is Eve blamed for it.  Adam is singularly blamed.

 

As for the part about Adam interceding for her, I didn't say that Bible said that.  I only mentioned it as something that could have have happened if Adam had not eaten himself.

 

with Eve knowing the difference between good and evil and Adam not knowing, it would have made for a weird relationship.