Connection between Feminism and Communism

[Ezra]

Many Christians may not be aware that there is a direct link between the Women's Liberation Movement and American Communism.
- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/000180.html#sthash.Wn2xraK7.dpuf

Wiegand's Red Feminism: Communism  and the Making of Women's Liberation is a useful reminder that the  transformation of society in our lifetime was inspired by Communist dogma...  

Wiegand said : "ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement of the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women's movement of the 1960s and later."

THE COMMUNIST CHARACTER OF FEMINISM

Feminism's roots in Marxist Communism explain a great deal about this curious but dangerous movement. It explains:

·        Why the " woman's movement" hates femininity and imposes a political-economic concept like "equality" on a personal, biological and mystical relationship. 

·        Why the "women's movement" also embraces "equality" of race and

·        Why they want revolution ("transformation") and have a messianic vision of a gender-less utopia. 

·        Why they believe human nature is infinitely malleable and can be shaped by indoctrination and coercion. 

·        Why they engage in endless, mind-numbing theorizing, doctrinal disputes and factionalism. 

·        Why truth for them is a "social construct" defined by whomever has power, and appearances are more important than reality. 

·        Why they reject God, nature and scientific evidence in favour of their political agenda. 

·        Why they refuse to debate, don't believe in free speech, and suppress dissenting views. 

·        Why they behave like a quasi-religious cult, or like the Red Guard. 

It's hard to escape the conclusion that feminism is Communism by another name. Communism is designed to give power to the puppets of central bankers by fostering division and conflict. Divide and Conquer. Having failed to peddle class and race war, Communism promoted gender conflict instead. In each case they fostered a sense of grievance in the target group. Now the traditional feminine role "oppressed" women.

In spite of this, there are many Christian women who -- like Eve -- have been deceived by Satan into believing that Feminism has something to offer which is above and beyond what God offers women.

[missmuffet]

Well I am not a women's libber and I have never burned my bra so I would not know.

[Esther4:14]

Your talking about such a minority of the women's movement and are using it in such a broad stroke that it is just ridiculous.  You forget how many aspect of the women's movement are no where near this extreme and still get labeled feminist by men trying to still maintain a patriarchal society.  There is absolutely no balance to the information that you present or repentance for the way women have been treated in the past that women have fought to correct and was never something that was in accordance with scripture to begin with.  It is like you would defend women not having the right to vote because you actually believe that scripture somewhere tells you that you have the authority to decide whether I deserve the right to vote.  

Edited October 16, 2015 by Esther4:14

[MorningGlory]

Ezra, I'm going to have to agree with Esther here ( don't faint, Esther! ) because feminism and communism are simply not the same thing.  A woman demanding to be treated and paid equally bears no connection to a Marxist idealogy that enslaves the populace. Be aware that most women are not militant feminists but are just people trying to make their way in the world and want a level playing field. The Patriarchal society she references is OVER, at least in western countries.  And that's good for everyone; even you men.

[missmuffet]

Ezra, I'm going to have to agree with Esther here ( don't faint, Esther! ) because feminism and communism are simply not the same thing.  A woman demanding to be treated and paid equally bears no connection to a Marxist idealogy that enslaves the populace. Be aware that most women are not militant feminists but are just people trying to make their way in the world and want a level playing field. The Patriarchal society she references is OVER, at least in western countries.  And that's good for everyone; even you men.

 I simply do not see the connection.

[MorningGlory]

Ezra, I'm going to have to agree with Esther here ( don't faint, Esther! ) because feminism and communism are simply not the same thing.  A woman demanding to be treated and paid equally bears no connection to a Marxist idealogy that enslaves the populace. Be aware that most women are not militant feminists but are just people trying to make their way in the world and want a level playing field. The Patriarchal society she references is OVER, at least in western countries.  And that's good for everyone; even you men.

 I simply do not see the connection.

That's because there isn't one.  That guy that wrote the article, Wiegand,  is probably just beaten down by a mean wife and wants to whine (behind her back, of course!) 

[missmuffet]

Ezra, I'm going to have to agree with Esther here ( don't faint, Esther! ) because feminism and communism are simply not the same thing.  A woman demanding to be treated and paid equally bears no connection to a Marxist idealogy that enslaves the populace. Be aware that most women are not militant feminists but are just people trying to make their way in the world and want a level playing field. The Patriarchal society she references is OVER, at least in western countries.  And that's good for everyone; even you men.

 I simply do not see the connection.

That's because there isn't one.  That guy that wrote the article, Wiegand,  is probably just beaten down by a mean wife and wants to whine (behind her back, of course!) 

I agree with your statement on this:

"Be aware that most women are not militant feminists but are just people trying to make their way in the world" 

[Esther4:14]

What you are quoting is mere nonsense supporting a modern day men's club trying to shape women into Stepford wives by saying that feminism is a deception from Satan or another faction of communism.  

Many of the women who participated in the rape crisis movement of the 1970's would be considered feminist and many of them did support contraception and abortion.  Because they supported abortion and contraception, this does not mean that pursuing conviction of sexually offenders should be condemned because they could be called feminists.  It means that they did not have support from the church in pursuing these endeavors, which is unfortunate.  Therefore, instead of condemning these women and finding articles that generalize a group of women as communists, it would seem logical and expected for the church to be open and in agreement that women need justice, and deserve justice-especially in cases of sexual assault instead of condemning them as feminists.  It would seem that men would be capable of discerning this if they believe that they are capable of leading within the body of Christ.  

"He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" (Micah 6:8).  

I find it so absolutely offensive that you would generalize that Christian women have been deceived like Eve in the subject of feminism.  This is the beauty of the women's movement that allowed me, a girl, to go to school and learn to read in my lifetime.  I have read the Bible and many other things, so that I am not dependent on such lop sided messages from someone simply because they claim to believe in God.  Without my ability to read, my fear of God might have caused me to listen to this nonsense.  I believe this was the reason the Bible was translated into English to begin with at one time-to protect the church from false teachers and lop sided messages  

There are so many things that I could include that it is difficult to know where to start within the thousands of years of the oppression of women.  

Let's look at a man named John Todd who was a graduate of Yale and a congregational minister in the 19th century.  He said in regard to the right to vote.  "Being a widow, or fatherless, is a misfortune.  But the husband or father earned the property, and voted as long as he lived.  It may be a misfortune that the property does not now vote, but not  so great a misfortune to the world as to have the sex go out of their sphere and enter into political life.  Indeed, it is allowed that voting is only the stepping-stone to civil office.  But it is stepping out of her sphere, and the moment you do that, you pu8t a few of the sex into office, but depress and degrade at least a thousand where you elevate one.  If a few go up, the many go down" (In Her Place: A Documentary History of Prejudice against Women page 35-36).  

"The daughters of Zelophehad speak right: thou shalt surely give them a possession of an inheritance among their father's brethren; and thou shalt cause the inheritance of their father to pass unto them." (Numbers 27:7).  

"A father of the fatherless, and a judge of the widows, is God in his holy habitation." (Psalm 68:5).  

Let's look at what he has to say about a woman and education.  

"For forty years I have been connected with female seminaries, and have carefully watched their training and results.  I say deliberately, that the female has mind enough, talent enough, to go through a complete college course, but her physical organization, as a general thing, will never admit of it.  I think the great danger of our day is forcing the intellect of woman beyond what her physical organization will possibly bear." (p. 38).

"And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:" (Acts 2:17).  

Maybe John Todd is going against scripture trying to say that a woman's physical organization could not bear receiving the Spirit of God in the way this verse suggests.  

Now, the women who gained the right to vote and go to school were the inspiration for many in more recent feminist movement, not Karl Marx.  The ones who stood up to men like John Todd were a big part of the foundation of the movement.  

Now, the question is whether you agree with the unbiblical responses of John Todd and what that says about your argument about a connection between feminism and communism that completely neglects any indication of balance to contribute to the discussion; or, any indication of support for things that were gained outside of the more extreme opinions of the one presented in the article.  In my opinion, if you are that biased on a subject that clearly has so much more to be said about it that can be supported with scripture, then should I really take anything that you say seriously.  

This is also a subject I have 33 years of experience in and many years of research on.  I have much more I could say on the subject, but I will stop there for now.    

Edited October 16, 2015 by Esther4:14

[gdemoss]

The serpent said unto Eve that God was a liar that she would become like God and as a direct result Eve being deceived believed the lie.  The serpent was saying "God is suppressing you!  You should be equal!"

The serpent is still chanting the same montra but this time it isn't God but men who are the evil ones suppressing the woman and holding her back from the equality they so deserve.

The truth is that he is still lying.  

Esther and Morning Glory are right in that any man worth his salt does not lead a woman by being a high chair tyrant dictator.  He does not abuse her by paying her less than a male counterpart for equal work preformed.  

I have not looked into the connection between feminism and communism before.  I can see within our society a sect of dominant women who emasculate men and keep them as little boys under mommas care.  If men never get weaned from the breast then momma always bears rule.  Catholicism has a similar uprising due to the worship of Mary as Mother.  

The trick is to swing the pendullam as far as one can so that it can go the other way.  The overt suppression of women by ungodly men will inadvertantly bring justice and place women over men but this is ungodly and foolish if women to accept for error in the opposite direction is still error.

Satans delight is in confusion and imbalance.

I have absolute rule in my home because I believed God when he said I was to honor her as the weaker vessel, wash her in the water of the word and love her as myself.  I work hard at exercising myself unto godliness and when I understand I am wrong I admit it and make amends.  She is convinced that I love her and that when I correct her it is in love in the fear of God.

All forms of human Government are a direct result of man rejecting God as ruler.  All forms of human government are given to supress man and drive him back to God.  Show me a people who obediently follow God and i'll show you a people who have no governors over them.

[MorningGlory]

The serpent said unto Eve that God was a liar that she would become like God and as a direct result Eve being deceived believed the lie.  The serpent was saying "God is suppressing you!  You should be equal!"

The serpent is still chanting the same montra but this time it isn't God but men who are the evil ones suppressing the woman and holding her back from the equality they so deserve.

The truth is that he is still lying.  

Esther and Morning Glory are right in that any man worth his salt does not lead a woman by being a high chair tyrant dictator.  He does not abuse her by paying her less than a male counterpart for equal work preformed.  

I have not looked into the connection between feminism and communism before.  I can see within our society a sect of dominant women who emasculate men and keep them as little boys under mommas care.  If men never get weaned from the breast then momma always bears rule.  Catholicism has a similar uprising due to the worship of Mary as Mother.  

The trick is to swing the pendullam as far as one can so that it can go the other way.  The overt suppression of women by ungodly men will inadvertantly bring justice and place women over men but this is ungodly and foolish if women to accept for error in the opposite direction is still error.

Satans delight is in confusion and imbalance.

I have absolute rule in my home because I believed God when he said I was to honor her as the weaker vessel, wash her in the water of the word and love her as myself.  I work hard at exercising myself unto godliness and when I understand I am wrong I admit it and make amends.  She is convinced that I love her and that when I correct her it is in love in the fear of God.

All forms of human Government are a direct result of man rejecting God as ruler.  All forms of human government are given to supress man and drive him back to God.  Show me a people who obediently follow God and i'll show you a people who have no governors over them.

From your post, above..:  "I can see within our society a sect of dominant women who emasculate men and keep them as little boys under mommas care."

It occurs to me, just as pure logical thought, that the only men who can be emasculated like this were never very masculine to begin with. IOW, don't be a wimp and you won't be treated like a little boy.  The 'YOU' being a generic you not anyone in particular.