san bernardino massacre ties to isis

[ayin jade]

[The_Patriot21]

Sinner? Do you have any clue what your talking about? Let's look at your posts. If they take away our guns, we can't protect ourselves. You just made our point. If the national gaurd were to step in that would be martial law-what no one wants. If we don't have guns the rest of our rights, be it petition or otherwise, do go away. Thanks for making our point.

 

And where are you going with the whole "blackhawks being replaced by transport helicopters" thing and how that's a bad thing? Hate to break this to you-the blackhawks IS a transport helicopter. It was designed to carry troops into and out of battle, the ability to provide limited fire support is just a bonus, and one that can be added onto any helicopter in existence. If you mean they're replacing the attack helicopters, first off they're not. Second off even if they were to do so they're getting antiquated and not as useful as they used to be anyway.

[The_Patriot21]

1 minute ago, SINNERSAVED said:

Patriot , just can t let it go? I have been nice ,    I will not sling mud for mud , for you make this personal everytime  ,and that is a shame,

I told you your responses    give you away. brother..

Asking you to actually state your opinion isn't slinging mud or making it personal.

[SINNERSAVED]

2 minutes ago, the_patriot2015 said:

Sinner? Do you have any clue what your talking about? Let's look at your posts. If they take away our guns, we can't protect ourselves. You just made our point. If the national gaurd were to step in that would be martial law-what no one wants. If we don't have guns the rest of our rights, be it petition or otherwise, do go away. Thanks for making our point.

 

And where are you going with the whole "blackhawks being replaced by transport helicopters" thing and how that's a bad thing? Hate to break this to you-the blackhawks IS a transport helicopter. It was designed to carry troops into and out of battle, the ability to provide limited fire support is just a bonus, and one that can be added onto any helicopter in existence. If you mean they're replacing the attack helicopters, first off they're not. Second off even if they were to do so they're getting antiquated and not as useful as they used to be anyway.

I like the fast response awesome to a subject you do not know about, but I would like to have the fast verification system you got , or was that just a off the hip shot ?, I know for a fact you did not even check into it , for you seem to already know the answers , genius, I love this, you keep me on my toes , with out even looking up what I said, so I think we see how this works, ,thank you for your information, I will come to you when I need to learn something, thank you,.

[SINNERSAVED]

10 minutes ago, MorningGlory said:

Sorry, SS, the words in bold above are flat out not true.  I live near Ellington Field, in Houston, and yesterday I was at the Conroe Airport about fifty miles from here.  Blackhawks everywhere, just as they always have been.  They do weekly exercises that go right over my house and office also.  And, yes, I do know a Blackhawk when I see one since I've lived here for over twenty years.  I don't know where you got that stuff from.  The National Guard trains right down the road from here and they are very much on the job.

Let me sum it up; yes the PC idiots are running amok.  Yes, the anti-gun lobby is yelling for increased BACKGROUND checks and closing the gun show sales loophole.  There is NO legislation to take away anyone's guns.  And, yes, muslim terrorists are the greatest threat we face.  I can't put it any plainer than that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

you have answered a topic that you did not check out, because you saw them on the air field,,i want you to check me out, for I did not just assume anything, but the answer came in so fast against what I said? that was not nice MG

[Guest shiloh357]

20 minutes ago, SINNERSAVED said:

okay , lets look at it this way, for everytime a shooting goes on , we are told and they want to take your guns away as a citizen and place harder and harder restrictions on you  even  to owning a Gun, the gun grab system is placed like clock work every time, so we see that more and more people are told guns kill people, and we need to enforce stopping people with Guns, this is well documented fact !

 

California and Chicago have the stricktest gun laws in the country.   Chicago has more gun violence than just about anywhere in the country even though they have some of the toughest gun control laws.

The problem is that criminals are lawless.  You can pass laws until you are blue in the face and it won't matter to them, because they will still continue to break those laws.  The only ones who obey the laws, are the 58 million legal gun owners in the US who have killed anybody or committed a crime with a gun.

Guns don't kill people.   If guns kill people then I guess cars drive drunk.   Restricting gun laws because someone uses it to commit a heinous crimes is as stupid as passing car control laws because someone used a car to rob a bank or rammed their car into a group of people.    We don't pass laws against many other things that are used to kill people.

The problem is with people, not guns.  The problem is Islamic radicalization in this case.  The problem is with Islam, not guns.   But liberals want to make it about other issues because they are too stupid to identify the real problem.

Quote

they are being kicked out, for doing that. so I would re examine who is the threat and what we are facing in our country before we see who is coming across the borders, for who knows what shape our borders are in ,

No, we need to look at who is coming across our borders.  Living in the US is privilege, not a right and we need to be way more picky about who let in.  There was a time when immigrants had to prove you had a skill and would be good for the country.  We didn't just let in every low life that crawls across the border.    Our problem is that we are letting in people who mean us harm, and we need a better system and we need to fix the border, like what Israel has in the west bank.  One of the best border fences in the world.

[Guest shiloh357]

5 minutes ago, SINNERSAVED said:

you have answered a topic that you did not check out, because you saw them on the air field,,i want you to check me out, for I did not just assume anything, but the answer came in so fast against what I said? that was not nice MG

You don't have a clue about what you are talking about.  In case you didn't notice, we are not buying what you're saying.  You'r e wrong, and we don't believe you.

[The_Patriot21]

9 minutes ago, SINNERSAVED said:

I like the fast response awesome to a subject you do not know about, but I would like to have the fast verification system you got , or was that just a off the hip shot ?, I know for a fact you did not even check into it , for you seem to already know the answers , genius, I love this, you keep me on my toes , with out even looking up what I said, so I think we see how this works, ,thank you for your information, I will come to you when I need to learn something, thank you,.

Funny, when I ask you to verify what you say (or actually make a point) im the bad guy, but now you expect me to? Alright, fine let me verify this. First off, I dont need to verify that the shootings had terrorist ties-pretty much every legitimate source to date, has been confirming that. And to date, you havent come up with a single piece of evidence against that. So, we have verified, that the attacks in california were terrorists, or at least have more verification then you do. I dont need to take all day to reply to know that.

 

Second, when it comes to helicopters, you yourself has proven you have no clue what your talking about. My proof? right hereL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_UH-60_Black_Hawk 

 

But go ahead, continue telling me that it wasnt terrorists who shot up St. bernandine, because the national Gaurd cant protect us, since theyre replacing their transport helicopters with more transport helicopters. None of your argument so far, has made even a lick of sense, you have zero verification of any of it (no evidence) and so far all ive gotten out of it is "cant be terrorists, and guns are bad" yet you cant back either claim up. But yet, thats just me shooting off the hip without bothering checking into anything....hard to check into something when you wont even tell me what "it" is or even give me any "evidence" of this supposed "it"

[SINNERSAVED]

23 minutes ago, the_patriot2015 said:

 

I see blood in the water,, nice,    this is exciting ,    I had to get some popcorn this is  getting really good,  tell me more brother ?

[MorningGlory]

12 minutes ago, SINNERSAVED said:

you have answered a topic that you did not check out, because you saw them on the air field,,i want you to check me out, for I did not just assume anything, but the answer came in so fast against what I said? that was not nice MG

Check out what?  I see them every day of my life because of where I live.  If it seems fast it's because I only have to drive five miles down I-45 and see the Blackhawks; I do this every day I go to work.  Okay, I have eyewitness verification of what I said; where did you get YOUR information?  I'm really not sure why you get upset every time some one questions you about your statements.