I Thes 5:22

[Guest Butero]

8 hours ago, OldSchool2 said:

... in the KJV?

And we're not talking about pleasing God, but in putting your faith in a translation dating back to 1611, i.e., "bibliolatry."

 

I will use the quote feature to prove you accused me of making an idol out of the KJV Bible.  Here it is.  You started out saying that it is the KJV Bible I am putting my faith in.  

[Guest Butero]

2 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said:

If I eat a rare steak with blood in it am I committing a deadly sin?

Which Testament are you are living in? the Old, or the New?

I am talking about the seven deadly sins of the Catholic Church.  If we violate them, since we are under grace, does that mean we don't have to worry about it, but we will still make it to heaven?  

[simplejeff]

27 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said:

Does it include the New Testament?

TORAH , as recognized today by those abiding in Yeshua,  includes everything that comes forth from Yahweh.

If you want to restrict it to only the first five books of Scripture,  no problem at all - what was forbidden then is still forbidden when Jesus Returns,  and until at least when the universe is melted (as written in the New Testament,  as SPOKEN BY JESUS) ....

[Guest Butero]

3 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said:

If I eat a rare steak with blood in it am I committing a deadly sin?

Which Testament are you are living in? the Old, or the New?

You saw the scripture, and you know full well it says exactly what I said it does.  Personally, I won't eat rare steak.  I cook it until it is nearly burnt so there is no blood, but that is neither here nor there.  

[OldSchool2]

1 minute ago, Butero said:

I will use the quote feature to prove you accused me of making an idol out of the KJV Bible.  Here it is.  You started out saying that it is the KJV Bible I am putting my faith in.  

Yes, to the exclusion of all other translations you claim are invalid.

But that's not accusing you of idolatry, is it?

[simplejeff]

5 minutes ago, OldSchool2 said:

If I eat a rare steak with blood in it am I committing a deadly sin?

Which Testament are you are living in? the Old, or the New?

If you reject Jesus, and if you reject all the messengers Yahweh sends, 

does it matter at all if you commit more deadly sins ?  (hint: no) 

[Guest shiloh357]

Just now, OldSchool2 said:

Yes, to the exclusion of all other translations you claim are invalid.

But that's not accusing you of idolatry, is it?

Actually bibliolatry IS an an accusation of idolatry, of idolizing the Bible and that is exactly what you meant to convey.

[simplejeff]

21 minutes ago, Butero said:

That is a personal attack in violation of the TOS.  It is no less of an attack than Simple Jeff saying you work for the devil.  

ooops -  you'll have to quote me there Butero .....   he like all the roman catholics except any who are saved in spite of their religion,  and like all the world,  are subject to the prince of the power of the air (the devil) EPHESIANS 2,

JUST LIKE WE ALL ONCE WERE......  but I don't remember saying he works for the devil,  regardless of if he does or not...

[Guest Butero]

Just now, OldSchool2 said:

Yes, to the exclusion of all other translations you claim are invalid.

But that's not accusing you of idolatry, is it?

You certainly did, and I never claimed anyone had to read from any Bible at all to be saved.  All one has to do to be saved is believe on Jesus and follow him.  They can do that by hearing the word preached to them without ever seeing any Bible.  Your accusation was false, which is why I find it surprising you would report someone for saying you are working for the devil.  I would think that if you are guilty of violating the TOS, you would want to lay low, so to speak. 

[OldSchool2]

1 minute ago, Butero said:

You saw the scripture, and you know full well it says exactly what I said it does.  Personally, I won't eat rare steak.  I cook it until it is nearly burnt so there is no blood....

But not everyone eats only vegetables (Romans 14:2).