Gender equality

[creativemechanic]

I saw this post online. Tell me what you think.

[Justin Adams]

Always a man should defer to a female.

Saw in the news there are now THREE genders in some states. DUHH??

Edited January 16, 2020 by Justin Adams

[Justin Adams]

1 minute ago, maryjayne said:

more than three in the UK, plus non-gender

Wow.

[Equippers]

1 hour ago, creativemechanic said:

I saw this post online. Tell me what you think.

what is wrong with this photo? what does it have anything to do with gender equality?

this Otlhabane guy is stupid. 

so those men who got on the subway before this woman and managed to secure a seat for themselves should give up their seats for this woman? is that what Otlhabane is implying?

i comes from an Asian culture where we do believe it is warranted to give up one's seat in certain situations, those includes for children, elderly and women, but only if they are pregnant.

is the woman in the photo an elderly or pregnant. Does not seem like it.

Edited January 16, 2020 by Equippers

[Equippers]

i should also add i have zero respect for the so called modern day feminist, especially if they are men.

it seems they love to cherry pick situations to support their own skewed narratives.

if they really care about gender equality, then they would acknowledge situations where men are at a disadvantaged.

for example, in many colleges in the US now, there are more females compares with males at undergraduate level.

where is the outrage of the so called gender equalrists?

[Equippers]

32 minutes ago, Justin Adams said:

Always a man should defer to a female.

 

are you serious?

[Justin Adams]

2 minutes ago, Equippers said:

are you serious?

As in the picture, I will always get up for a female and hold the door for one too. It is the way I were dragged up...

[Equippers]

13 minutes ago, Justin Adams said:

As in the picture, I will always get up for a female and hold the door for one too. It is the way I were dragged up...

don't you find it a bit ironic that many feminists might consider male chivalry like opening the door for women as patronising and condescending?

i am not saying this is what i think.

i just think there is no pleasing the modern day feminists.

Edited January 16, 2020 by Equippers

[Equippers]

6 minutes ago, Sonshine said:

Equippers, it’s  just plain good manners and what most Christians would do.  Jesus would have.

Galatians 5:22-23 New King James Version (NKJV)

²² But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, ^23 [a]gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law.

it's a culture thing

nowhere in the scripture, including one you cited, state men must give up their seat for a woman

like i mentioned earlier, in my culture, the only situations where a person should give up their seat are for children, elderly, and women, but only if they are pregnant

 

[creativemechanic]

37 minutes ago, Equippers said:

what is wrong with this photo? what does it have anything to do with gender equality?

this Otlhabane guy is stupid. 

so those men who got on the subway before this woman and managed to secure a seat for themselves should give up their seats for this woman? is that what Otlhabane is implying?

i comes from an Asian culture where we do believe it is warranted to give up one's seat in certain situations, those includes for children, elderly and women, but only if they are pregnant.

is the woman in the photo an elderly or pregnant. Does not seem like it.

I agree 100%