Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  15
  • Topic Count:  336
  • Topics Per Day:  0.19
  • Content Count:  13,845
  • Content Per Day:  7.94
  • Reputation:   14,350
  • Days Won:  150
  • Joined:  08/26/2020
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

One thing many denominations, in addition to single churches, tend to do is to hyper focus on only one or two key doctrines often times at the expense of others. I say churches because sometimes it's a single pastor who will hammer away at select doctrines either denomination motivated or personally selected doctrines. Meanwhile the members are starving for something more relevant to them or their situation as taught from the scriptures.

The danger of this is to think we are doing everything right ( in following denominational confines) when in reality the Lord may be leading into more needful areas for that congregation. We put together recipes for worship that make us feel like we are doing something. This is one of the biggest dangers in making up things to follow to make us all feel good about ourselves. We did "church" today. Let's unpack that some. Exactly WHAT did you do and WHY does it make you feel good?

If we lit a few candles or read a few lines in a handout orsang a few songs while only going through the motions of religion we might as well have stayed home.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

  • Group:  Non-Conformist Theology
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  40
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  627
  • Content Per Day:  0.48
  • Reputation:   333
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/31/2021
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)

1 Corinthians 1:10-17 explains denominations in a nutshell.

I appeal to you, brothers and sisters,[a] in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought. 11 My brothers and sisters, some from Chloe’s household have informed me that there are quarrels among you. 12 What I mean is this: One of you says, “I follow Paul”; another, “I follow Apollos”; another, “I follow Cephas”; still another, “I follow Christ.”

13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul? 14 I thank God that I did not baptize any of you except Crispus and Gaius, 15 so no one can say that you were baptized in my name. 16 (Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas; beyond that, I don’t remember if I baptized anyone else.) 17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel—not with wisdom and eloquence, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.

Bottom line: Follow Yeshua (Jesus the Christ) NOT doctrines of man!

Edited by Bawb

  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,790
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   983
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/20/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
3 hours ago, Bawb said:

Bottom line: Follow Yeshua (Jesus the Christ) NOT doctrines of man!

So then you would of course be Pentecostal same as the first church?

1Cor 1:2  To the church of God that is in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints together with all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours: 
3  Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. 


  • Group:  Non-Conformist Theology
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  40
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  627
  • Content Per Day:  0.48
  • Reputation:   333
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/31/2021
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Waggles said:

So then you would of course be Pentecostal same as the first church?

 

Not even close, I would be Messianic. Following Yeshua and not man. And let's not even use the word "church". By studying the Greek words found in the New Testament, that the pattern which God intends His people to follow and live by is the ECCLESIA system, and is RADICALLY different than that which calls itself "church" in our day. The truth is that "Christians" today have been fed a LIE, and that they have been enslaved by the religious systems of men.

On the other hand, an ECCLESIA better describes a body of Messianic believers called out of the Roman and Judean system to come together into a separate civil community. It meant a politically autonomous body of Yeshua believers under no king but Yeshua; under no other jurisdiction but that of Yeshua. No man ruled them! Only Yeshua. And that was the reason these same Messianic believers ran into trouble with kings and rulers; were arrested, crucified and martyred. They dropped Caesar as their King and took up Yeshua.

Edited by Bawb

  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,790
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   983
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/20/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Bawb said:

Not even close, I would be Messianic. Following Yeshua and not man. And let's not even use the word "church". By studying the Greek words found in the New Testament, that the pattern which God intends His people to follow and live by is the ECCLESIA system, and is RADICALLY different than that which calls itself "church" in our day. The truth is that "Christians" today have been fed a LIE, and that they have been enslaved by the religious systems of men.

Ok so tell us how you are better than the first church that we can read of in our New Testament. 

1Cor 12:28  And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then powers, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, kinds of tongues.

church = G1577  ἐκκλησία  ekklēsia

Edited by Waggles

  • Group:  Non-Conformist Theology
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  40
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  627
  • Content Per Day:  0.48
  • Reputation:   333
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/31/2021
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
5 minutes ago, Waggles said:

Ok so tell us how you are better than the first church that we can read of in our New Testament. 

1Cor 12:28  And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then powers, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, kinds of tongues.

church = G1577  ἐκκλησία  ekklēsia

Now, let's look at the word, "ecclesia". This Greek word appears in the New Testament approximately 115 times. That's just in this one grammatical form. It appears also in other forms. And in every instance, except three, it is wrongly translated as "church" in the King James Version. Those three exceptions are found in Acts 19:32, 39, 41. In these instances the translators rendered it "assembly" instead of "church." But, the Greek word is exactly the same as the other 112 entries where it was changed to "church" wrongly.

In Acts 19, "ecclesia" is a town council: a civil body in Ephesus. Thus, the translators were forced to abandon their fake translation in these three instances. Nonetheless, 112 times they changed it to "church." This fact has been covered-up under centuries of misuse and ignorance. The Greek word "ecclesia" is correctly defined as: "The called-out (ones)" [ECC = out; KALEO = call]. Thus, you can see how this word was used to indicate a civil body of select (called, elected) people.

According to the Encyclopedia Britannica:

In the New Testament, "ecclesia" (signifying convocation) is the only single word used for church. It (ecclesia) was the name given to the governmental assembly of the city of Athens, duly convoked (called out) by proper officers and possessing all political power including even juridical functions.

Obviously, in Greece an ecclesia had no resemblance to a church. An "ecclesia" was a civil assembly in Athens even before the writing of the New Testament. In the Oxford Universal English Dictionary (considered the standard for the English language) the word "ecclesia" is listed in its English form as used by our English forefathers. (Nowadays, only forms of the word appear - like, "ecclesiastical").

Quoting from the Oxford Universal English Dictionary on the word "ecclesia":


  • Group:  Non-Conformist Theology
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  40
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  627
  • Content Per Day:  0.48
  • Reputation:   333
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/31/2021
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Quoting from the Oxford Universal English Dictionary on the word "ecclesia": Ecclesia [mediaeval Latin, and Greek - from : SUMMONED] -A regularly convoked assembly, especially the general assembly of Athenians.

Let's continue by defining the word. "Church" comes from the Old English and German word pronounced "kirche." In Scotland, it was "kirk."

The following entries are from the Oxford Universal English Dictionary:

Church [Old English cirice, circe; Middle English chereche, chiriche, chirche; whence churche, cherche, etc.: -Greek Kuriakon...]

Kirk The Northern English and Scottish form of CHURCH, in all its senses.

In the earlier Greek It was pronounced "ku-ri-a-kos" or "ku-ri-a-kon." As you can see, this word doesn't even resemble the Greek word "ecclesia" whose place it has usurped. The meaning of "Ku-ri-a-kos" is understood by its root: "Ku- ri-os," which means "lord." Thus, "kuriakos" (i.e., "church") means "pertaining to the lord." It refers to something that pertains to, or belongs to, a lord. The Greek "kuriakos" eventually came to be used in Old English form as "cirice" (Kee-ree-ke), then "churche" (kerke), and eventually "church" in its traditional pronunciation. A church, then, is correctly something that "pertains to, or belongs to, a lord."


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,790
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   983
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/20/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

That is all very nice and interesting to read over eating of cornflakes but it is a complete red herring to the topic of discussion -

28 minutes ago, Bawb said:

Not even close, I would be Messianic. Following Yeshua and not man.

How is your claim of following Yeshua (a.k.a. Jesus) better than the first ekklēsia of the NT??

For if I believe and do exactly the same as the ekklēsia of the apostles and disciples in scripture then surely I would be the same as them? 

  • Thanks 1

  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,790
  • Content Per Day:  0.66
  • Reputation:   983
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/20/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

1Cor 1:1  Paul, called by the will of God to be an apostle of Christ Jesus, and our brother Sosthenes, 
2  To the ekklēsia of God that is in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints together with all those who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both their Lord and ours: 
3  Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. 

saints = G40  ἅγιος  hagios
From ἅγος hagos (an awful thing) compare G53, [H2282]; sacred (physically pure, morally blameless or religious, ceremonially consecrated): - (most) holy (one, thing), saint.
Total KJV occurrences: 229

The Spirit-filled Christian is not only justified but also sanctified - made holy by the indwelling Holy Spirit - consecrated, set aside from worldly purpose.


  • Group:  Non-Conformist Theology
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  40
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  627
  • Content Per Day:  0.48
  • Reputation:   333
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  10/31/2021
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Waggles said:

That is all very nice and interesting to read over eating of cornflakes but it is a complete red herring to the topic of discussion -

How is your claim of following Yeshua (a.k.a. Jesus) better than the first ekklēsia of the NT??

For if I believe and do exactly the same as the ekklēsia of the apostles and disciples in scripture then surely I would be the same as them? 

It's not the same word... It does not mean the same thing.

Also, You really should know your Savior's real name, if you truly love him.

It's not the same name...

What does the name Jesus mean in Greek? In Greek, "Iesous" literally translated means "Hail Zeus". Straight from ancient Greek Mythology. PAGAN! Not my Messiah!

The name "Jesus" with a "J" didn't even exist until the 4th Century and was a later derivative of the late Latin Isus.

The etymology of the word Jesus comes from the Latin and so Jesus means means Earth Pig. Je = Ge= Earth and Sus = Pig therefore Jesus = Earth-Pig. Abomination!

The name Yeshua has real meaning "Yeshua that can be found in Hebrew and Aramaic biblical text, taken from the Hebrew verb, yasha, that means "to deliver, save, or rescue," and also stated as "Yehoshua." Pronunciation of "Yeshua," in Hebrew".

Edited by Bawb
spacing error
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...