Climate Change Is Extremely Political And Agenda Serving, Unfortunately It Is Also True

[ChristB4us]

18 hours ago, George said:

Honestly ... I've shared truth ... I'm not trying to convince you of anything.   I just imagine what you could do if you actually were empowered by the Spirit of God!  Most people are not "spirit-filled" because they don't even know to ask for it!  I pray for a fresh anointing EVERY single time I preach.  I ask for a fresh filling of His Spirit every single morning ... I'm a leaky vessel ... and I know I need to be constantly filled with His Spirit!   Charles Finney, in his book, "Power from on High" talks about the "baptisms' of the Spirit!   Trying to play Bible ping-pong is not my objective ... just real power-filled faith is the goal.  if you're not interested in studying the revivals before you ... then I'm not going to waste my time.  Be blessed! 

Seems what you are sharing is not aligning with His words below where Jesus said you do not have to think about what to speak.  I would take that as including praying about it also otherwise you are still thinking about it, right?

Matthew 10:19 But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. 20 For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you.

[The Barbarian]

43 minutes ago, ChristB4us said:

You realize how he begins stating that he was surmising

Yes, that's called a "hypothesis."    It's the second step in science after noticing something about nature.  He noticed that carbon dioxide absorbed infrared radiation.   He then hypothesized that more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would cause warming.  Then the world performed an experiment, testing his hypothesis, by increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.   As he predicted, temps went up, confirming his hypothesis.

43 minutes ago, ChristB4us said:

What if it wasn't the atmosphere in the way he was suspicious of as "trapping" heat but more heat was getting in?

Fortunately, we have a way to test that.   It's called "solar irradiance."  For the past few years, solar irradiance is lower than usual, but the temperatures are much higher than usual, again confirming his hypothesis.

43 minutes ago, ChristB4us said:

But the earth is not a closed system like that experiment was when other factors involve like plant life that exchange CO2 for oxygen.

Not a problem, since the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere can be directly measured.

43 minutes ago, ChristB4us said:

All of this is suppositions on an increase of carbon emission.

Yes.   That's pretty easy to demonstrate.   Would you like to learn how?

43 minutes ago, ChristB4us said:

Look at where it is going;  the conclusion is to reduce the human population without actually saying so.

In the absence of evidence, it seems that assumption is just a paranoid delusion.

From your link:

Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that human-made CO2 is an insignificant contributor to climate change. Though human-generated CO2 typically comprises a smaller proportion of atmospheric greenhouse gases than water vapor, research has shown unequivocally that it has a large impact and is changing Earth’s climate.

Did you even read it?

 

Edited June 16, 2023 by The Barbarian

[The Barbarian]

1 hour ago, ChristB4us said:

I see left wing corruption culture and media turns a blind eye when a transgender not only do a mass shooting but encourages it by calling it the day of vengeance for their side.

Show us that.   Sounds unlikely.   Most such shootings are the result of racist or extreme right-wing anger.

1 hour ago, ChristB4us said:

I also see left wing cancel culture rewriting history in respect to critical race theory.

Perhaps you don't know what CRT is.  What do you think it is?

1 hour ago, ChristB4us said:

So I do not see this as an age of the snowflake

At a time when we have the right melting down from beer cans, Dr. Seuss, mermaids who are the "wrong color", and whatnot, it seems like an emotional breakdown on the right.   Is there anything these offended little snowflakes don't throw tantrums over?

1 hour ago, ChristB4us said:

So you are only proving me right that we are being played by both sides as if the NWO wants a Civil War to break out, society collapses, and police state is ushered in.

Comes down to evidence.   No matter how much you want to believe, it still requires evidence.

1 hour ago, ChristB4us said:

Giving special privileges to transgenders ( and not all transgenders wanted this )

What "special privileges" do you think they want?  Be specific.

 

[Marathoner]

My friends, it would be good to keep the subject of the topic in mind. If one or more members wish to discuss a tangential topic then by all means, do so elsewhere; however, I encourage searching the forum first using the search function. The chances are high that a topic concerning that matter already exists. 

[The Barbarian]

1 hour ago, ChristB4us said:

I only quoted that website that was "pro vaccination" for what that French Laurette actually had said in how global vaccination creates variants.  It was written to refute that rumor he had said those vaccinated will die in 2 years.

Evolution creates variants.   They happen even without vaccines.   The vaccines save millions of lives but they do also increase selective pressure on the virus.   It's kind of like saying we shouldn't defend ourselves against predators, because we'll just breed better predators thereby.

The fact of much higher death rates for unvaccinated people than for vaccinated people make it clear how sound that thinking is.

 

[The Barbarian]

2 hours ago, ChristB4us said:

When F.B.I. are suspected as inciting Insurrection Day and the same F.B.I. "dropped" the ball on 9/11, and N.S.A. has been tasked with population control, you really should be wary more often for what they are feeding you for and why.

Problem with all that is, no evidence for any of it.  No matter how much anyone wants to believe that sort of thing, reality has the final word.

 

[The Barbarian]

2 hours ago, ChristB4us said:

I see the devil using the evolution theory for his own purposes.  

The devil often uses the truth to lie to us.   That's what he did in the Garden of Eden.   But truth is still the truth.

 

[The Barbarian]

2 hours ago, ChristB4us said:

How did he estimated the amount of energy from the sun hitting our planet for him to reach that conclusion?  Did he take into account the shields of the earth?  How about the orbital distance from the sun as it can be different for that year, yes?

Thermodynamics.    And consider how a 1% difference in distance matters when you realize that it's summer in the Northern Hemisphere when we are at our greatest distance from the Sun.    (Hint: look up "inverse square law")

 

[The Barbarian]

A great source for checking many of the more common claims of climate deniers, with links to evidence, can be found here:

https://skepticalscience.com/Monckton_Myths_arg.htm

[ChristB4us]

15 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

Thermodynamics.    And consider how a 1% difference in distance matters when you realize that it's summer in the Northern Hemisphere when we are at our greatest distance from the Sun.    (Hint: look up "inverse square law")

Meaning carbon emission has nothing to do with the warming of our planet since it has been that way since creation.

That one article about how water vapors do not trap heat, and yet the Lord watered the whole earth by that mist, is not responsible for the greenhouse effect of that time.

Matthew Maury's Paths of the Sea

The one thing that is overlooked is how Matthew Maury finding the pathways in the seas by the Bible stating that fact first should be telling that science should be looking at the Bible for the truth in what we see in the world around us.

Now putting on your scientific spectacles and not the evolution theory one; read this article with a skeptical eye in how they apply this fact.

Our moon has been slowly drifting away from Earth over the past 2.5 billion years

Science discovered the moon is slowly moving away from us.

Yet science also says they are rating everything by their dating methods on the assumption that there was no global calamity for the last 55,000 years that would mess with their radiometric dating, and so they did not consider the Biblical global flood when dating the formation of the moon and what prompted it to start its moving away from the earth.

Radiocarbon is key to understanding Earth's past

So look to the Bible & nature for what caused the Biblical global flood.

Since the Bible is true, then the asteroid impacts on the moon and on the earth has to be the caused of the Biblical global flood as it would start the moon to move away from the earth, causing the mist that was covering the earth to rise and condense into clouds to rain for the first time on earth.  

Then you have those asteroid impacts on earth that would cause the fountain of the deep to rise up, emptying the waters beneath the earth that was watering the whole earth to add to the deluge as well as that gigantic tsunamis from the seas that were all in one place in the Bible which mayhap be the Pacific basin.

This all brought on the Ice Age phenomenon as the weather would be changing drastically throughout the day as well as for days in settling as each layer of cold ice & snow will have debris in it as it forms.  How else can there be a volcano erupting in Lake Superior while an ice layer was supposedly developing the Great Lakes?

The Lake Superior Basin's Fiery Beginning

When you take into account that they cannot date these events right, then you may see how this was all forming in the aftermath of those asteroid impacts on the earth & moon.  They align all of this together for favoring the evolution theory's timeline in order to fit the inconsistencies of how they view everything in nature, but it is wrong.

Look at how they explain away fossilized whale bones with other marine fossils found on the Andes Mountain tops buried with fossilized land animal bones TOGETHER in that same layer of sediment that they were both fossilized by as described as in that one smooth gradient.

WHALE FOSSILS HIGH IN ANDES SHOW HOW MOUNTAINS ROSE FROM SEA

If you really looked at everything with the same amount of skepticism you do with Creationists' sites, you would know that they did not bother to explain how the land animal fossils were found buried with them in that same smooth gradient.

That, brother, is evidence of the Biblical global flood. 

The fact that they used this same line of bull for explaining how marine fossils are found everywhere in the world on mountaintops and far inland, is why you should discount everything about the evolution theory as a false science made up of false knowledge as they tried to build on the Law of Biogenesis by way of gradual microevolution to make macroevolution appear possible when it can never be.  The huge gaps of "transitional" fossils in this so called fossil records of the evolution theory proves that, but again, only the Lord can help you discern that true science from that false science.

What is true science?  What can be observed and proven.

What makes a scientific theory valid?  When the phenomenon is observed in the natural or real world.

The theory of evolution is invalid as the phenomenon of macroevolution cannot be observed in the real world & therefore can never be proven a& thus a false science.