So, the biggest question on the rise from abortionists.

[Mozart's Starling]

4 hours ago, angels4u said:

Who would you save?

Well as others have said it depends on the details. If they weren't fertilized then save the 5 year old girl. Easy. If they were it gets trickier, I'd probably still save the girl because A) She can feel pain B) Has a family already who would suffer from the loss. That doesn't make the embryo's lives not worth anything though. Here's an example would you save your friend from death or a stranger? Most would probably choose their friend. However does that indicate the stranger's life is worth nothing? That they are not a person? Not at all. If it were a pregnant woman vs a man I'd save the woman because I believe that what is inside her is a life. Reality is I'd save both if I could but that's not an option in this scenario. 

Edited September 28, 2023 by Mozart's Starling

[JimmyB]

Abortion is a valid medical procedure.  There are certain conditions in which the embryo or fetus cannot survive outside the womb.  An example of this is a fetus with defective lungs.  Another is defective kidneys. Another is a defective heart. 

It is senseless to endanger the life of the mother (who might have other children) because of some misapplied, false reasoning.  For those of you who oppose abortion, do you enjoy watching a newborn die?

[farouk]

On 9/23/2023 at 8:38 AM, Tristen said:

I don't think "wasting sperm" is a serious issue to God.

 

 

@Tristen I tend to agree; I'm not sure what the term really means in the bigger picture.

[WilliamL]

All these paradoxical questions arise because mankind rejected fellowship with God in favor of seeking their own way of life.

The only answer to the original question is: "What is the Holy Spirit directing you to do in the instance at hand."

NOT, what would YOU decide to do.

[RdJ]

On 9/18/2023 at 4:59 AM, believeinHim said:

A man should save a woman every time, pregnant or not, albeit, I think we are way past that, 

Why on earth? I'd save the atheist. I read that there was a man and his son and friend were drowning and he could only save one, so he saved his friend, who was an atheist, because his son was christian and would go to heaven and later the friend got saved. Don't know if I could do that.

[RdJ]

On 9/17/2023 at 10:28 PM, Mozart's Starling said:

You're in a burning building and there is a single 5 year old child vs 10 embryos. Which do you save? You can only save one or the other. Now this is not a question that implicates the embryos are meaningless even if you would choose the child. If you were to pay me 20,000 million dollars to destroy a SINGLE embryo I would not do it. If I had a pregnant woman vs a man I'd save the woman every time. I am not asking this to poke a hole or anything. Abortion is evil and this in no way justifies it. I am 100% pro life and was glad Roe V Wade was taken down. I ask it in case this question is brought up to us in real life. Any thoughts? There's also things to consider like the child has a family will feel pain. I just want a single BAM answer to this scenario to shut it down before it catches on. Best to be prepared for all tricks of Satan imo.

I had someone say this to me. You would save the child and don't care about the freezer full of embryo's. Yes. I don't care. It's not my kid. If I had frozen a child then yes I would save my child, but then it's easy to let the big kid go first, because the embryo will feel no pain and will go to heaven and there's no bond yet, but if it was only the embryo yes I would save my kid, get it implanted right away. But absolutely no way would I, suppose it was legal, let a kid from someone else who wants it killed be implanted in me to save it. Bye bye. Not my kid. Not my problem. What if it becomes a sociopath? And even if it's a fabulous person well maybe if I had no kids and God would really ask me to do it and give me a few million for the effort. 

Edited October 11, 2023 by Renskedejonge