When was the A.O.D fulfilled?

[Diaste]

On 6/23/2024 at 6:53 AM, Stewardofthemystery said:

Like I said, it does not matter where they were sitting when Jesus answered their question about the destruction of the Temple THEY WERE LOOKING AT WITH THEIR OWN EYES. 👀 

 

Scripture says, "As they were sitting on the Mount of Olives looking at the Temple..."?

Book, chapter and verse?

[Stewardofthemystery]

3 hours ago, Diaste said:

Scripture says, "As they were sitting on the Mount of Olives looking at the Temple..."?

Book, chapter and verse?

Matthew 24:1-3
24 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
 

Mark 13:1-413 And as he went out of the temple, one of his disciples saith unto him, Master, seewhat manner of stones and what buildings are here!
2 And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

Luke 21:5-7  5 And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said,

6 As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

It is very clear in all accounts given in Matthew, Mark, and Luke that Jesus and the apostles were talking about the Temple and surrounding buildings they were looking at "with their own eyes". 😊
 

 

[Desopixi Seilynam]

On 6/18/2024 at 9:08 AM, Stewardofthemystery said:

The false doctrines of men are trying to move this event into the future because they cannot “rightly divide”between past, present, and future events.

 

So the abomination of desolation happened already?

"When you shall see Jerusalem surrounded by armies,
then know that the desolation thereof is near"
Luke 21:20

That happened already, and anyone trying to show a connection
that statement has to the future must be false?

You skirted what I showed you originally.
You would have to address it in order to fully support your view.
Because the simple fact is that Jerusalem has been surrounded by armies
multiple times. And we can clearly see at least two 70 year periods of captivity.

The Babylonian captivity and A.D. 0 to A.D. 70 the Roman captivity.

These facts can not be denied, showing clearly that the prophecy
is divine, referring to multiple instances of Jerusalem being surrounded by armies.

The enemy has had to change scripture in order to hide just how much it reveals.
For 70 captivities are determined upon Israel and Jerusalem.

And the solid proof of my pen is 1967 to 2037,
which has been written many years before October 7th.

 

[Desopixi Seilynam]

On 6/18/2024 at 10:33 AM, BlindSeeker said:

I can't accept the "70 captivities [or the] 4,900 years worth of time of the people of Israel in captivity."

2028 is not far from 2037.

1967 to 2037 will prove to have been another 70 year captivity.

It can not be denied that multiple captivities have happened.
Babylonian, 0 to 70 ad Roman.

It can not be denied that thousands of years have past since the Messiah,
and since the captivity of the people of Israel in Egypt.

[Stewardofthemystery]

1 hour ago, Desopixi Seilynam said:

You would have to address it in order to fully support your view.

Because the simple fact is that Jerusalem has been surrounded by armies
multiple times. And we can clearly see at least two 70 year periods of captivity.

The Babylonian captivity and A.D. 0 to A.D. 70 the Roman captivity.

These facts can not be denied, showing clearly that the prophecy
is divine, referring to multiple instances of Jerusalem being surrounded by armies.

The enemy has had to change scripture in order to hide just how much it reveals.
For 70 captivities are determined upon Israel and Jerusalem.

And the solid proof of my pen is 1967 to 2037,
which has been written many years before October 7th.

 

People need to address the FACT that Jesus Christ said the AOD has to do with the destruction of the Temple HE and the apostles were looking at WITH THEIR OWN EYES!

Matthew 24:1-3
24 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
 

Mark 13:1-413 And as he went out of the temple, one of his disciples saith unto him, Master, seewhat manner of stones and what buildings are here!
2 And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

 

Luke 21:5-7  5 And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said,

6 As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

It is very clear in all accounts given in Matthew, Mark, and Luke that Jesus and the apostles were talking about the Temple and surrounding buildings they were looking at "with their own eyes". 😊

[Desopixi Seilynam]

On 7/1/2024 at 7:37 AM, Stewardofthemystery said:

Luke 21:5-7  5 And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said,

6 As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

It is very clear in all accounts given in Matthew, Mark, and Luke that Jesus and the apostles were talking about the Temple and surrounding buildings they were looking at "with their own eyes". 😊

Yes, and those buildings have been torn down, the wall that they bow at is not part of the original temple. And after those words Jesus said;

And when you shall see Jerusalem surrounded by armies,
then know that the desolation thereof is near.

Luke 21:20

Jerusalem has been very literally
surrounded by armies multiple times throughout history,
which afterwards resulted in captivity.

Jesus tied His prophetic words to the prophecy in Daniel, [Matthew 24:15]
I strongly believe that a correct translation of Daniel 9
is telling us that there will be 70, 70 year periods of captivity.
We can clearly see that there have been multiple 70 year periods of captivity.

The Babylonian and the Roman are the clearest two,
clearly two separate 70 year periods of captivity.
I believe the history of the captivities since then has been muddied
and distorted, but we can also see the time period of the so called
crusades during which Jerusalem was captured by forces led by the pope.