Could this be possible-Surely not????

[Guest man]

Man-don't think I'm for this, I thought it was weird.

Well someone here thinks it's real.

[Guest man]

Was it Hilary Clinton-yeah, she did it!!! She's tired of the Bushes

Then she should use the bathroom like everyone else.

[Candi770]

[botticelli]

I heard that when you do "control demolision" they have to cut big notches in certain part of the building.

does anyone know if thats true?

Edited September 16, 2006 by botticelli

[firehill]

Candi,

I'm afraid this borders on conspiracy. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, but there are just too many things that don't add up for it be a controlled demolition.

Just a few things I have wondered Ronald, what is your take on Building seven in the WTC complex?

No aeroplanes hit building 7, yet it "fell in a cloud of dust, in its own footprints" just like the others.

And do you have any theories on what happened to the $2.3 trillion dollars that was apparently in the WTC buildings at the time? It would seem that no evidence of the safe that it was in can be found.

Or any theories on "how convenient" it was that hundreds of files relating to litigation about corruption in governments and companies were destroyed in the fires? Coincidental?

Oh, and why was building number 2 in the WTC complex the first to collapse when it was the second to be hit with an aeroplane?

Oh, one more. Why do you think it was that moulten steel (without any traces of aluminium as would have been expected if it was from aircraft wreckage) was found at the WTC site when it would seem that aviation fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel and the other materials in the buildings could also not have made for a fire hot enough to melt steel. We were originally told that "the fire melted the steel and it collapsed".

I'm not proffering any theories here, I don't want to be labelled a "conspiracy theorist", just curious as to why there seem to be so many inconsistencies in what we are told. I just don't like things being untidy.

Does anyone have the answers to these questions?

[Guest LadyC]

candi, there are some very good programs on the history channel, and discovery, and similar stations that talk about the way the buildings were built... yes, they were made of steel, but they weren't invincible, no more than the titanic was. the structural damage to the steel as well as the extreme heat from the fire MELTING the steel, was what brought them down. no controlled demolition. no conspiracy theories. just proof that no matter how strong something is, it's not perfect.

[Candi770]

true- towers of silver and gold-gone in an instant

what ever the idol-it will fall!!!

[buckthesystem]

It's amazing how that you can't deny planes hit it, but yet you say it wasn't the planes that brought it down! So, what's the deal? Were they planning on blowing it up and it just so happened that the terrorists hit the same day? What do we make of that? And don't give me the baloney that the planes were flown via remote control; too many people called loved ones to tell them what was going on, etc. Maybe Elvis donned a Muslim disguise and decided to committ suicide and take some folks with him?

Now that is really odd! Gee this certainly is weird, and here I was thinking that nobody could make a conspiracy out of this.

But I just can't figure out why if " too many people called loved ones to tell them what was going on" and we know that before systems were "upgraded" in 2004 cellphones couldn't be used with accuracy on aircraft that was as high as these aeroplanes were, how it was done.

[sheya joie]

The steel supports do not need to actually melt, just weaken to the point they are structurally unsound.

[Guest man]

It's amazing how that you can't deny planes hit it, but yet you say it wasn't the planes that brought it down! So, what's the deal? Were they planning on blowing it up and it just so happened that the terrorists hit the same day? What do we make of that? And don't give me the baloney that the planes were flown via remote control; too many people called loved ones to tell them what was going on, etc. Maybe Elvis donned a Muslim disguise and decided to committ suicide and take some folks with him?

Now that is really odd! Gee this certainly is weird, and here I was thinking that nobody could make a conspiracy out of this.

But I just can't figure out why if " too many people called loved ones to tell them what was going on" and we know that before systems were "upgraded" in 2004 cellphones couldn't be used with accuracy on aircraft that was as high as these aeroplanes were, how it was done.

So is it just coincidence that these plains hit the towers?