Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  512
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  8,601
  • Content Per Day:  1.08
  • Reputation:   125
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  07/16/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/04/1973

Posted

I know obviously Yeshua is the equivalent term of Jesus, just as Joshua is I believe. Could someone clue me in as to why it is spelled this way and when it came into popular usage? I've seen "Yeshua" being used quite a bit on the boards and wanted to know more if that makes sense. Thanks.

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

First.....Jesus is not the equivalent because the name "Jesus" has no meaning (other than that which we assign to it ourselves)

Yeshua is also not the same as Joshua.

Joshua or Yehoshuah means Yah is my salvation"

Yeshua means "salvation" and it's in the present tense....in other words....salvation NOW!

In the hebrew there were places in the Bible where the word "yeshua" is used

link to the concordance page explaining Yeshua and how it is used in the OT

hope that gets you started good....


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  512
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  8,601
  • Content Per Day:  1.08
  • Reputation:   125
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  07/16/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/04/1973

Posted

The predominant theme seems to be "salvation" in Psalms where the word "Yeshua" is used. Wow, make an assumption and find out you're just scratching the surface!

Posted

Now go look at all those verses and substitue the word "Jesus" (since that is the name you usually associate with the Lord) and you will begin to see some verses in a different way.

Therefore with joy shall you draw water from the wells of Jesus.....


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.73
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.75
  • Reputation:   2,254
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
First.....Jesus is not the equivalent because the name "Jesus" has no meaning (other than that which we assign to it ourselves)

Yeshua is also not the same as Joshua.

Joshua or Yehoshuah means Yah is my salvation"

Yeshua means "salvation" and it's in the present tense....in other words....salvation NOW!

Stop! Rewind . . . .

I have always heard that "Yeshua" means "Yahweh saves."

I have also heard that "Jesus" is the English transliteration of the Greek transliteration (whatever that is) of the Hebrew "Yeshua."

I have then hear that the direct English transliteration of "Yeshua" comes out to "Joshua."

Can you please unravel the confusion? ;)


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  83
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  2,108
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   751
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  11/12/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Hi,

The word Jesus is not a translation but a label that greeks assigned to Yahshua. Iesus is the greek word for Jesus. Many believe that Iesus means "son of zeus" or "little zeus" and believe that greeks changed his name so other greeks who worshipped Zeus as their main deity would not be offened.

I personally believe that Jesus or Iesus is a plotted distortion of Yahshua's real name. Out of all the hebrew names in the bible only Yahshua's name was changed. The name above all names was changed! Why??? Why didnt the greeks change the name of Abraham, Isaac, Jacobs or any other hebrew names in the bible. The true english translation of Yahshua is Joshua. Just as Yahovah is translated into Jehovah/Johovah. We have to remember the hebrew language did not have the letter "j" but used "ya" instead.

If greeks had a hard time pronouncing Yahshua's name, well why didnt they change Joshua/Yahshua son of nun's name in the OT also.

So why did the name above all names "Yahshua" change? Who could dear change such a holy and powerful name by which men are saved?

Jesus is not the name of "Yahshua" Gods son.

If greeks just absolutly had to translate Yahshua's name it would be "Theosozo". meaning God saves.

Theos = God Sozo= Saves


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  16
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  270
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/03/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Hi,

The word Jesus is not a translation but a label that greeks assigned to Yahshua. Iesus is the greek word for Jesus. Many believe that Iesus means "son of zeus" or "little zeus" and believe that greeks changed his name so other greeks who worshipped Zeus as their main deity would not be offened.

I personally believe that Jesus or Iesus is a plotted distortion of Yahshua's real name. Out of all the hebrew names in the bible only Yahshua's name was changed. The name above all names was changed! Why??? Why didnt the greeks change the name of Abraham, Isaac, Jacobs or any other hebrew names in the bible. The true english translation of Yahshua is Joshua. Just as Yahovah is translated into Jehovah/Johovah. We have to remember the hebrew language did not have the letter "j" but used "ya" instead.

If greeks had a hard time pronouncing Yahshua name well why didnt they change Joshua/Yahusha son of nun's name in the OT also.

So how come the name above all names "Yahshua" changed? Who could dear change such a holy and powerful name by which men are saved?

Jesus is not the name of "Yahshua" Gods son.

If greeks just absolutly had to translate Yahshua's name it would be "Theosozo". meaning God saves.

Theos = God Sozo= Saves

Yeshua did tell us to beware the SCRIBES and false prophets, that we had to be more righteous that the scribes if we wanted to enter into heaven.

Yeshua could not draw all men to him, because his name was not really being lifted up when we referred to him as Jesus.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  75
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  2,802
  • Content Per Day:  0.33
  • Reputation:   46
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/29/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  06/01/1945

Posted

Greetings All,

During the time of Jesus, the predominant language was Koine Greek. In the then "world", this language was spoken by most if not all the nations. The oldest known piece of manuscript of the NT is in Greek. There are many expositors on the web that agree that the NT was most likely written in Greek. That means Paul and all the NT writers wrote to their mostly gentile audience in a language they would understand. Which means that they used the name IESUS, from which we get the English word Jesus.

Now I am not going to go about proving this, but it is reasonable and makes a whole lot of sense.

Blessings,

Dad Ernie


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  827
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  12,101
  • Content Per Day:  1.43
  • Reputation:   251
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  04/01/2002
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

You guys call me trav, and I respond, but that is not my name. Yet, when you discuss me amongst yourself it is clear that you speak of me.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  83
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  2,108
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   751
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  11/12/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Greetings All,

During the time of Jesus, the predominant language was Koine Greek. In the then "world", this language was spoken by most if not all the nations. The oldest known piece of manuscript of the NT is in Greek. There are many expositors on the web that agree that the NT was most likely written in Greek. That means Paul and all the NT writers wrote to their mostly gentile audience in a language they would understand. Which means that they used the name IESUS, from which we get the English word Jesus.

Now I am not going to go about proving this, but it is reasonable and makes a whole lot of sense.

Blessings,

Dad Ernie

Are you saying the IESUS is more understandable then Yahshua. How can a Label be more understandable then his original name which had meaning? Names and titles transcend language barriors. If he was called Yahshua then he should still be called Yahshua today in any language. Unless Yahshua delibertly changed his name.

We have no proof of which language the original writers of the NT used. All of the NT manuscipts are mere copies of copies. There were 3 main languages spoken during that time: Hebrew, Greek, and Latin.

This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.

(Joh 19:20)

I have heard people tell me that Hebrew was a dead language during that time, but Pilit put a sign over Yahshua written in the three most commonly used languages during that time so that all that spoke those languages could understand. Yes Iam sure greek was a common language amoung that time but that does not mean that Israel used that language on a day to day bases. This is like saying in our modern time english (international language) is the most common language therefore most people in Mexico and Cuba speak English on a day to day bases. Yes English is a international language but most likley if someone in Mexico were to write a letter or book it would most likely be in spanish.

We all know what Yahshua's orginal name is and it is in no way a hinderance to our english language. So why do we continue to use his pseudo name when we know his true and orginal name?

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...