Are these statements true?

[Fez]

[Fraught]

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/a...ng-solar-system

This site has some information on your questions....

hey, that's where i got the statements !!! under a heading, fast facts. i guess it didn't pan out here the way i thought it would. i was hoping some evolutionists would jump on and tell me why it wasn't true.

well, better luck next time

[Believer1997]

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/a...ng-solar-system

This site has some information on your questions....

hey, that's where i got the statements !!! under a heading, fast facts. i guess it didn't pan out here the way i thought it would. i was hoping some evolutionists would jump on and tell me why it wasn't true.

well, better luck next time

Sorry.... I'm not an evolutionist.... so I cannot help you.

[Massorite]

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/a...ng-solar-system

This site has some information on your questions....

hey, that's where i got the statements !!! under a heading, fast facts. i guess it didn't pan out here the way i thought it would. i was hoping some evolutionists would jump on and tell me why it wasn't true.

well, better luck next time

I don't think there are any evilutionists on this web site and there is no such a thing as luck.

[canuckamuck]

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/a...ng-solar-system

This site has some information on your questions....

hey, that's where i got the statements !!! under a heading, fast facts. i guess it didn't pan out here the way i thought it would. i was hoping some evolutionists would jump on and tell me why it wasn't true.

well, better luck next time

Ah, sorry. I did read your post, but decided not to argue the case. I am not familiar with physics, you see. I would say that any argument making the claim that the universe is very young, is very flawed. I don't think you will find many astronomers backing statements from AnswersInGenesis.

My first criticism of the argument is that its raison d

[Guest]

.... Those who write for AnswersInGenesis don't actually write scientific papers....

Well

Actually They Do

.... Answers Research Journal (ARJ) is a professional, peer-reviewed technical journal for the publication of interdisciplinary scientific and other relevant research from the perspective of the recent Creation and the global Flood within a biblical framework ....

And The Truth Is The LORD Jesus Christ

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

The same was in the beginning with God.

All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

John 1:1-5

And Him Crucified

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 3:16

So Dear One Don't Fool Yourself

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good.

God looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, that did seek God.

Every one of them is gone back: they are altogether become filthy; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

Psalms 53:1-3

Eternity Is Far Longer Than The Short Times Found Sprinkled Among The Plates Of "Scientific" Evolutionary Junk Food

The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into his hand.

He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

John 3:35-36

>>>>>()<<<<<

.... To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses ....

.... I know enough about science to know that scientists keep other scientists on their toes and are quick to criticize every new hypothesis that comes along ....

Well

Actually They Don't

.... As Christians we accept the facts of science. What we do not accept are the interpretations of those facts offered by some scientists. There is no conflict between the established facts of science and the Bible, though scientists often make unproved assumptions (such as the theory of evolution) that do conflict with Scripture. Although the Bible is written in everyday language and doesn't use modern scientific terminology, that does not mean it is scientifically inaccurate. Indeed, many of the world's greatest scientists have accepted the authority of the Bible, such as Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Lister, Pasteur, Kelvin, and others.

The conflict between science and Scripture comes when science steps outside the realm of that which is observable and reproducible and speculates on origins, values, and destinies. At that point science has ceased to be science and instead become a religious viewpoint, since those things are not subject to observation and experimentation ....

And We Know The Truth Of Origins No Scientist Could Discover Scientifically - Given To Us Through God's Holy Bible

In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:

Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

Colossians 1:14-17

And We Know The True Values Of The Godly Heart No Scientist Could Discover Scientifically - Given To Us Through God's Holy Bible

And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.

And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.

Mark 12:29-31

And We Know The True Destiny Of All Men No Scientist Could Discover Scientifically - Given To Us Through God's Holy Bible

Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.

Ecclesiastes 12:13-14

And We Know The Love Of God Any Scientist Can Discover If He Would But Believe

Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.

Jeremiah 15:16

Love, Joe

[ellarose]

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/a...ng-solar-system

This site has some information on your questions....

hey, that's where i got the statements !!! under a heading, fast facts. i guess it didn't pan out here the way i thought it would. i was hoping some evolutionists would jump on and tell me why it wasn't true.

well, better luck next time

Ah, sorry. I did read your post, but decided not to argue the case. I am not familiar with physics, you see. I would say that any argument making the claim that the universe is very young, is very flawed. I don't think you will find many astronomers backing statements from AnswersInGenesis.

My first criticism of the argument is that its raison d

[Massorite]

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/a...ng-solar-system

This site has some information on your questions....

hey, that's where i got the statements !!! under a heading, fast facts. i guess it didn't pan out here the way i thought it would. i was hoping some evolutionists would jump on and tell me why it wasn't true.

well, better luck next time

I don't think there are any evilutionists on this web site and there is no such a thing as luck.

Evil-utionists? Slip of the finger on the keyboard or a deliberate attempt to jab an evolutionist in the ribs? And exactly what did you mean by there being no evolutionists here?

Not at all a slip of the finger. I meant it. Why? Because the whole thing about the evolutionist concept is anti- word of God,(because it is a contradiction of the word of God), anti God (because it is God who wrote the Word of God) and antiChrist because the concept and it's origins came from a man who was at first antichrist. In other words he didn't like what the word of God said so he came up with something he did like. Living by the rules of evolution are much easier then living by the rules of God. It should be real easy for you. If everything came from or evolved from something else, then there is no God who created everything from nothing.

Now it is my belief that this concept of evolution has been evolving since Darwin conceived of the idea and it is in my opinion an evil concept so I simply cut to the chase and call it evilution. And those that believe in it are evilutionists. Because the concept and all that it stands for is evil and it has evolved from pin prick in the mind of one man into a religion or at the least into a belief that is now believed by multi-millions of people. It is an evil that is evolving.

As for a jab at in evolutionist. That is not my intent but it is calling it as I see it.

However I was mistaken about one thing though. Saying that there weren,t any evilutionists here was a blinket statment and I should not have made a it.

[Guest man]

Because, you know, the concept of microevolution is pretty much an indisputable fact. It can be observed and even demonstrated. Just look at bacteria. As time goes on, antibiotics are becoming less and less effective because bacteria are quickly developing a resistance to them. Evolution at work. If there was no evolution then the bacteria would not undergo any changes and antibiotics would never diminish in effectiveness.

What about all life as we know it? Do you believe everything evolved from lower lifeforms?

[pokemaughan]

That's macroevolution.

That being said, of course, the idea of macroevolution seems perfectly sensible. After all, it's just microevolution happening over a longer period of time; mutations have more opportunity to take hold, natural selection has more time to do its thing, so bigger changes become apparent. That's not to say that all life evolved from some primordial slime or any such thing, but saying "We are not the result of evolution" is not the same thing as saying "Evolution does not happen."

Sensible?

Microevolution is your lungs adapting to thinner air (mountain folks) or your feet toughening up (living in the wilderness without shoes).

Macroevolution is one set of DNA turning into another set. (Fish -> Turtle -> Dog -> Ape -> Human -> ??? [obviously oversimplified])

Microevolution is adaptations that are contained and possible within the original DNA.

Macroevolution is adaptations and mutations NOT contained in the original DNA.

Sensible...

Microevolution, sure.

Macro? Eh.

The only macroevolution I see is a God-fearing people turning into a lost, godless wreck of a people.