Most accurate Bible Translation

[He giveth more grace]

I wish that the Codex Sinaiticus was completely burned up by the monks of St. Catherine before that "Textus Receptus-hater" found it and the heritics Drs. Hort and Westcott translated it into English.

Is God going to find you on the side of Satan and the greatest attack against the Word of God.

[L.J.]

About KJV-Onlyist: I dare anyone to call me a KJV-Onlyist.

What about this statement: Only Throughbreds run in the Kentucky Derby. Does that make me a throughbred-onylist, NO, it is just the truth, only Throughbred run in the Derby, no Quarterhorses, Palominos, or Arabians. I hate the connotations that KJUV-Onlyist has acquired.

Monarch,

As a quick side note, it warms my heart to see a fellow Louisianian on here. I am from the Crowley area.

ok,

Again I am confused.

I don't think I called you a KJV-Onlyist.

I take it your not since you made such a dare.

But then you give the analogy of the Kentucky Derby (they do use quarter horses in the Evangeline Downs if I'm not mistaken ) If only one type of horse is allowed to race, then that race is a "that breed only" race.

Maybe my definition of KJV-Onlyism is skewed. I'm thinking KJV-Onlyist is someone who believes that the KJV is the only true Bible. Hence the term KJV-Onlyism. But then again I'm just a lowly layman who has a Cajun education. I have been horribly wrong before.

I too hate the connotations that KJV-Onlyist have acquired. Both sides do seem to scream at eachother alot. Again in my previous posts I have said many people have come to Christ using many different versions. .

I have not read all of the website you have posted. I am planning to read it soon. It does look very interesting.

Your brother in Christ,

L.J.

[L.J.]

I wish that the Codex Sinaiticus was completely burned up by the monks of St. Catherine before that "Textus Receptus-hater" found it and the heritics Drs. Hort and Westcott translated it into English.

Is God going to find you on the side of Satan and the greatest attack against the Word of God.

Wow,

Wish I would have seen this post before I posted before.

I have no clue why someone would call you a KJV-Onlyist. That would be outlandish to say the least lol.

[nChrist]

I wish that the Codex Sinaiticus was completely burned up by the monks of St. Catherine before that "Textus Receptus-hater" found it and the heritics Drs. Hort and Westcott translated it into English.

Is God going to find you on the side of Satan and the greatest attack against the Word of God.

You have self-certified yourself as a KJV-Onlyist in this and other threads. The outrageous statement above simply serves as a typical statement made by a KJV-Onlyist. You're open and extremely obvious about your KJV-Only stance, so additional quotes from this and other threads would be unnecessary.

[other one]

this is the Bible I use to study by.:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

the numbers are strongs and it's just a click away from seeing how the words are used in other places. Not a good read, but for trying to understans something difficult it's really good.

[Guest Butero]

I wish that the Codex Sinaiticus was completely burned up by the monks of St. Catherine before that "Textus Receptus-hater" found it and the heritics Drs. Hort and Westcott translated it into English.

Is God going to find you on the side of Satan and the greatest attack against the Word of God.

Congratulations brother. You have now been said to have made an outrageous comment by N'Christ. He said that of me in post #33. So what if you are called KJV-only? I couldn't care less if I wear those kind of labels. I don't have any problem with what you said. I agree with you 100 percent. Keep standing up for the truth. Yes, it can be lonely, but look at people like the Prophet Jeremiah. It was basically him against the entire Jewish remnant. Nobody believed him either, but he was vindicated, and I believe you will be too.

[Guest Butero]

this is the Bible I use to study by.:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

the numbers are strongs and it's just a click away from seeing how the words are used in other places. Not a good read, but for trying to understans something difficult it's really good.

That is interesting. I have one of those Strongs Concordances with the Greek and Hebrew Dictionary, but I can see the convenience of having the Greek and Hebrew words listed with each corresponding English word.

[hmbld]

KJV "only", really? I have been considering KJV, but definately not feeling the love by those promoting it is the only one!

Love ya anyway,

[Guest Butero]

KJV "only", really? I have been considering KJV, but definately not feeling the love by those promoting it is the only one!

Love ya anyway,

Do you think the comments by those who are not KJV only have been full of love? Go back and read some of those edifying comments where we were called simplistic, patently false, heretical, and part of Gail Riplinger's ilk. Look at the bias. All those things are overlooked, but everytime someone stands up for the KJV only position, they are attacked as lacking love.

Perhaps you really didn't see those comments? I will give you the benefit of the doubt. I never intended to get into this thread, but did after those who are KJV only were attacked as heretical.

[hmbld]

I did, and have noticed widespread lack of love in many threads, but to claim only one is right, all else is wrong, in your face kind of attitude, is hard for me. Father in law is JW, and tells all the time nobody is saved unless they join the JW, and I simply cannot believe that either, i don't read that kind of attitude from Jesus in the bible, seek and you will find, that i believe, as it is printed in the bible i currently read, maybe KJV is better, i admit i do not know, as I am reading this thread looking for insight into purchasing a new bible.

God bless,