2 types of Gays

[coheir]

 

Not that I didn't believe you, but I totally had to google this!  I can't believe I never heard about the Queen James Bible before now.  No, I can't believe I heard about the Lolcat Bible before I heard about the Queen James Bible! 

 

 

 

Boreded Ceiling Cat makinkgz Urf n stuffs

1 Oh hai. In teh beginnin Ceiling Cat maded teh skiez An da Urfs, but he did not eated dem.

2 Da Urfs no had shapez An haded dark face, An Ceiling Cat rode invisible bike over teh waterz.

3 At start, no has lyte. An Ceiling Cat sayz, i can haz lite? An lite wuz.4 An Ceiling Cat sawed teh lite, to seez stuffs, An splitted teh lite from dark but taht wuz ok cuz kittehs can see in teh dark An not tripz over nethin.5 An Ceiling Cat sayed light Day An dark no Day. It were FURST!!!1

6 An Ceiling Cat sayed, im in ur waterz makin a ceiling. But he no yet make a ur. An he maded a hole in teh Ceiling.7 An Ceiling Cat doed teh skiez with waterz down An waterz up. It happen.8 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has teh firmmint wich iz funny bibel naim 4 ceiling, so wuz teh twoth day.

9 An Ceiling Cat gotted all teh waterz in ur base, An Ceiling Cat hadz dry placez cuz kittehs DO NOT WANT get wet.10 An Ceiling Cat called no waterz urth and waters oshun. Iz good.

11 An Ceiling Cat sayed, DO WANT grass! so tehr wuz seedz An stufs, An fruitzors An vegbatels. An a Corm. It happen.12 An Ceiling Cat sawed that weedz ish good, so, letz there be weedz.13 An so teh threeth day jazzhands.

14 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has lightz in the skiez for splittin day An no day.15 It happen, lights everwear, like christmass, srsly.16 An Ceiling Cat doeth two grate lightz, teh most big for day, teh other for no day.17 An Ceiling Cat screw tehm on skiez, with big nails An stuff, to lite teh Urfs.18 An tehy rulez day An night. Ceiling Cat sawed. Iz good.19 An so teh furth day w00t.

20 An Ceiling Cat sayed, waterz bring me phishes, An burds, so kittehs can eat dem. But Ceiling Cat no eated dem.21 An Ceiling Cat maed big fishies An see monstrs, which wuz like big cows, except they no mood, An other stuffs dat mooves, An Ceiling Cat sawed iz good.22 An Ceiling Cat sed O hai, make bebehs kthx. An dont worry i wont watch u secksy, i not that kynd uf kitteh.23 An so teh...fith day. Ceiling Cat taek a wile 2 cawnt.

24 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has MOAR living stuff, mooes, An creepie tings, An otehr aminals. It happen so tehre.25 An Ceiling Cat doed moar living stuff, mooes, An creepies, An otehr animuls, An did not eated tehm.

26 An Ceiling Cat sayed, letz us do peeps like uz, becuz we ish teh qte, An let min p0wnz0r becuz tehy has can openers.

27 So Ceiling Cat createded teh peeps taht waz like him, can has can openers he maed tehm, min An womin wuz maeded, but he did not eated tehm.

28 An Ceiling Cat sed them O hai maek bebehs kthx, An p0wn teh waterz, no waterz An teh firmmint, An evry stufs.

29 An Ceiling Cat sayed, Beholdt, the Urfs, I has it, An I has not eated it.30 For evry createded stufs tehre are the fuudz, to the burdies, teh creepiez, An teh mooes, so tehre. It happen. Iz good.

31 An Ceiling Cat sayed, Beholdt, teh good enouf for releaze as version 0.8a. kthxbai.

 

It's too cute to be offensive!  I amz heretic?  <3

 

But back on topic, this is a link to the complete list of versus that were retranslated in the Queen James Bible and the explanation of how each change was arrived at using both the original language and historical context.

 

I can't say I am offended but I am most confused?

 

sounds like ebonics

[TsukinoRei]

 

 

Not that I didn't believe you, but I totally had to google this!  I can't believe I never heard about the Queen James Bible before now.  No, I can't believe I heard about the Lolcat Bible before I heard about the Queen James Bible! 

 

 

 

Boreded Ceiling Cat makinkgz Urf n stuffs

1 Oh hai. In teh beginnin Ceiling Cat maded teh skiez An da Urfs, but he did not eated dem.

2 Da Urfs no had shapez An haded dark face, An Ceiling Cat rode invisible bike over teh waterz.

3 At start, no has lyte. An Ceiling Cat sayz, i can haz lite? An lite wuz.4 An Ceiling Cat sawed teh lite, to seez stuffs, An splitted teh lite from dark but taht wuz ok cuz kittehs can see in teh dark An not tripz over nethin.5 An Ceiling Cat sayed light Day An dark no Day. It were FURST!!!1

6 An Ceiling Cat sayed, im in ur waterz makin a ceiling. But he no yet make a ur. An he maded a hole in teh Ceiling.7 An Ceiling Cat doed teh skiez with waterz down An waterz up. It happen.8 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has teh firmmint wich iz funny bibel naim 4 ceiling, so wuz teh twoth day.

9 An Ceiling Cat gotted all teh waterz in ur base, An Ceiling Cat hadz dry placez cuz kittehs DO NOT WANT get wet.10 An Ceiling Cat called no waterz urth and waters oshun. Iz good.

11 An Ceiling Cat sayed, DO WANT grass! so tehr wuz seedz An stufs, An fruitzors An vegbatels. An a Corm. It happen.12 An Ceiling Cat sawed that weedz ish good, so, letz there be weedz.13 An so teh threeth day jazzhands.

14 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has lightz in the skiez for splittin day An no day.15 It happen, lights everwear, like christmass, srsly.16 An Ceiling Cat doeth two grate lightz, teh most big for day, teh other for no day.17 An Ceiling Cat screw tehm on skiez, with big nails An stuff, to lite teh Urfs.18 An tehy rulez day An night. Ceiling Cat sawed. Iz good.19 An so teh furth day w00t.

20 An Ceiling Cat sayed, waterz bring me phishes, An burds, so kittehs can eat dem. But Ceiling Cat no eated dem.21 An Ceiling Cat maed big fishies An see monstrs, which wuz like big cows, except they no mood, An other stuffs dat mooves, An Ceiling Cat sawed iz good.22 An Ceiling Cat sed O hai, make bebehs kthx. An dont worry i wont watch u secksy, i not that kynd uf kitteh.23 An so teh...fith day. Ceiling Cat taek a wile 2 cawnt.

24 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has MOAR living stuff, mooes, An creepie tings, An otehr aminals. It happen so tehre.25 An Ceiling Cat doed moar living stuff, mooes, An creepies, An otehr animuls, An did not eated tehm.

26 An Ceiling Cat sayed, letz us do peeps like uz, becuz we ish teh qte, An let min p0wnz0r becuz tehy has can openers.

27 So Ceiling Cat createded teh peeps taht waz like him, can has can openers he maed tehm, min An womin wuz maeded, but he did not eated tehm.

28 An Ceiling Cat sed them O hai maek bebehs kthx, An p0wn teh waterz, no waterz An teh firmmint, An evry stufs.

29 An Ceiling Cat sayed, Beholdt, the Urfs, I has it, An I has not eated it.30 For evry createded stufs tehre are the fuudz, to the burdies, teh creepiez, An teh mooes, so tehre. It happen. Iz good.

31 An Ceiling Cat sayed, Beholdt, teh good enouf for releaze as version 0.8a. kthxbai.

 

It's too cute to be offensive!  I amz heretic?  <3

 

But back on topic, this is a link to the complete list of versus that were retranslated in the Queen James Bible and the explanation of how each change was arrived at using both the original language and historical context.

 

I can't say I am offended but I am most confused?

 

sounds like ebonics

 

 

Okee!  Sorry about the bunny trail.  Here is a little educational video breaking down the linguistics of lolspeak.  http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html

Lolspeak is often found in the form of captions on cute kitty pictures on the internet.  Hence, Lolcat is born.  

[Sevenseas]

Nothing to do with the op, but offended cat is offended  

[coheir]

 

 

 

Not that I didn't believe you, but I totally had to google this!  I can't believe I never heard about the Queen James Bible before now.  No, I can't believe I heard about the Lolcat Bible before I heard about the Queen James Bible! 

 

 

 

Boreded Ceiling Cat makinkgz Urf n stuffs

1 Oh hai. In teh beginnin Ceiling Cat maded teh skiez An da Urfs, but he did not eated dem.

2 Da Urfs no had shapez An haded dark face, An Ceiling Cat rode invisible bike over teh waterz.

3 At start, no has lyte. An Ceiling Cat sayz, i can haz lite? An lite wuz.4 An Ceiling Cat sawed teh lite, to seez stuffs, An splitted teh lite from dark but taht wuz ok cuz kittehs can see in teh dark An not tripz over nethin.5 An Ceiling Cat sayed light Day An dark no Day. It were FURST!!!1

6 An Ceiling Cat sayed, im in ur waterz makin a ceiling. But he no yet make a ur. An he maded a hole in teh Ceiling.7 An Ceiling Cat doed teh skiez with waterz down An waterz up. It happen.8 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has teh firmmint wich iz funny bibel naim 4 ceiling, so wuz teh twoth day.

9 An Ceiling Cat gotted all teh waterz in ur base, An Ceiling Cat hadz dry placez cuz kittehs DO NOT WANT get wet.10 An Ceiling Cat called no waterz urth and waters oshun. Iz good.

11 An Ceiling Cat sayed, DO WANT grass! so tehr wuz seedz An stufs, An fruitzors An vegbatels. An a Corm. It happen.12 An Ceiling Cat sawed that weedz ish good, so, letz there be weedz.13 An so teh threeth day jazzhands.

14 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has lightz in the skiez for splittin day An no day.15 It happen, lights everwear, like christmass, srsly.16 An Ceiling Cat doeth two grate lightz, teh most big for day, teh other for no day.17 An Ceiling Cat screw tehm on skiez, with big nails An stuff, to lite teh Urfs.18 An tehy rulez day An night. Ceiling Cat sawed. Iz good.19 An so teh furth day w00t.

20 An Ceiling Cat sayed, waterz bring me phishes, An burds, so kittehs can eat dem. But Ceiling Cat no eated dem.21 An Ceiling Cat maed big fishies An see monstrs, which wuz like big cows, except they no mood, An other stuffs dat mooves, An Ceiling Cat sawed iz good.22 An Ceiling Cat sed O hai, make bebehs kthx. An dont worry i wont watch u secksy, i not that kynd uf kitteh.23 An so teh...fith day. Ceiling Cat taek a wile 2 cawnt.

24 An Ceiling Cat sayed, i can has MOAR living stuff, mooes, An creepie tings, An otehr aminals. It happen so tehre.25 An Ceiling Cat doed moar living stuff, mooes, An creepies, An otehr animuls, An did not eated tehm.

26 An Ceiling Cat sayed, letz us do peeps like uz, becuz we ish teh qte, An let min p0wnz0r becuz tehy has can openers.

27 So Ceiling Cat createded teh peeps taht waz like him, can has can openers he maed tehm, min An womin wuz maeded, but he did not eated tehm.

28 An Ceiling Cat sed them O hai maek bebehs kthx, An p0wn teh waterz, no waterz An teh firmmint, An evry stufs.

29 An Ceiling Cat sayed, Beholdt, the Urfs, I has it, An I has not eated it.30 For evry createded stufs tehre are the fuudz, to the burdies, teh creepiez, An teh mooes, so tehre. It happen. Iz good.

31 An Ceiling Cat sayed, Beholdt, teh good enouf for releaze as version 0.8a. kthxbai.

 

It's too cute to be offensive!  I amz heretic?  <3

 

But back on topic, this is a link to the complete list of versus that were retranslated in the Queen James Bible and the explanation of how each change was arrived at using both the original language and historical context.

 

I can't say I am offended but I am most confused?

 

sounds like ebonics

 

 

Okee!  Sorry about the bunny trail.  Here is a little educational video breaking down the linguistics of lolspeak.  http://boingboing.net/2011/12/09/the-academic-linguistics-of-lo.html

Lolspeak is often found in the form of captions on cute kitty pictures on the internet.  Hence, Lolcat is born.  

 

even with the explanation, i do not care for it. I seems to be a parody, using ebonics, of the bible which i do not make fun of.

ebonics A poor excuse for a failure to grasp the basics of english. I think the ebonics definition could be used for this language also.it appears to elevate a cat to Gods position. poor taste.

[Xavier_Fairchild]

 

 

If you don't consider that an assault on the bible as well as Christianity or Gods view of right from wrong then I suppose we simply disagree.

 I'm sorry, but I do not understand why I should be upset or feel my Christian faith is under assault because a group of people want to make their own version of the Bible. Many people throughout history have twisted the words of the Bible to justify how they live or what they do. I do not nor have I ever felt that my faith or what I believe  threaten by this. In other words, I may not like what they are saying, may disagree with what they are saying, but in no way do I feel they are going to be threat to my own personal faith.

 

see, that how I feel too. Although people shouldn't mess with the word,

 

"Ye shall not add unto the Word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it" (Deuteronomy 4:2).

"Add thou not unto His words, lest He reprove thee, and thou be found a liar" (Proverbs 30:5, 6)

 

it don't effect my faith, an what adult people do in their own time and place, is none of my buisness, unless they building missiles in their basement or something. It pretty obvious just from the cover of the Queen James bible it prolly supposed to be sattire, not sure why anyone would take it as serious. 'Lolcat' bible look like fun, bunch of memes an stuff, maybe Lolcat just an embodyment of Longcat (shrug).

[Guest Butero]

 

 

But back on topic, this is a link to the complete list of versus that were retranslated in the Queen James Bible and the explanation of how each change was arrived at using both the original language and historical context.

 

What it boils down to is the pro homosexual christian believes that the translation is based on temple prostitution, God is against HS when it's done in said fashion.

This is where the love doctrine comes in, they believe, and it was largely introduced by Walter Winks, that homosexuals that love is perfectly acceptable in Gods economy.

I've meet and witness to a number of them. Love trumps sin, it's a very ingenious approach. I as well as Betero have seen the same message that loving others is the only perceptive a Christian should be concerned with.  It's been my observation that this is very near leading to a new age type philosophy. I don't see Jesus expressing this type of love that is talked about in the accounts of the gospels. He didn't mince words with people that manipulated or rejected the presentation of God.

 

I don't want to take your thread off into left field, but since you are discussing the Queen James Version Bible, I want to add this.  It is because of this kind of abomination that I won't use anything but the original King James Bible.  It is not the only reason, but it is one big reason.  Too many of the new translations have an agenda behind them, and it isn't always to give us the most accurate Word of God.  I am not one who believes that those who use new translations are of the devil or unsaved.  I just don't trust them.  I could go further, but I will leave it with that because we have had more than enough debates over Bible translations. 

 

In Romans chapter one, some claim this was only referring to temple prostitutes, but that is clearly not the case.  In addition to that, we find more references to how God views homosexuality in the OT.  If someone doesn't like something in the Bible, they will always find an argument against it, even if it means denying Biblical authority, or claiming scripture doesn't mean what it says. Someone went so far in one web-site as to say we got something wrong because they could have used a different Greek word in one instance that would have given the passage a different meaning?  It doesn't matter that they didn't use the word they referred to.  Just the fact they could have was enough to say we got it wrong.   

[Micheal Westin]

 

 

If you don't consider that an assault on the bible as well as Christianity or Gods view of right from wrong then I suppose we simply disagree.

 I'm sorry, but I do not understand why I should be upset or feel my Christian faith is under assault because a group of people want to make their own version of the Bible. Many people throughout history have twisted the words of the Bible to justify how they live or what they do. I do not nor have I ever felt that my faith or what I believe  threaten by this. In other words, I may not like what they are saying, may disagree with what they are saying, but in no way do I feel they are going to be threat to my own personal faith.

 

I'm sure the early reformers would beg to disagree, seeing how twisted the word of God can get, it only gets ironically clear when those who have twisted the word of God are in the position of authority and decide that you need to be split in two or burned at a stake

[Rex11]

 

 

 

But back on topic, this is a link to the complete list of versus that were retranslated in the Queen James Bible and the explanation of how each change was arrived at using both the original language and historical context.

 

What it boils down to is the pro homosexual christian believes that the translation is based on temple prostitution, God is against HS when it's done in said fashion.

This is where the love doctrine comes in, they believe, and it was largely introduced by Walter Winks, that homosexuals that love is perfectly acceptable in Gods economy.

I've meet and witness to a number of them. Love trumps sin, it's a very ingenious approach. I as well as Betero have seen the same message that loving others is the only perceptive a Christian should be concerned with.  It's been my observation that this is very near leading to a new age type philosophy. I don't see Jesus expressing this type of love that is talked about in the accounts of the gospels. He didn't mince words with people that manipulated or rejected the presentation of God.

 

I don't want to take your thread off into left field, but since you are discussing the Queen James Version Bible, I want to add this.  It is because of this kind of abomination that I won't use anything but the original King James Bible.  It is not the only reason, but it is one big reason.  Too many of the new translations have an agenda behind them, and it isn't always to give us the most accurate Word of God.  I am not one who believes that those who use new translations are of the devil or unsaved.  I just don't trust them.  I could go further, but I will leave it with that because we have had more than enough debates over Bible translations. 

 

 

With the use of computized bibles I find it very easy to compare versions as well as carry my library on my android phone which includes strongs numbers and several comentaries.

I have noticed the slant in translations.

 

For taking the thread off topic don't worry about it, but not only was my original post addressing the gay movment under the banner of love, I also hint at the churches using the same montra that love is all that matters or being "non judgemental" is more to the point.

 

Just google "new age is a non judgmental religion"

or here is a link that speaks about it http://www.letusreason.org/current86.htm

 

But people just don't want to talk about how these things that effect churches, what is taught and the very laws that are under revision, it requires effort and observation, as well as comparing what is said with what you read and understand for yourself.

 

 

 

I'm sure the early reformers would beg to disagree, seeing how twisted the word of God can get, it only gets ironically clear when those who have twisted the word of God are in the position of authority and decide that you need to be split in two or burned at a stake

 

 

 

That is the core issue no matter where it might lead, it certainly leading to a silencing of churches reguarding gays.

Being a Non judgemental church is the politicaly correct church of today.

 

Many just don't care so long as it doesn't effect there own little world, I often wounder how their faith would weather a storm if they were sudenly striped of all the worldly comforts they enjoy, like a job and a place to live as well as there nested finacual security. It's an easy thing to say you have faith it's quite another to walk the walk.

[Xavier_Fairchild]

That is the core issue no matter where it might lead, it certainly leading to a silencing of churches reguarding gays.

Being a Non judgemental church is the politicaly correct church of today.

 

Many just don't care so long as it doesn't effect there own little world, I often wounder how their faith would weather a storm if they were sudenly striped of all the worldly comforts they enjoy, like a job and a place to live as well as there nested finacual security. It's an easy thing to say you have faith it's quite another to walk the walk.

 

 

Yeah, like the trials of Job. Sometimes though, losing everything, is what brings people closer to God, sometimes, that exactly what it take. When people content, they don't care about anything, they just concerned with, like you said bro, their 'own little world'. It the same with Christians and non-Christians alike, but when it come to Christians, sometimes God test their faith, to wake them back up when they get lazy an 'drag their feet' in their walk with him.

[TsukinoRei]

 

 

 

If you don't consider that an assault on the bible as well as Christianity or Gods view of right from wrong then I suppose we simply disagree.

 I'm sorry, but I do not understand why I should be upset or feel my Christian faith is under assault because a group of people want to make their own version of the Bible. Many people throughout history have twisted the words of the Bible to justify how they live or what they do. I do not nor have I ever felt that my faith or what I believe  threaten by this. In other words, I may not like what they are saying, may disagree with what they are saying, but in no way do I feel they are going to be threat to my own personal faith.

 

see, that how I feel too. Although people shouldn't mess with the word,

 

"Ye shall not add unto the Word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it" (Deuteronomy 4:2).

"Add thou not unto His words, lest He reprove thee, and thou be found a liar" (Proverbs 30:5, 6)

 

it don't effect my faith, an what adult people do in their own time and place, is none of my buisness, unless they building missiles in their basement or something. It pretty obvious just from the cover of the Queen James bible it prolly supposed to be sattire, not sure why anyone would take it as serious. 'Lolcat' bible look like fun, bunch of memes an stuff, maybe Lolcat just an embodyment of Longcat (shrug).

 

Lest we forget that the King James Bible is called the King James Bible because King James wanted his own version of the  Bible, along with his own version of Christianity to allow for his own divorce and remarriage.  Millions of people have still been reached by that Bible and millions of Protestants are still extremely anti-Catholic!  The Queen James Bible still has all the passages about creation, all the passages about Jesus Christ, all the passages about salvation.  It even still contains all the passages about homosexuality, but translated differently.  Isn't it wonderful that all these people who otherwise wouldn't read the Bible now may and so now may be reached, and may go so far as to return to the original Greek of the passages about homosexuality and, with the prayerful guidance of the Holy Spirit which this Queen James Bible should still correctly lead them to, decide for themselves what is the truer translation?

Edited August 10, 2013 by TsukinoRei