Malaysian Plane missing

[OakWood]

 

as sick as Islam is (my opinion) they don't really go around killing people for no reason.

why would Islam want to or see a need to do this?

 

The only speculation I have goes back to the "shoe bomber" and the "underwear bomber" - if either had succeeded, would it have not been just a random plane that was exploded for the purpose of seeing what they could get away with? (At least, that is my understanding for why those two events happened.)

 

 

It's simple.

Allah hates non-believers and wants them dead. The Qu'ran makes that clear. Muslims are justified in murdering innocents because in their eyes they are not innocent. Let me remind you of the chilling words of Muslim cleric Abu Hamza:

 

"Killing of the Kaffir (non-believers) for any reason you can say it is OK, even if there is no reason for it."

 

Abu Hamza al-Masri

 

And another quote:

 

 

"We don't make a distinction between civilians and non-civilians, innocents and non-innocents. Only between Muslims and unbelievers. And the life of an unbeliever has no value. It has no sanctity."

 

Omar Bakri Muhammad - 2009

 

There is every justification for Muslims to kill non-Muslims. They can do so with a clear conscience.

[other one]

I thought those planes were headed for the US. Are they taking on China for something. What were the knifings all about

[OakWood]

I thought those planes were headed for the US. Are they taking on China for something. What were the knifings all about

 

China has been preventing Muslims from doing what Muslims like to do. They are not as soft as the West and they have been stopping Muslims from trying to bring in Sharia law in Xinjiang province which is in the far north west of China bordering other Muslim nations of Central Asia. They have also clamped down on excessive mosque building.

Muslims being Muslims, have not taken to this lightly. They were most likely responsible for the terrorist attack at the railway station in Kunming where all those people were stabbed.

[ayin jade]

At the bottom of this article is a map of the area and the current and planned search areas. For those following the story, this is an interesting map.

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-26513506

[missmuffet]

At the bottom of this article is a map of the area and the current and planned search areas. For those following the story, this is an interesting map.

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-26513506

Thanks for sharing.That was interesting.Gives me more idea of what the news people are talking about.

[other one]

we spent abouy 48 hours looking for a person who was overboard half way to Hawaii on a vruise in Janurary... it's a really big ocean

... even for a really big plane.

[missmuffet]

we spent abouy 48 hours looking for a person who was overboard half way to Hawaii on a vruise in Janurary... it's a really big ocean

... even for a really big plane.

Especially if the pieces are one inch in diameter.

[ayin jade]

I wondered about the depth of the water there. I found this online:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/10/opinion/palmer-malaysia-aircraft-air-france/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
 

 

In the case of the Air France plane, it was five days of intensive searching before the first floating wreckage was found. It took nearly two years to locate the remains of the aircraft on the ocean floor 12,000 feet below, broken into thousands of pieces by the impact with the water.

Location of the wreckage may be aided by underwater locator beacons on the airplane's flight recorders, if they have not been damaged in the impact like those on the French plane were.

In contrast, the Gulf of Thailand has a maximum depth of only 260 feet, with the average being about 150 feet. If the aircraft is in the water, it should make recovery easier than the long and expensive effort to bring up key parts of the Air France plane from the 2½-mile deep ocean, where most of the airplane and many of its victims remain.

 

 

[OldSchool2]

I wondered about the depth of the water there. I found this online:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/10/opinion/palmer-malaysia-aircraft-air-france/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

In the case of the Air France plane, it was five days of intensive searching before the first floating wreckage was found. It took nearly two years to locate the remains of the aircraft on the ocean floor 12,000 feet below, broken into thousands of pieces by the impact with the water.

Location of the wreckage may be aided by underwater locator beacons on the airplane's flight recorders, if they have not been damaged in the impact like those on the French plane were ...

There remains a great deal of controversy concerning the TWA Flight 800 Air France crash in '96 as none of the eyewitnesses were called during open hearings.

There is a "pinger" on airliners that sends a signal out every second for 30 days if it makes contact with sea water, but the latest catastrophe theory is that a sudden loss of cabin pressure incapacitated both passengers and crew and the plane just flew on till it ran out of fuel, perhaps over land.

As for the two passengers with bogus visas, apparently Kuala Lumpur International Airport doesn't bother checking for stolen passports with Interpol -- the region has been characterized as a hub for illegal immigration and human trafficking.

[OldSchool2]

from Reagan Reports:

Malaysian Jet Disappears But Passenger Smart Phones Keep Ringing

"Malaysian police investigating the disappearance of a Malaysian Airlines jet are considering hijacking, sabotage, and mechanical failure as potential causes of the disaster, reports the Wall Street Journal. But even though the plane has disappeared, the Daily Mail reports relatives of missing passengers have still been able to call the cellphones of missing passengers ..."