other one Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 599 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,232 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,954 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 (edited) My mom described my guardian angel to me when I was young...... I found a picture of her description some time ago. and just in case you are wondering, no I'm really not joking.... Edited August 24, 2015 by other one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,992 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,690 Content Per Day: 11.77 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 Not so much any more but in the past?I am sure I had them working over time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.10 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 There is no doctrine in Scripture that we have personal angels. Their statement only shows that these early believers still had a residue of Jewish superstitions that they had not managed to discard. Nothing in the Bible indicates that God assigns our personal angel.Bopeep, really? You strain at gnats and swallow camels? Jesus was talking about multiple children so there are multiple angels involved "Their (multiple chidlren) angels (multiple angels)"If he said "their angel" then that would mean they all share ONE angel. He didn't say that. He said "their angels" meaning each one has their own in heaven beholding the face of God.Do you really not understand now the English language works? If you see a group of kids playing with their own balls, each one having their own ball, you would say "their balls."If you see a group of kids playing with one ball, you would say "their ball." "Their angels" like "their balls" each one has their own. That makes no more sense than having a rally for all of the constituents in Texas and saying the term 'their Representatives' means that each and every one of us has our own in Washington. There is NO scriptural evidence that we each have our own angel in Heaven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thereselittleflower Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 58 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 5,457 Content Per Day: 1.69 Reputation: 4,220 Days Won: 37 Joined: 07/01/2015 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 There is no doctrine in Scripture that we have personal angels. Their statement only shows that these early believers still had a residue of Jewish superstitions that they had not managed to discard. Nothing in the Bible indicates that God assigns our personal angel.Bopeep, really? You strain at gnats and swallow camels? Jesus was talking about multiple children so there are multiple angels involved "Their (multiple chidlren) angels (multiple angels)"If he said "their angel" then that would mean they all share ONE angel. He didn't say that. He said "their angels" meaning each one has their own in heaven beholding the face of God.Do you really not understand now the English language works? If you see a group of kids playing with their own balls, each one having their own ball, you would say "their balls."If you see a group of kids playing with one ball, you would say "their ball." "Their angels" like "their balls" each one has their own. That makes no more sense than having a rally for all of the constituents in Texas and saying the term 'their Representatives' means that each and every one of us has our own in Washington. There is NO scriptural evidence that we each have our own angel in Heaven. But they are the representatives of those particular constituents - their representatives - and not the representatives of any other body of constituents and so those representatives are theirs (that is a possessive pronoun) and it means those representatives belong to them and are to pay attention to them exclusively.I'm just at a loss as to why simply rules of grammar don't apply to people's reading of the English language when it comes to their beliefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,992 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,690 Content Per Day: 11.77 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 There has been an obsession with angels in our world.There have been movies and television shows featuring angels.People buy angel figurines and keep them in their homes and in their cars to pray to.This is very wrong.In fact in the Bible when people bowed down to the angels they told them not to bow down to them but only to God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hippie333 Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 15 Topic Count: 114 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 1,236 Content Per Day: 0.29 Reputation: 673 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/24/2012 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/18/1970 Share Posted August 24, 2015 There is no doctrine in Scripture that we have personal angels. Their statement only shows that these early believers still had a residue of Jewish superstitions that they had not managed to discard. Nothing in the Bible indicates that God assigns our personal angel.Bopeep, really? You strain at gnats and swallow camels? Jesus was talking about multiple children so there are multiple angels involved "Their (multiple chidlren) angels (multiple angels)"If he said "their angel" then that would mean they all share ONE angel. He didn't say that. He said "their angels" meaning each one has their own in heaven beholding the face of God.Do you really not understand now the English language works? If you see a group of kids playing with their own balls, each one having their own ball, you would say "their balls."If you see a group of kids playing with one ball, you would say "their ball." "Their angels" like "their balls" each one has their own. That makes no more sense than having a rally for all of the constituents in Texas and saying the term 'their Representatives' means that each and every one of us has our own in Washington. There is NO scriptural evidence that we each have our own angel in Heaven. But they are the representatives of those particular constituents - their representatives - and not the representatives of any other body of constituents and so those representatives are theirs (that is a possessive pronoun) and it means those representatives belong to them and are to pay attention to them exclusively.I'm just at a loss as to why simply rules of grammar don't apply to people's reading of the English language when it comes to their beliefs. Let's please stop the insults.... is the number one reason threads are locked or closed. If you cannot debate the subject without insults, please remove yourself from the discussion. God Bless, Hip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thereselittleflower Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 58 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 5,457 Content Per Day: 1.69 Reputation: 4,220 Days Won: 37 Joined: 07/01/2015 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 (edited) There is no doctrine in Scripture that we have personal angels. Their statement only shows that these early believers still had a residue of Jewish superstitions that they had not managed to discard. Nothing in the Bible indicates that God assigns our personal angel.Bopeep, really? You strain at gnats and swallow camels? Jesus was talking about multiple children so there are multiple angels involved "Their (multiple chidlren) angels (multiple angels)"If he said "their angel" then that would mean they all share ONE angel. He didn't say that. He said "their angels" meaning each one has their own in heaven beholding the face of God.Do you really not understand now the English language works? If you see a group of kids playing with their own balls, each one having their own ball, you would say "their balls."If you see a group of kids playing with one ball, you would say "their ball." "Their angels" like "their balls" each one has their own. That makes no more sense than having a rally for all of the constituents in Texas and saying the term 'their Representatives' means that each and every one of us has our own in Washington. There is NO scriptural evidence that we each have our own angel in Heaven. But they are the representatives of those particular constituents - their representatives - and not the representatives of any other body of constituents and so those representatives are theirs (that is a possessive pronoun) and it means those representatives belong to them and are to pay attention to them exclusively.I'm just at a loss as to why simply rules of grammar don't apply to people's reading of the English language when it comes to their beliefs. Let's please stop the insults.... is the number one reason threads are locked or closed. If you cannot debate the subject without insults, please remove yourself from the discussion. God Bless, Hip You're right Hip. I apologize. Edited August 24, 2015 by thereselittleflower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,992 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,690 Content Per Day: 11.77 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 There is no doctrine in Scripture that we have personal angels. Their statement only shows that these early believers still had a residue of Jewish superstitions that they had not managed to discard. Nothing in the Bible indicates that God assigns our personal angel.Bopeep, really? You strain at gnats and swallow camels? Jesus was talking about multiple children so there are multiple angels involved "Their (multiple chidlren) angels (multiple angels)"If he said "their angel" then that would mean they all share ONE angel. He didn't say that. He said "their angels" meaning each one has their own in heaven beholding the face of God.Do you really not understand now the English language works? If you see a group of kids playing with their own balls, each one having their own ball, you would say "their balls."If you see a group of kids playing with one ball, you would say "their ball." "Their angels" like "their balls" each one has their own. That makes no more sense than having a rally for all of the constituents in Texas and saying the term 'their Representatives' means that each and every one of us has our own in Washington. There is NO scriptural evidence that we each have our own angel in Heaven. But they are the representatives of those particular constituents - their representatives - and not the representatives of any other body of constituents and so those representatives are theirs (that is a possessive pronoun) and it means those representatives belong to them and are to pay attention to them exclusively.I'm just at a loss as to why simply rules of grammar don't apply to people's reading of the English language when it comes to their beliefs. Let's please stop the insults.... is the number one reason threads are locked or closed. If you cannot debate the subject without insults, please remove yourself from the discussion. God Bless, Hip You're right Hip. I apologize. I forgive you too littleflower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thereselittleflower Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 58 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 5,457 Content Per Day: 1.69 Reputation: 4,220 Days Won: 37 Joined: 07/01/2015 Status: Offline Share Posted August 24, 2015 There is no doctrine in Scripture that we have personal angels. Their statement only shows that these early believers still had a residue of Jewish superstitions that they had not managed to discard. Nothing in the Bible indicates that God assigns our personal angel. Bopeep, really? You strain at gnats and swallow camels? Jesus was talking about multiple children so there are multiple angels involved "Their (multiple chidlren) angels (multiple angels)" If he said "their angel" then that would mean they all share ONE angel. He didn't say that. He said "their angels" meaning each one has their own in heaven beholding the face of God. Do you really not understand now the English language works? If you see a group of kids playing with their own balls, each one having their own ball, you would say "their balls." If you see a group of kids playing with one ball, you would say "their ball." "Their angels" like "their balls" each one has their own. That makes no more sense than having a rally for all of the constituents in Texas and saying the term 'their Representatives' means that each and every one of us has our own in Washington. There is NO scriptural evidence that we each have our own angel in Heaven. But they are the representatives of those particular constituents - their representatives - and not the representatives of any other body of constituents and so those representatives are theirs (that is a possessive pronoun) and it means those representatives belong to them and are to pay attention to them exclusively. I'm just at a loss as to why simply rules of grammar don't apply to people's reading of the English language when it comes to their beliefs. Let's please stop the insults.... is the number one reason threads are locked or closed. If you cannot debate the subject without insults, please remove yourself from the discussion. God Bless, Hip You're right Hip. I apologize. I forgive you too littleflower. Thank you Bopeep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hippie333 Posted August 24, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 15 Topic Count: 114 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 1,236 Content Per Day: 0.29 Reputation: 673 Days Won: 1 Joined: 10/24/2012 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/18/1970 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts