Which Bible Version can you recommend (KJV, NIV, NKJV, etc)

[saved34]

3 hours ago, hmbld said:

I don't understand why you post that debate is a sin in public, it must be done privately.  If one has a personal disagreement with another, then yes.  The question asked in this thread, however, was about bible versions, which is being discussed, and I fail to see how this is a private matter?  We are not debating secrets here.  Now, it appears you are making this pertain only to those who disagree with your position, as you have continued to post on this subject, which you have labeled as a debate.  Would you care to explain if I have misunderstood you?  

God bless you, as clearly you love God's Word.  

I'm sorry, hmbld, but the attitude presented by that brother is not one of love for Gods word. It is a fascination and idolization of a translation. It has also warped into presenting another Gospel as he is making the KJV a prerequisite for salvation.

His particular brand of kjv onlyism has also led him to seperate and create false divisions among brethren. Calling those who have trusted Christ, heritics, wolves, and such things shows a serious lack of maturity.

 

[ccfromsc]

12 hours ago, manuelf324 said:

Av1611 THE ONLY Bible from Antioch Textus Receptus thats not from Alexandria Nor endorsed from the Catholic Church 

Then why was it revised period? Why even correct the type then? So the KJV printed today is not the real bible as per this statement?

[ccfromsc]

22 hours ago, Butero said:

I am saying you are intentionally being misleading, which isn't that far from lying.  Being a fool has nothing to do with being a liar and a deceiver.

The KJV states twice there is no God plain and simple. You are in denial.

[ccfromsc]

13 hours ago, manuelf324 said:

Rom  1:18  For the WRATH of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;   

"DOES THE NIV SAY LOVE INSTEAD OF WRATH 

No it does not.

[hmbld]

8 minutes ago, ccfromsc said:

The KJV states twice there is no God plain and simple. You are in denial.

I don't understand what point you are trying to make.  Don't all versions say this?

[ccfromsc]

9 hours ago, Teditis said:

Assurance of Salvation shouldn't be found in the KJV of the Bible.... nor any other.

It's found in Christ alone.

It's been my experience that this is very common with KJV-only people... they're so

focused on the version that it's become their god... they idolize it.

God bless you sir. You have wisdom and understanding.

[hmbld]

4 minutes ago, Butero said:

Here is what it says in context.

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.  They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.  KJV

Fools say in their hearts, "There is no God."  They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds; there is no one who does good.  NRSV

The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."  They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good.  ESV

While the words, "There is no God" is found in the text of all of these translations, none are actually saying there is no God.  They are all clearly stating that this is what a fool says.  Any dullard knows that, including you.  I do not believe that any real Christian would make up this kind of false accusation.  It is the devil that is a liar and the Father of a lie, so it stands to reason his children would follow after his ways, as you are clearly doing. 

I really don't know what ccfromsc is trying to say here, it seems clear the text is saying the fool says . . .  

And the version does not matter, they agree.

[The_Patriot21]

If one is going to argue KJV, they are actually being hypocritical, as the KJV was not translated from the greek. It was taken entirely from the 1611 KJV. So if one wants to argue that the KJV is the only translation, then they have to be using the 1611, in order for it to be "pure". the KJV and NKJV are just watered down versions of the 1611 and therefore cannot be accurate.

[hmbld]

3 minutes ago, Butero said:

I know.  Even some of the modern version defenders came against this tactic he is using to discredit the KJV Bible.  They do all agree on this, and not one is saying there is no God.  I don't see how he thinks he is helping his side when he keeps making this ridiculous charge.  You haven't taken a scripture completely out of context like that to make your point, and nobody besides cc has either.  That is why I don't believe he is a real Christian.  You can't tell bold faced lies like that and be for real. 

Butero, I really enjoyed talking with you.  I do wish we could come to agree, lol.  God bless,

[ccfromsc]

11 minutes ago, Butero said:

While the words, "There is no God" is found in the text of all of these translations, none are actually saying there is no God.  They are all clearly stating that this is what a fool says.  Any dullard knows that, including you.  I do not believe that any real Christian would make up this kind of false accusation.  It is the devil that is a liar and the Father of a lie, so it stands to reason his children would follow after his ways, as you are clearly doing. 

Ok I was trying to get you to call me a "fool."

Why? Simple:

Matthew 5:22 (KJV)
²²  But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
 

That way your own KJV philosophy will be staring you in the face. That is your KJV Only nuttiness. Y'all idolize a book, a KJV bible. You do not care for the hearts and souls of people. Between you and Manuel whom rants like a mentally disturbed person at times, how do you expect to gain converts?