Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Graduated to Heaven
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  50
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,073
  • Content Per Day:  0.49
  • Reputation:   43
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/02/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/10/1923

Posted (edited)

It surprises me the length people will go to, to argue or try and rearrange God's word to suit their own their own life style.

Of course they will always find a few to back them up, mostly of the mormon faith as were Donny and Marie,

cheers,

eric.

Edited by eric
  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  55
  • Topic Count:  1,705
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  20,160
  • Content Per Day:  2.33
  • Reputation:   12,387
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  08/22/2001
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Proverbs 14:12, "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." According to what God says we can loose our soul by doing what seems right in our own eyes. . Men want to do things their way and as it seems right in their own eyes..

Angels :thumbsup:


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  20
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/01/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Ishah can mean woman or it can mean wife depending on the context.  When it says wife it means wife in Genesis 2.  The context distinguishes between woman and wife in that chapter.

What is it about the context which makes you think that eshah should be interpreted as wife and not woman?

The same is when using the word gune' in greek for wife in Matt 19:5-6. Jesus is quoting from that passage in Genesis.  The reference  means wife or married woman as it used in both of these OT and NT references.

Gune' can also mean either woman or wife.

Deut. 17:15-17

    Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother. [16] But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the Lord hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way. [17] Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.

Rabah, translated as multiply, means to become much or to become numerous.

The KJV rendering of b'thulaw as maid instead of virgin is incorrect. Almah could be correctly translated as maid, but not b'thulaw

Wrong. Bethulâh is derived from bâtthal, and is related to bâdal, which means "to separate.  It refers to a young maiden still living in her father's house and still a long way from being married.

Is this just your opinion, or do you have a reference?

The Brown, Driver, Briggs, Gesenius Lexicon gives no meaning other than virgin.

Amâh, on the other hand is a reference to a fully mature virgin who is  approaching the time of her marriage.  That is why almah is translated virgin in Isaiah 7:14. Mary was not a bethulah, but was a fully mature virgin betrothed and approaching the time of marriage.

The lexicon disagrees with you:

'amah {aw-maw'}

apparently a primitive word;

TWOT

- 112; n f

AV

- handmaid 22, maidservant 19, maid 8, bondwoman 4, bondmaids 2; 55

1) maid-servant, female slave, maid, handmaid, concubine

1a) of humility (fig.)

Bethulâh translated as maid is correct in Exodus 22 because it reads, "If a young man entice a maid that is not betrothed..." That is the correct rendering in English of bethulâh .

You have just contradicted your own definition of bethulah, since you said that the word means a virgin who is far from being married.

"If a man entices a virgin who isn't pledged to be married, and lies with her, he shall surely pay a dowry for her to be his wife. WEB

And if a man entice a virgin that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely pay a dowry for her to be his wife. ASV

If a man takes a virgin, who has not given her word to another man, and has connection with her, he will have to give a bride-price for her to be his wife. BBE

And if a man seduce a virgin that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall certainly endow her, to be his wife. DBY

And if a man entice a virgin that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely pay a dowry for her to be his wife. JPS

And when a man doth entice a virgin who 'is' not betrothed, and hath lain with her, he doth certainly endow her to himself for a wife; YLT

Guest shiloh357
Posted
QUOTE(shiloh357 @ Apr 4 2005, 11:17 AM)

Ishah can mean woman or it can mean wife depending on the context.

Guest Bro David™
Posted
It really is sad that this is the state of the modern church, that even "christians" think its ok to commit these abominations.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Indeed, again in a worthy enough cause when we debate the issues I am always amazed that what the Bible says so clearly could mean a totaly diff" thing to learned men/women.

With Love

David King


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  20
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/01/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Adultry constitutes ANY sex between a man or woman who are not lawfully married.

Wrong. Adultery always involves the wife of another man.

na'aph:

1) to commit adultery

.a) (Qal)

..1) to commit adultery

...a) usually of man

....1) always with wife of another

...b) adultery (of women) (participle)

..2) idolatrous worship (fig.)

.b) (Piel)

..1) to commit adultery

...a) of man

...b) adultery (of women) (participle)

..2) idolatrous worship (fig.)

It really is sad that this is the state of the modern church, that even "christians" think its ok to commit these abominations.

I am not a "christian".

Do you think it was an abomination for David to have wives and concubines?

And David took [him] more concubines and wives out of Jerusalem, after he was come from Hebron: and there were yet sons and daughters born to David.

2 Samuel 5:13

Because David did [that which was] right in the eyes of YHWH, and turned not aside from any [thing] that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.

1 Kings 15:5


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  20
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/01/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Do you think it was an abomination for David to have wives and concubines?

Yes. David was not perfect by any means.

So how do you reconcile this perceived abomination with 1 Kings 15:5?

Because David did [that which was] right in the eyes of YHWH, and turned not aside from any [thing] that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.

1 Kings 15:5.

Now you take things out of context again. Because David also took a census of Israel against the command of the Lord, for which many thousands of people died because of it.

So many times when people lose their arguments with me they trot out the tired old escape clause: "you're taking it out of context". Can you explain why you think my argument is invalid because of context?

In the Leviticus we see that if two people have consensual sex that are not married, they were to be put to death. It did not matter who they were or whether or not one or more of them was married.

Reference please.

Really what it amounts to is the same old thing, man wanting to justify himself to God.

His laws are there for a reason. The Pharisees add to the burdens of men by making the laws more difficult to keep.

Do you not read the Gospels? Jesus did away with the mere "fence laws".

What?

Not only is it a sin to have intercourse with someone other than your lawfully wedded spouse of the opposite sex, but it is also a sin to even want to do so.

Wrong. That argument depends on the definition of adultery, which does not include sex with an unmarried woman.


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  20
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/01/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)

>>Ishah can mean woman or it can mean wife depending on the context. When it says wife it means wife in Genesis 2. The context distinguishes between woman and wife in that chapter.

What is it about the context which makes you think that eshah should be interpreted as wife and not woman?

>>Because when ishah is used to denote her gender in Gen. 2:22-23, She is woman or literally "man with a womb."

Your stated reason supports the interpretation of woman rather than wife.

>>Ishah is translated as wife in v.24 when it is being used the context of her relationship as a helper to her husband. Look at how many times through the Tenach that ishah is used in reference to a married woman.

The meaning of 'married', in the Tanach, is when a man has dominion over a woman (Isaiah 62:5).

This [is] the thing which YHWH doth command concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, saying, Let them marry to whom they think best; only to the family of the tribe of their father shall they marry.

In this verse marry is a translation of ishah.

>>The same is when using the word gune' in greek for wife in Matt 19:5-6. Jesus is quoting from that passage in Genesis. The reference means wife or married woman as it used in both of these OT and NT references.

Gune' can also mean either woman or wife.

>>gune' can mean one of three things. It can denote an unmarried virgin, a married woman or a widow.

gune can also mean an unmarried woman who is not a virgin:

Woman

(From International Standard Bible Encyclopedia)

woom'-an ('ishshah, "a woman" (feminine of 'ish, "a man"); gune, "a woman" "wife"):

>>[17] Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.

Rabah, translated as multiply, means to become much or to become numerous.

>>Yeah, and your point is...?

That the prohibition was against numerous wives rather than more than one.

The KJV rendering of b'thulaw as maid instead of virgin is incorrect. Almah could be correctly translated as maid, but not b'thulaw

>>In old KJV, Elizabethan English, a maid (or maiden) WAS a virgin. They had a term called "old maid." It meant a woman who had never married, and had never lain with a man. So splitting hairs over "virgin" or "maid" is kind of silly.

Hoverever, in contemporary Eniglish the meaning is different, in that is not apparent that a maid should be a virgin.

The KJV rendering of b'thulaw as maid instead of virgin is incorrect. Almah could be correctly translated as maid, but not b'thulaw

>>Wrong. Bethulâh is derived from bâtthal, and is related to bâdal, which means "to separate. It refers to a young maiden still living in her father's house and still a long way from being married.

Is this just your opinion, or do you have a reference?

>>I am Jewish, and I study and speak Hebrew. There is no "opinion" where Hebrew is concerned. Hebrew is a very precise language, and there are few lexicons or

dictionaries that do it justice.

>>Amâh, on the other hand is a reference to a fully mature virgin who is approaching the time of her marriage. That is why almah is translated virgin in Isaiah 7:14. Mary was not a bethulah, but was a fully mature virgin betrothed and approaching the time of marriage.

The following text is also from a Jew who speaks Hebrew:

This Hebrew word ha

Edited by traveller

  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  20
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/01/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: 28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

So again, not only is it a sin to do the physical act, but is a sin to even want to. Jesus defined adultery as "Looking at a person and thinking in your heart, 'they are fine, I wouldn't mind having them alone for a while.'"

If your interpretation were correct, it would be adultery for a man to lust after his wife.

Dueteronomy 22:20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: 21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.

What was her sin?

"to play the whore in her father's house"

1) to commit fornication, be a harlot, play the harlot

.a) (Qal)

..1) to be a harlot, act as a harlot, commit fornication

..2) to commit adultery

..3) to be a cult prostitute

..4) to be unfaithful (to God) (fig.)

.b) (Pual) to play the harlot

.c) (Hiphil)

..1) to cause to commit adultery

..2) to force into prostitution

..3) to commit fornication

I interpret this as meaning that she was unfaithful to her father because she was under his authority while she was in his house.

Was she literally prostituting herself for gain? Not necessarily. But she is convicted of whoredom on the basis of loss of virginity before marriage.

Yes, but within the context of being given in marriage to a man who expected her to be a virgin.

Friend, that is about as blunt as it can get that sex outside marriage is a sin.

No, you have generalised a particular case.


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  20
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/01/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
"fornication", according to Strongs includes, but is not limited to:

adultery.

Premarital sex.

Lust.

Harlotry.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Fornication is not defined by the Strongs definition of zanah.

The meaning of fornication is derived from fornix, meaning brothel.

There is no reference to premarital sex or lust in the Strongs definition.

Paul's fornication is derived from the Greek porneo, meaning sexual immorality.

The code of sexual morality is defined by the Torah, which does not forbid sex outside of marriage. This is evidenced by the lack of any explicit commandment to this effect and the fact that David had both wives and concubines, and this was not considered to be an offence per 1 Kings 15:5.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...