Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  52
  • Topic Count:  88
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  4,064
  • Content Per Day:  1.20
  • Reputation:   3,748
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  02/23/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
2 minutes ago, Davida said:

Lol double post !!

Well,now she definitely won't have to wonder what post is being referred to,lol


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  96
  • Topic Count:  332
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  19,073
  • Content Per Day:  4.42
  • Reputation:   28,667
  • Days Won:  331
  • Joined:  08/03/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Quote

 thought so too, then when I hesitated ministering to a woman, the pastor rebuked me                                 tryler

Hmmm,thats a bit disappointing although I don't know all the particulars......but ,yes I do agree with you


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  96
  • Topic Count:  332
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  19,073
  • Content Per Day:  4.42
  • Reputation:   28,667
  • Days Won:  331
  • Joined:  08/03/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Quote

This is where this whole thing began, Kwik.                                  Davida

Thanks Sis......Oh dear,well I was not about to read 5 pages there or 14 here,Arphaxad put up a nice OP......And again,I don't think its about "trust" or "lack of".....its about having respect for your spouse that no one else may think(or imagine  or 'say") you are dishonoring them & thats simply because you love them & are an honorable individual with common decency...I think very highly of my husband and would not want anyone to think he was being made to look foolish,its just disrespectful imo

THe funny thing is that I've been single many many years and have "single"Brothers-in -Christ that have been my dear friends for 35 years,they are still my dear friends but things have changed .....and because they are my dear friends they respect my husband as much as they do me.....there is not any good reason we would have for dining alone.....& I might add that my husband is in Australia and I'm in America,one Brother did join me for my birthday,for a meal someone gifted me with,I did not want to go alone,I was not feeling well enough to drive     His wife was going out of town & it was her suggestion he  accompany me,my husband was thrilled I got to redeem my gift instead of staying in the sick bed alone on  my birthday ......busy place,early dinner,special circumstance

Guest shiloh357
Posted
5 minutes ago, kwikphilly said:

Thanks Sis......Oh dear,well I was not about to read 5 pages there or 14 here,Arphaxad put up a nice OP......And again,I don't think its about "trust" or "lack of".....its about having respect for your spouse that no one else may think(or imagine  or 'say") you are dishonoring them & thats simply because you love them & are an honorable individual with common decency...I think very highly of my husband and would not want anyone to think he was being made to look foolish,its just disrespectful imo

THe funny thing is that I've been single many many years and have "single"Brothers-in -Christ that have been my dear friends for 35 years,they are still my dear friends but things have changed .....and because they are my dear friends they respect my husband as much as they do me.....there is not any good reason we would have for dining alone.....& I might add that my husband is in Australia and I'm in America,one Brother did join me for my birthday,for a meal someone gifted me with,I did not want to go alone,I was not feeling well enough to drive     His wife was going out of town & it was her suggestion he  accompany me,my husband was thrilled I got to redeem my gift instead of staying in the sick bed alone on  my birthday ......busy place,early dinner,special circumstance

Kwik, If a man who is married is having dinner at a restaurant  with a woman who is not his wife, and chooses to have a third party present at the meal to avoid any appearance of an affair, is he sexist (regardless what kind of restaurant it is) Is he demeaning the other woman?   I ask because that is partly what is being asserted by at least one other poster. What do you think?


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.25
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 minute ago, shiloh357 said:

Kwik, If a man who is married is having dinner at a restaurant with a woman who is not his wife, and chooses to have a third party present at the meal to avoid any appearance of an affair, is he sexist?   Is he demeaning the other woman?   I ask because that is partly what is being asserted by at least one other poster. What do you think?

It is ok if you use my name, I will not complain.  It sounds better than "one other poster"...just saying


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.25
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
4 minutes ago, Davida said:

I would think it is respectful and not demeaning in any way to have another present, to claim it is demeaning sounds like of those ridiculous feminist opinions- like holding open a door is insulting to a woman and all that none sense. :P

I hold the door for everybody, male and female.  Why single out one group for different treatment? 


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.25
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
15 minutes ago, Davida said:

Not at all my point, but deflection.

It is not a deflection, it is the whole mindset that I have been talking about.   I know men today that will gladly hold a door for a woman and would not do it for a man if the building was on fire (that is a bit of hyperbole, but you get my meaning).  

Why not if you happen to be the first one to the door and there are 4 or 5 people close behind you, hold it for all of them?  Is that not a better way to do things than to single out one gender over the other?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  2,155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  51,427
  • Content Per Day:  11.39
  • Reputation:   31,568
  • Days Won:  240
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
8 hours ago, HisFirst said:

The brand is called So..? and the "So..? Sinful" fragrance is just another scent in the range.  

There's also So...Eternal.

images.jpg

I do not wear perfume because it usually gives me a headache. Interesting container :blink:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.09
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.76
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 hour ago, shiloh357 said:

Kwik, If a man who is married is having dinner at a restaurant  with a woman who is not his wife, and chooses to have a third party present at the meal to avoid any appearance of an affair, is he sexist (regardless what kind of restaurant it is) Is he demeaning the other woman?   I ask because that is partly what is being asserted by at least one other poster. What do you think?

Well if anyone ask me. I don't think it is sexist. I think it is a personal issue between a husband and wife.  


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.09
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.76
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
33 minutes ago, Running Gator said:

It is not a deflection, it is the whole mindset that I have been talking about.   I know men today that will gladly hold a door for a woman and would not do it for a man if the building was on fire (that is a bit of hyperbole, but you get my meaning).  

Why not if you happen to be the first one to the door and there are 4 or 5 people close behind you, hold it for all of them?  Is that not a better way to do things than to single out one gender over the other?

Well I hold the door for every one cause I think it is the Christian thing to do. Then at times I have become the "door holder" and I stand there while I watch a line of people go pass me cause I held the door open for one person. Oh well I say. :noidea:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...