how would you interpret this?

[creativemechanic]

[creativemechanic]

48 minutes ago, Yowm said:

It is suggesting that the artist (not the art) is being subjective. The art is playing on iron clad stereotypes so there is no guessing. 

The artist is showing a double minded person, most likely a veiled attack on the hypocrisy of 'Christian' hypocrites.

I'm thinking so

OR

if u look,she looks somewhat older in the pic.  maybe that  she  was like that younger and it shows God's power to change 

 

[Max Purl]

This shows the result of programming by the enemy's puppets, mainly Hollywood today, upon humanity over time.

[creativemechanic]

11 hours ago, Max Purl said:

This shows the result of programming by the enemy's puppets, mainly Hollywood today, upon humanity over time.

how

[Not me]

13 hours ago, creativemechanic said:

Humanity trying to serve God. 

Much love in Christ, Not me

[GreyDestiny]

One has the choice to either do good or to do evil.

Think of it like the 'many worlds" idea. You wake up one morning and have a choice: do I want pancakes, or would I rather eat French toast? If you make the choice to eat pancakes, that opens up a new world where you eventually end up being an accountant that wears silly ties to work. If you choose French toast, you open up a world where you end up in jail for assault. Thus, many worlds, butterfly effect kind of thing.

To many, the thought of them having an evil opposing self is unthinkable. I like to try and think back to where, if I hadn't made the choice to try and change, where would I be right now? All I can think of is that i'd still be way, way down deep in sin and i'd probably either be dead or in prison, maybe even taking my own life. 

So, this picture speaks to me of the good half and the evil half of this woman. If she chooses to do good, she is a modest dresser, doesn't drink, and avidly attends church. If she chooses to do evil, she wears revealing tops, likely drinks profusely, and gets a thrill out of meaningless... Casual encounters.

[Adstar]

I believe from scriptures that::

We have the choice to either love what is evil or love what is good..

We have the choice to hate what is evil or hate what is good..

We have the choice to accept Gods will or reject Gods will..

The picture to me reveals the war within us all..

But which side to we love and which side do we hate?  That's the critical question..

Romans chapter 7 gives light to this struggle..

But while we struggle if we love the truth of the LORD Jesus Christ He will have the victory with us..

 

 

[Heleadethme]

Fight the good fight of faith, carry your cross, and one day we just won't want that evil life any more.  Just not interested, thanks anyway.    Because we died to it.

[LadyKay]

13 hours ago, Max Purl said:

This shows the result of programming by the enemy's puppets, mainly Hollywood today, upon humanity over time.

Explain please. 

[pg4Him]

It really doesn't matter what we see in it or what we think it means. Eisegesis is never much more than an exercise in personal indulgence. The only reality is what the artist intended to say. If this artist has no particular message and wants to provoke us all to eisegesis, it means the artist is using the art as a social experiment.

If someone is naturally critical or judgmental, they will "see" a hypocrite. If someone is naturally pragmatic, they will see flawed humanity colliding with the divine. If someone is naturally diplomatic, they will see transformation.

This is a social experiment designed to "teach you something about yourself" depending on how you react.