God used Evolution to 'create' man

[The Barbarian]

3 hours ago, Jonathan BeWell said:

Because there is no such thing as evolution,

It's observed daily.  Do you remember when you learned what evolution is?   Remember?  "A change in allele frequency in a population over time."  Or less precisely, "descent with modification."  That's constantly observed.    No point in denying an observed fact.   Perhaps you've confused evolution with natural selection or common descent.

3 hours ago, Jonathan BeWell said:

... and are still right about

Nope.  It's all genetic, not humoral, and therefore like sorting beads, not like mixing paint.

3 hours ago, Jonathan BeWell said:

I choose God's truth, light, love, sacrifice and bond service. 

If you do, then you should embrace the truth, not fear it.

3 hours ago, Jonathan BeWell said:

5 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

Energy, applied with intelligence, is necessary to reverse the ever-increasing

... degeneration of man's genes, faith, morality, love and self-destructive nature.

You've misquoted me there.    I'm sure you meant no dishonesty, but please correct the false statement.

YE creattionist Kurt Wise writes:

Evidence for not just one but for all three of the species level and above types of stratomorphic intermediates expected by macroevolutionary theory is surely strong evidence for macroevolutionary theory. Creationists therefore need to accept this fact. It certainly CANNOT be said that traditional creation theory expected (predicted) any of these fossil finds.

YE Creationist Dr. Kurt Wise  Toward a Creationist Understanding of Transitional Forms  (my emphasis)

https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j09_2/j09_2_216-222.pdf

3 hours ago, Jonathan BeWell said:

You will have to explain yourself on this one, Groo, your crack team just has their perception skewed by dirty broken glasses.

Wise is a YE creationist.   He on your team.   He's just an honest YE creationist.   

[HAZARD]

17 hours ago, one.opinion said:

Of course - there are many questions still to be resolved. This was of course true in Darwin’s day, but questions are still present. That doesn’t mean that evidence is insufficient to support the theory.

Don't be discouraged poor little fly, you'll be a chipmunk by and by,
Ages later we can see, you'll be a full grown chimpanzee,
Next we see with a prophets ken, you'll take your place in the ranks of men.
And then in the great sweet by and by, we'll all be angels you and I.
Why should I swat you, dear little fly? Prospective chum of my home on high,
This is what Darwin says, not I.

[one.opinion]

14 minutes ago, HAZARD said:

Don't be discouraged poor little fly, you'll be a chipmunk by and by,
Ages later we can see, you'll be a full grown chimpanzee,
Next we see with a prophets ken, you'll take your place in the ranks of men.
And then in the great sweet by and by, we'll all be angels you and I.
Why should I swat you, dear little fly? Prospective chum of my home on high,
This is what Darwin says, not I.

That's cute and funny :-) Chime in with evidence, if you'd like.

[HAZARD]

19 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

That's cute and funny :-) Chime in with evidence, if you'd like.

John 1:3, All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. We can either believe God or believe the devil, God or Devilution. I believe God.

[one.opinion]

1 hour ago, HAZARD said:

John 1:3, All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. We can either believe God or believe the devil, God or Devilution. I believe God.

Why would you possibly think I disagree with anything in John 1? I know I have never said any such thing.

[HAZARD]

1 minute ago, one.opinion said:

Why would you possibly think I disagree with anything in John 1? I know I have never said any such thing.

I never said you disagree with John 1, all I am saying is evolution is a lie. God created everything, nothing was made that was not made by Him.

[one.opinion]

3 minutes ago, HAZARD said:

God created everything, nothing was made that was not made by Him.

Very good! We can certainly agree on this!

[The Barbarian]

Barbarian suggests:

then you should embrace the truth, not fear it.

(random Bible verse offered)

I'm not suggesting that the Bible says you'll go to hell for ignoring the truth.   I'm suggesting that you shouldn't fear the truth.

[one.opinion]

3 hours ago, Jonathan BeWell said:

 

 

2 Thessalonians 2:9-13 King James Version (KJV)

⁹ Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

¹⁰ And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

¹¹ And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

¹² That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

¹³ But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth:

I understand that you do not accept the scientific evidence for evolution. I cannot blame you, because I also did not accept it for much of my life. However, if you are implying that beliefs that do not match yours are inherently unrighteous, then you are placing your beliefs on a pedestal constructed of false pride.

[omega2xx]

On 10/29/2019 at 11:09 PM, one.opinion said:

Are you aware that the original Hebrew words do not specify that the flood covered the entire globe, even though there are other Hebrew words that could have done that?"

 

"So the Bible does not actually specify a global flood, and the scientific evidence for a global flood is lacking. There is NO reason why doubting a global flood should be equated with rejecting the Word of God."

 

 

On 10/29/2019 at 11:09 PM, one.opinion said:

This is extremely judge mental and not based on reality. There are literally millions around the world that accept the scientific evidence for evolution and accept Jesus Christ as Savior.

What are these words?

While the text does not use he word "global,"  the context indicates it was global.  Also there are Christians scientist far more qualified than you are on this subject who say it was global, and they provide some evidence.

What you consider reality, does not mean it is reality. 

I doubt if you can support there are millions of Christians that accept evolution.