Jump to content
IGNORED

Blind backsliding


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.92
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, Firm Foundation said:

The Bible warns us not to place a stumbling block in front of others.

Okay. You are going to have to explain to me  how women wearing pants is placing a stumbling block in front of you. Cause if that is the case for you, how are you able to leave your house?  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.92
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, Firm Foundation said:

It's a stumbling block to other women who would dress in masculine apparel and sin.

I'm sorry. I don't get it. I have no desire to look like a man, even if I do wear pants. In fact if I was mistaken for a man I would be horrified! Any women would.   :31:

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  43
  • Topic Count:  229
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  10,900
  • Content Per Day:  2.91
  • Reputation:   12,145
  • Days Won:  68
  • Joined:  02/13/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1954

20200118_181511.jpg

This cartoon is just... Twisted. The scripture has no true relativity to it. Not really. The reason is due to the fact that the verse is pertaining to a confrontation with another in Christ. This one doesn't at all. And the guy is planning on getting drunk, then also has strong sexual overtones to it.  Sorry - weird. 

Edited by BeauJangles
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  133
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  2,864
  • Content Per Day:  0.61
  • Reputation:   2,596
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  08/07/2011
  • Status:  Offline

I honestly don't think that is the issue ladykay, I am more inclined to think that there is too much focus on what others are doing. Like the pic in the op. Its easy to point out the flaws in others while ignoring our own. To me, it comes down to the saying... “do as I tell you to, think as I tell you to. Not as I do “ Our job isn't to be clothing police, or morality cops and brow beat people into biblical submission to our way of thinking. But to share the gospel. So my question to some of these folks... is... which is a bigger problem. Unbelief in the savior or a woman wearing pants.

  • Well Said! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  68
  • Topic Count:  186
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  14,257
  • Content Per Day:  3.32
  • Reputation:   16,675
  • Days Won:  30
  • Joined:  08/14/2012
  • Status:  Offline

14 hours ago, Firm Foundation said:

Absolutely not.  Should a man wear a dress to church?  Everyone should be modest.

Being modest is wearing loose woman's jeans instead of skin tight tights.  I really don't mind a Scotsman wearing his kilt even if he has knobby knees.   In Jesus' day the only separating woman and mens clothing was that a man had fringes or tassels on the corners of his robe if I remember right.  So I always proclaim that there are no tassels on my bath robe.  Men in our church wear jeans or hiking shorts, a clean shirt and either tennis shoes, sandals or boots.  That way people are not dressing to be seen by people and all are made to feel welcome even if they can't afford formal clothing.  God doesn't look at the outward appearance but looks at our hearts.

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • This is Worthy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  43
  • Topic Count:  229
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  10,900
  • Content Per Day:  2.91
  • Reputation:   12,145
  • Days Won:  68
  • Joined:  02/13/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1954

3 minutes ago, Willa said:

 I really don't mind a Scotsman wearing his kilt even if he has knobby knees. 

That's funny! 

1304757990_slaphappysmiley.gif.57c859c798ce289766c4ee57c8d6ed38.gif

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  11
  • Topic Count:  86
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  813
  • Content Per Day:  0.20
  • Reputation:   516
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/02/2013
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/03/1987

8 hours ago, Abby-Joy said:
I came form a very controlling religious group where all women and girls could wear were dress, skirts and "split skirts" .... so when the girls were playing on the playground at the parochial school, running or swinging... the little boys (or whoever pleased) could see up past their knees.... VERY inappropiate!!   What to do??  Forbid little girls from running or swinging on the playground?  Or give them separate playtimes??  I guess.... ??  What if it was a windy day and they are walking out to meet their parents in the parking lot after school and the wind catches their skirt??  Decency should be a consideration ... dresses and split skirts alone don't meet that requirement....and in my opinion, this is a SAFETY issue.... little girls and women too, for that matter... should be protected from prying eyes of MEN.  
 
What would be wrong with adding some sort of "pants" under the dresses?  Or shorts under the "split skirts"?   But no ... that is "wrong" ... by man's made up rules!!  I'm fed up with religious rules that have absolutely NO common sense or Biblical basis whatsoever.  

yes. they call them culottes at my church

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  43
  • Topic Count:  229
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  10,900
  • Content Per Day:  2.91
  • Reputation:   12,145
  • Days Won:  68
  • Joined:  02/13/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1954

5 hours ago, Abby-Joy said:

I thought so too, lolgiggle-chuckle-laugh-2.jpg.e2ac6349ea6e1627dbe3a81e512c50fa.jpg

Oh, very cool emoji. I'll take it. Thanks!

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  43
  • Topic Count:  229
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  10,900
  • Content Per Day:  2.91
  • Reputation:   12,145
  • Days Won:  68
  • Joined:  02/13/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1954

On 3/3/2020 at 4:38 PM, maryjayne said:

You have topless women in church in the US?

(see, I didnt mention trousers)

 

On 3/3/2020 at 6:08 PM, OneLight said:

I was seeing the same thing also.  The shirt should of been a different color than flesh.

 

On 3/3/2020 at 6:19 PM, DustyRoad said:

I notice the same thing as @maryjayne and @OneLight did… the female figure appears shirtless. :noidea:

 

On 3/3/2020 at 6:59 PM, OneLight said:

My eyes are not that good and her hands and neck looked like shadows, not a different color of skin.

Looks like enough confirmation on that. I think it appears to be a skin tight blouse. More color to confirm it is one is obviously in order. Sorry, no offense to the optser. These cartoons do bash the guys, but trash the women. I find it in inappropriate taste. 

  • Thumbs Up 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  43
  • Topic Count:  229
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  10,900
  • Content Per Day:  2.91
  • Reputation:   12,145
  • Days Won:  68
  • Joined:  02/13/2014
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1954

16 minutes ago, Abby-Joy said:

I have tons of good ones, actually ...is there a thread for sharing cool emojis?

I dunno, but it's a terrific idea. Perhaps a stir of interest is in order.

 1190756124_hmmsmiley.gif.c5676a1c9d8c29bcadb9beadf2fe8e0b.gif

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...