Climate Change Is Extremely Political And Agenda Serving, Unfortunately It Is Also True

[one.opinion]

1 hour ago, Not of the World said:

Nowhere did I say it's false but, yes, I am highly skeptical of such claims, particularly as the Washington establishment invests in the EV industry.

I'm not a climate scientist either (I'm a molecular microbiologist), but I do know of several Christian men and women that work in the field. We should all have some skepticism when such monumental changes are suggested, but I do want to assure you that this is not just the ravings of a bunch of atheist scientists. While the dire consequences are frequently overblown, particularly by the media, there is very good evidence suggesting that climate change is happening and human activity is the largest driving force.

1 hour ago, Not of the World said:

By the way, I realize that I have come off as rhetorical and smug.  Please accept my apology. 

I appreciate the apology, although hardly necessary. I'm well acquainted with responding with words and tone that I regret later.

[Sparks]

19 hours ago, one.opinion said:

So you don’t understand any of the data, but have concluded it must be false because “the world” believes it. That is some incredibly weak evidence to build a belief - let alone one you are apparently 100% certain of.

When the IPCC 'scientists' were caught altering climate data (email hacked is the source), was that incredibly weak evidence that they cheat, or strong?

[David1701]

On 11/2/2022 at 6:49 PM, Not of the World said:

The world telling us it is.  

The other poster is attempting to shift the burden of proof...

[one.opinion]

1 hour ago, Sparks said:

When the IPCC 'scientists' were caught altering climate data (email hacked is the source), was that incredibly weak evidence that they cheat, or strong?

Is this another complaint about the IPCC that will disappear when pressed for evidence, like your claim that the IPCC predicted that Florida would be underwater by now?

[Sparks]

1 hour ago, one.opinion said:

Is this another complaint about the IPCC that will disappear when pressed for evidence, like your claim that the IPCC predicted that Florida would be underwater by now?

Are you covering for Al Gore and the IPCC who said it, but what they predicted didn't happen?  The footage is in a movie and a book by Al, you know. 

So, I guess you have not heard of Climate Gate and Climate Gate II?  CNN would not cover that so that, so you will have to go outside your comfort zone and look.  When you catch up, be sure to answer my previous question. 

If you look on Wikipedia, they have spun what happened to make you feel better. 

[one.opinion]

1 hour ago, Sparks said:

Are you covering for Al Gore and the IPCC who said it, but what they predicted didn't happen?

Asking for evidence isn't the same as covering for someone. That's a bit of an odd conclusion.

[Sparks]

59 minutes ago, one.opinion said:

Asking for evidence isn't the same as covering for someone. That's a bit of an odd conclusion.

My conclusion was that Al Gore and the IPCC made a public prediction about Florida, and it has failed.  You could crack a book or watch a movie segment on places like YouTube.

It's good that you agree with me concerning the Climate Gates I and II, based on your silence. 

[one.opinion]

15 minutes ago, Sparks said:

My conclusion was that Al Gore and the IPCC made a public prediction about Florida, and it has failed.

For some reason, you’ve never actually presented evidence that the IPCC predicted that Florida would be underwater by now. It’s just so curious.

[Sparks]

1 minute ago, one.opinion said:

For some reason, you’ve never actually presented evidence that the IPCC predicted that Florida would be underwater by now. It’s just so curious.

Yeah, because it is too simple for you to look up.  I don't need to show evidence for this public claim, and obviously, Florida is just fine.  What's curious is that you seem to be so misinformed about it.  Didn't you watch Al Gores movie a few times? 

Again, more silence on the Climate Gate I and II. 

[one.opinion]

34 minutes ago, Sparks said:

Yeah, because it is too simple for you to look up.

“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”