Climate Change Is Extremely Political And Agenda Serving, Unfortunately It Is Also True

[ChristB4us]

21 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

That's the funny thing about reality; it doesn't care what we think.

This is why you should read the literature, not "science" from denier who want to prove themselves right.    The thing about journals is, if the results can't be duplicated by others, the author's career is usually over.

Decades ago, Dr. Hanson of NASA made a prediction as to climate using only carbon dioxide emissions as a guide.    He presented three scenarios, depending on what, if anything we did to control it.    His prediction was remarkably accurate.

So it's mostly carbon emissions.

When someone created the theory of spontaneous generation, it took someone else to disprove it.  It wasn't that all scientists at that time did it, it was just that one.

Now from the article you had quoted, it does not read like others had tested it when it was in light of three scenarios that he had presented.

It would be better if you had actually cited someone else proving it. 

But as it is, with woke agenda governing the internet, our education system and the scientific field, I have to wonder if any one is being truly impartial to proving or disproving anything in these latter days.

Money is being made for climate control & these woke companies & leaders for global change for that end are a bunch of hypocrites and liars for the love of money in case you had not noticed.  They never practice what they push on others to do.

Walmart, Target dropped from national recycling program

Ever noticed the complaint against John Kerry in 

The Insufferable Hypocrisy of John Kerry

So if that scientific report is true, why are the ones pushing it are not really serious about it?  I mean really.  The convenience of the psychiatric field for creating this gender dysphoria as a mental illness and then dropping it as a mental illness ought to tell you something.

No Biological Evidence For ‘Gender Identity’ Exists, Group Of Scientists, Researchers Says

I say that the cause of global warming is not carbon emission but God.

Psalm 47:9The princes of the people are gathered together, even the people of the God of Abraham: for the shields of the earth belong unto God: he is greatly exalted.

What purpose does Satan has for making people believe there are other causes for global warming?  So they do not see they are making God angry & He is coming to judge the earth.

[ChristB4us]

21 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

Not unexpected.   This was actually predicted in the late 1800s by a scientist who realized that CO2 levels would affect global temperatures.   Hanson was testing his hypothesis.   Which turned out to be right.

There were at least two other independent studies that did just that.   Would you like to see their results?

That would be better.

I would have to wonder why that scientist in the 1800's would even consider the idea other than just by living in the city, but to consider it as affecting global temperatures seems a bit of a stretch for him to go there.

James Hansen's Climate Warning, 30 Years Later

May I offer a different cause for global warming?  God getting mad as the sins of the world is increasing & apostasy abounding more and more in churches.

For that uptick in volcanos activities in around 1905 we do see this:

The Welch Revival ( 1904-1905 ) started that apostate movement when culminated in Azusa Street Revival in 1906-1908.  

The American Revival of 1904-1905

Azusa Street Revival of 1906-1909

So maybe carbon emission is just a coincidence?  It's not like they measured the CO2 level of the whole planet but just see an increase in temperature.  Is that just like assuming him to be true by seeing his predictions of global temperatures getting warmer?  We can see the prophesies regarding that in the coming great tribulation.

 

[ChristB4us]

22 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

Yeah, in the 1800s, "races" meant "species."    Darwin actually didn't say anything about humans in that book.   But some dishonest people correctly assumed you didn't know that, and... well, you know.

Fact is, Darwin infuriated racists of his time by saying that if one imported "savages" to England, in a few generations, they'd be just like Englishmen.   The guys who fooled you, figured you didn't know that, either.

No, that's wrong, too.  In fact, Darwinists like Reginald Punnett showed, using evolutionary theory, that Hitler's racial ideas were not just evil; they were scientifically incorrect.   Would you like to see that?

And since Hitler explicitly rejected any idea of humans evolving, it's pretty hard for anyone to sell the idea that Darwin's ideas helped form the Nazi ideology.   After all, Hitler's ideology was about other humans, not other living things.

Eugenicists like ICR co-founder Henry Tinkel were enthusiastic followers of some of Hitler's ideas, but rejected actually killing "inferior" humans.    Tinkle was just in favor of sterilizing them or otherwise preventing them from reproducing:

https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/05/dr-west-meet-dr.html

This is one of the major differences that creationists have with science.   As late as the 1990s, one ICR leader was still writing about how inferior black people supposed are.   And no, not all creationists today are racists and/or eugenicists.   Many now reject this fundamental part of creationism.

Guide to the classics: Darwin’s On the Origin of Species

...Darwin originally intended to include a chapter on human evolution but later decided against it. As a result, the descent of Homo sapiens does not really feature in this elaborate discussion of the forces that drive the evolution of species.

Darwin obviously considered the book controversial enough without agitating his readers unnecessarily by touching on human evolution. And his instincts did not betray him: Right from the day of its publication, the book became something of a bestseller. Also right from the start, it elicited mixed responses. Some saw it for the foundational work of the biological sciences it eventually became. Others decried it as a serious threat to the core of humanity.

Darwin eventually came to address human evolution in a separate volume, entitled The Descent of Man. Published in 1871, 12 years after On the Origin of Species, this book offered a detailed discussion of man’s descent from ape-like ancestors as well as the link between sexual selection and human race. Invariably, perhaps, its publication caused a fresh wave of outrage, criticism, and debate. By then, however, Darwin’s theory had already become accepted in certain parts of academe and beyond.  ~~ end of quote from link

I am dubious about how the author of this article knew that Darwin originally intended to include a chapter on human evolution, and one would think he would have provided some evidence to that effect other than referring to the next book Darwin had written as if inferring that he was meaning to do that for the first book.

Anyway, I am sure after that second book, a lot of readers are reading that into the first book.

As for Hitler, like the Bible, false teachers take what they want from the scripture out of context for their false teaching and so one cannot say he did not use, let alone be not influenced by Darwinism.

I cannot post a link to a video here and so I will just suggest the film that is available at YouTube under the title of "Expelled:  No Intelligence Allowed".  It is 1 hour and 38 minutes long.  Only God can lead you to watch it and give your review about it, probably in another thread, if He leads you to do it.

Otherwise, I point out that the devil is using the evolution theory in a multiple ways and one of them is to demote the soul of that human being in the womb as a fetus, just a lump of flesh.  Kind of convenient for the people behind the Georgia Guidestones to grab hold of that and promote abortion by.

[ChristB4us]

22 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

No idea.   Maybe you should start a new thread on that.

I am on moderation and so I do not know if I can post a new thread and copy the link and post it here while it is pending or not.

So I shall just post a link;  no need for a reply to take this thread further off topic as it is self explanatory.

Georgia Guidestones

Just think of it as a footnote to better understanding my references to it in our discussion.

 

[ChristB4us]

22 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

That's easy to test.  Let's look at the data:

For the month of March, “unvaccinated people 12 years and older had 17 times the rate of COVID-associated deaths, compared to people vaccinated with a primary series and a booster dose,” says Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service commander Heather Scobie, deputy team lead for surveillance and analytics at the CDC’s Epidemiology Task Force.* “Unvaccinated people had eight times the rate of death as compared to people who only had a primary series,” suggesting that boosters increase the level of protection.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-compare-covid-deaths-for-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-people/

Those are pretty strong odds against the unvaccinated.

How about an updated result since this was "By Amanda Montañez, Tanya Lewis on June 7, 2022" of last year.

Look at the result later on at November 20, 2022.

Why Do Vaccinated People Represent Most COVID-19 Deaths Right Now?

They do approach the question why in that article.

Anyway, seems like a way to kill more people by that vaccine.  

I may be paranoid, but that doesn't mean they are not out to get us.

Jesus is Lord anyway.  As iniquity increases, the time for Him to appear to judge His House first at the pre great tribulation rapture in leaving those saints found in iniquity behind, then afterward, He will judged the world by that fiery calamity on a third of the earth.  I am sure the devil will try to cover that up too with a nuclear war.

[ChristB4us]

22 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

Not surprising, since it wasn't spread by inhalation.

Covid 19 is a variation of SARS.

Variants of the Virus

Covid 19 has been breaking out on the other side of the world that the CDC should have been on top of it in restricting travels and yet added with WHO, that did not even happen. 

When WHO began being politicized for accepting transgenderism, & dropping it as a mental illness, I cannot help but wonder that it is just a machine to push the vaccine to get it to those that would have otherwise have died from that virus.

A French Laurette stated that it is a mistake to do a global vaccination because you get variants that way.  Then the world pop up another scientist/doctor claiming there is no evidence of that and yet at that time there we are with variants.  Just lie to our faces as if it wasn't happening.  Like Wal-Mart respect for the individual and open door policy;  while they do not really respect you when they are ripping you off of your rightful pay with a different pay scale rate in the same store and sales bonus check.

In this article dispelling the rumor about him ever saying that those vaccinated will die in two years, they did report what he did actually say.

FACT CHECK: No, Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier DID NOT say all those vaccinated for COVID will die in 2 years

Who is Luc Montagnier and what did he say?
Luc Montagnier was the joint recipient (along with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Harald Zur Hausen) of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 

The Nobel laureate has called mass vaccination against coronavirus during the pandemic “unthinkable”. He categorically said that this mass vaccination drive while the pandemic rages is a historic blunder that is “creating the variants”. He has blamed the vaccination drive's timing for the ongoing deaths due to the disease, alleging that the virus is emerging stronger due to a phenomenon called "antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)".

Signs of the times.

Best be praying to Jesus Christ, trusting Him to have you abiding in Him & His words in truth in discerning good & evil and departing from iniquity with His help.

 

[ChristB4us]

23 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

You might be really upset to learn that the Human Genome Project discovered that there are no biological human races.    There is more genetic variation within and "race" you might define, than between those "races."    Race is a cultural construct.

Would you like to learn about that?

Seeing how there are any different line of thinking these days even when it comes to applying scriptures out of context for false teachings, I will not be surprised but I believe the Bibel that there is only one human race and no matter the color of anyone's skin, we are all of one race, the human race as I believe we are all descendants of Noah and his family being the only survivors of the Biblical global flood.

Quote

As we discussed, 19th century scientists used "races" as taxonomic groups of animals and plants.   Darwin had nothing to say about humans in that book.    Again, don't let those guys fool you about things like this.

Do you acknowledge Darwin's second book being on human descent?

Quote

Does seem a little weird that God would send all those earthquakes to a world at peace, and then slow them to a small number after the world entered a great war.  Seems exactly the opposite of what a just God would do, doesn't it?

Well in light of the falling away from the faith per that Welch Revival 1904-1905 and that Azusa Street Revival 1906-1909 around that time, like all revivals ( which was really apostasy ) it falls away.  But it is making headway in droves in these latter days now that it is happening more so behind the media scenes.

My brother's church had a healing service where by that guest speaker was promoting healing by experiencing the tenderness of Jesus as also having an encounter with Jesus; not the Biblical Jesus, but how Jesus will even come to sinners to bring about healing.  And then that pastor of that church gave the call to saved believers to those that hunger for more of God and the said let the "Spirit" fill you.

But these two scriptures refutes that calling as those who are saved would never hunger nor thirst afterwards for a filling.

John 6:35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

Not a leaky vessel that needs a filling of the Spirit after salvation.

Matthew 9:17 Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved.

Thus they are ignoring Paul's warning;

2 Corinthians 11:1Would to God ye could bear with me a little in my folly: and indeed bear with me. 2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. 3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.

2 Corinthians 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?

Matthew 12:38 Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. 39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: 40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

Quote

I'll see if I can get you an updated graph.

I found one posted earlier and so yet to clear by moderation but I do wonder if there is one for 2023.

[ChristB4us]

12 hours ago, BeyondET said:

Countries have long done that chemical warfare was a popular population killer in the past and still is but biological warfare is growing more by the day and who knows a country releases something that only they are vaccinated. Warlords dream of such weapons. Covid came from a place that dreams of such things.

Such a place as Wuhan as SARS & Covid 19 came from there;  is enough for the U.N. to order the closing of such a facility or else.  And yet they are not doing that either.

Probably because they have all got that mindset like Thanos in the MCU movies of Avengers that they are doing a world a favor by reducing the WORLD'S POPULATION.

[George]

43 minutes ago, ChristB4us said:

John 6:35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

Not a leaky vessel that needs a filling of the Spirit after salvation.

Probably not a place for this ... but you are ignoring simple timelines of Scripture.  Read Acts 2 then Acts 4.

Act 2:2  Suddenly a sound like a mighty rushing wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. 

Act 2:3  They saw tongues like flames of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. 

Act 2:4  And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them. 

And then just a few chapters later ...

Act 4:23  On their release, Peter and John returned to their own people and reported everything that the chief priests and elders had said to them. 

Act 4:31  After they had prayed, their meeting place was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly. 

Would you do me a favor and read one of the Baptist preachers on the Power of God whose fruit remains today?  DL Moody's book on "Secret Power" or R.A. Torrey's book, "The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit" or John R. Rice's Book, "The Power of Pentecost".  

[ChristB4us]

20 minutes ago, George said:

Probably not a place for this ... but you are ignoring simple timelines of Scripture.  Read Acts 2 then Acts 4.

Act 2:2  Suddenly a sound like a mighty rushing wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. 

Act 2:3  They saw tongues like flames of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. 

Act 2:4  And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them. 

And then just a few chapters later ...

Act 4:23  On their release, Peter and John returned to their own people and reported everything that the chief priests and elders had said to them. 

Act 4:31  After they had prayed, their meeting place was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly. 

Would you do me a favor and read one of the Baptist preachers on the Power of God whose fruit remains today?  DL Moody's book on "Secret Power" or R.A. Torrey's book, "The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit" or John R. Rice's Book, "The Power of Pentecost".  

Well, I am sure you are doing this in respect to His words below;

2 Timothy 4:1 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.

As it is, the 2nd event does not involve Peter & John even though they were there because the prayer given was by those potential new 5,000 converts that wanted to boldly preach like Peter & John. 

They were not originally saved believers when you read what had happened after that for becoming a new community of believers when they sold everything and then shared or distribute evenly among this new community of believers.

Peter & John got arrested after preaching the gospel to potential believers and so when they were released.

Acts 4:1 And as they spake unto the people, the priests, and the captain of the temple, and the Sadducees, came upon them, 2 Being grieved that they taught the people, and preached through Jesus the resurrection from the dead. 3 And they laid hands on them, and put them in hold unto the next day: for it was now eventide. 4 Howbeit many of them which heard the word believed; and the number of the men was about five thousand.

So for some reason, they were not born again of the Spirit yet and so it was like salvation interrupted or something like that.  When Peter & John were released, into their company, those 5,000 potential new believers, they were impressed by them that they prayed that they too would preach like them and they got saved then.

One has to wonder if they were already saved believers, then why sell everything they have and share among each other as a new community of believers unless that was when they were all born again believers in Jesus Christ.