Jump to content
IGNORED

The divorce and remarriage question


Remarriage evil when:  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. Can Christians remarry and be blameless?

    • OK if one partner committed fornication
      16
    • OK if the an unbelieving partner leaves
      12
    • Ok if there are violence/abuse involved
      7
    • OK only to stay single after divorce
      0
    • OK to divorce/remarry for "any cause"
      1
    • Ok only to stick it out since we have an almighty God
      1
    • Only ok in case of a death to a spouse
      9


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  324
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/29/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  03/16/1964

Posted
I'm not sure my stance is accurately represented in the list of options. On a purely biblical level, the only reason for remarriage would be for a non-believing spouse to leave (and that assumes that you were a non-believer when you first got married and then converted). Jesus comments in Matthew 5 about adultery are quite often misunderstood by many Christians (and non-Christians, for that matter). They read "everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery." (Matthew 5:32) and think that it's ok to divorce your wife if they commit adultery (but it's not ok to divorce if your spouse is abusive, of course).

This particular verse, I think, points to the fact that if a woman (or man) is maritally unfaithful, then they have then committed adultery. But if you divorce someone you are also making them commit adultery. So the only way that you can avoid causing someone to be an adulterer if you divorce them is if they already are an adulterer, in which case nothing's changed. Too many people use this verse the wrong way.

Onto the question of whether a Christian can remarry if divorced, the most correct answer is, "no". It is adultery to be married to one person and then to marry a completely separate person. If a Christian was considering remarriage and asked my opinion, I would counsel against it. However, once they are remarried (if they remarry), then they should not then divorce again since that would be yet another sin. And they most definitely should not split up and get back together with their original partners (that is most definitely a biblical no-no). It's all quite muddled and difficult - sin always is.

The question as to whether a divorced/remarried person can be considered "Christian" is yet another issue. For this, I think only God can know for certain, and it depends on whether the person knew that what they were doing was wrong, and/or whether they had truly repented of that. I cannot point fingers and say a person is saved or not - it is not my place to Judge. Something for God to work out between them and him. It all comes down to what's in the heart.

This is what I think the Bible says about the matter. hope it helps :cool:

~ PA

Dear Brother PA,

I think the scripture Matt 5:32 is quoted wrongly. This is from the American Standard version:

Mat 5:32 but I say unto you, that every one that putteth away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, maketh her an adulteress: and whosoever shall marry her when she is put away committeth adultery.

King James version:

Mat 5:32 But1161 I1473 say3004 unto you,5213 That3754 whosoever3739, 302 shall put away630 his848 wife,1135 saving for3924 the cause3056 of fornication,4202 causeth4160 her846 to commit adultery:3429 and2532 whosoever3739, 1437 shall marry1060 her that is divorced630 committeth adultery.3429

Both versions say that excepy for the reason of fornication and not adultery; ie the bride was not a virgin entering into the marriage, all other grounds for divorce is not valid. The reason is rthat the marriage contract is not valid, which is the ground that Joseph could have divorced Mary legally because she is found to be with child.

G4202

πορνεία

porneia

Thayer Definition:

1) illicit sexual intercourse

1a) adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc.

1b) sexual intercourse with close relatives; Lev. 18

1c) sexual intercourse with a divorced man or woman; Mar_10:11,Mar_10:12

1Co 7:11 (but should she depart, let her remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband); and that the husband leave not his wife.

1Co 7:12 But to the rest say I, not the Lord: If any brother hath an unbelieving wife, and she is content to dwell with him, let him not leave her.

1Co 7:13 And the woman that hath an unbelieving husband, and he is content to dwell with her, let her not leave her husband.

1Co 7:14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified in the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified in the brother: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

1Co 7:15 Yet if the unbelieving departeth, let him depart: the brother or the sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us in peace

Based on 1Cor 7:15 if the unbeliever partner abandons the believer, then a divorce is allowed.

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,060
  • Content Per Day:  0.17
  • Reputation:   18
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/02/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/23/1970

Posted
I'm not sure my stance is accurately represented in the list of options. On a purely biblical level, the only reason for remarriage would be for a non-believing spouse to leave (and that assumes that you were a non-believer when you first got married and then converted). Jesus comments in Matthew 5 about adultery are quite often misunderstood by many Christians (and non-Christians, for that matter). They read "everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery." (Matthew 5:32) and think that it's ok to divorce your wife if they commit adultery (but it's not ok to divorce if your spouse is abusive, of course).

This particular verse, I think, points to the fact that if a woman (or man) is maritally unfaithful, then they have then committed adultery. But if you divorce someone you are also making them commit adultery. So the only way that you can avoid causing someone to be an adulterer if you divorce them is if they already are an adulterer, in which case nothing's changed. Too many people use this verse the wrong way.

Onto the question of whether a Christian can remarry if divorced, the most correct answer is, "no". It is adultery to be married to one person and then to marry a completely separate person. If a Christian was considering remarriage and asked my opinion, I would counsel against it. However, once they are remarried (if they remarry), then they should not then divorce again since that would be yet another sin. And they most definitely should not split up and get back together with their original partners (that is most definitely a biblical no-no). It's all quite muddled and difficult - sin always is.

The question as to whether a divorced/remarried person can be considered "Christian" is yet another issue. For this, I think only God can know for certain, and it depends on whether the person knew that what they were doing was wrong, and/or whether they had truly repented of that. I cannot point fingers and say a person is saved or not - it is not my place to Judge. Something for God to work out between them and him. It all comes down to what's in the heart.

This is what I think the Bible says about the matter. hope it helps :emot-puke-old:

~ PA

Dear Brother PA,

I think the scripture Matt 5:32 is quoted wrongly. This is from the American Standard version:

Mat 5:32 but I say unto you, that every one that putteth away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, maketh her an adulteress: and whosoever shall marry her when she is put away committeth adultery.

King James version:

Mat 5:32 But1161 I1473 say3004 unto you,5213 That3754 whosoever3739, 302 shall put away630 his848 wife,1135 saving for3924 the cause3056 of fornication,4202 causeth4160 her846 to commit adultery:3429 and2532 whosoever3739, 1437 shall marry1060 her that is divorced630 committeth adultery.3429

Both versions say that excepy for the reason of fornication and not adultery; ie the bride was not a virgin entering into the marriage, all other grounds for divorce is not valid. The reason is rthat the marriage contract is not valid, which is the ground that Joseph could have divorced Mary legally because she is found to be with child.

G4202

πορνεία

porneia

Thayer Definition:

1) illicit sexual intercourse

1a) adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc.

1b) sexual intercourse with close relatives; Lev. 18

1c) sexual intercourse with a divorced man or woman; Mar_10:11,Mar_10:12

1Co 7:11 (but should she depart, let her remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband); and that the husband leave not his wife.

1Co 7:12 But to the rest say I, not the Lord: If any brother hath an unbelieving wife, and she is content to dwell with him, let him not leave her.

1Co 7:13 And the woman that hath an unbelieving husband, and he is content to dwell with her, let her not leave her husband.

1Co 7:14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified in the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified in the brother: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

1Co 7:15 Yet if the unbelieving departeth, let him depart: the brother or the sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us in peace

Based on 1Cor 7:15 if the unbeliever partner abandons the believer, then a divorce is allowed.

You have quoted the Matthew 5 passage well. It does say "put away" (kick out, abandon, seperate) and not "divorce" as so many other versions say. Divorce is an end. It is final and complete; that means there is nothing holding one spouse to another. It is not adultry to get married if there is nothing beholding one to a former spouse. Yet, if one got married while merely "put away" (or what it is called now- "seperated") then it is obviously adultry.

  • 3 months later...

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  121
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  1,931
  • Content Per Day:  0.32
  • Reputation:   126
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/22/2009
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/13/1955

Posted

What is unlawful intercourse within a marriage?

Oh boy...how can I tell you this answer without getting myself banned or chastened or putting images into your mind which might cause you to stumble.

"Unlawful" intercourse would be a TYPE of sexual conduct committed between two partners which God would consider unclean. I don't think I need to list it, that would be stepping over a boundary I don't want to cross. I would say though, that even if both partners agreed to do such an act or acts, they'd still be sinning.

This is between married partners mind you. I think as adults that you can figure out what I mean without a list?

On to other things. Like defrauding. Boy, there is a sin that is not touched on much if at all. Defrauding is the act of failing to give one's partner their due in marriage. When people are married, they have an obligation to meet one another's desire for intimacy. Continual failure to do so for no good reason (illness, monthly time, advanced pregnancy, mutual agreed prayer time, or doctor's orders) is defrauding.

There is an old adage that says that if a partner is not getting what they need at home, they will seek it elsewhere. This may be a saying of men, but it is certainly true. How many marriages have been wrecked because one partner or the other failed to meet the physical desire of the other, and in utter frustration, that partner committed sin over it? "Not tonight honey, I have a headache" is neither funny NOR is it right when it becomes a continual occurrence. It's worse than being cheated on. The defrauded partner gets relegated to the status of dog or cat. Expected to be there for you, but get none of their desires taken care of. This sin is committed by women far more than men, but men do it too. It's a marriage wrecker. No self-respecting man will allow himself to be cuckolded for very long. By defrauding your partner, you cause them to sin. You'd best think long and hard about that and rectify the situation.

Now, Ezekiel, I have a question for you, or more precisely, a hypothetical.

"Sheik Abdul" we'll call him, is a Muslim who comes to America and then becomes a Christian. He has fourteen wives, fifty or so children, and is a good father and a faithful man. Which of his wives should he divorce now that he's a Christian?

Finally: what right does the state have to interfere in marriage between men and women and demand that we be licensed like dogs?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,258
  • Content Per Day:  0.72
  • Reputation:   42
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/16/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/22/1960

Posted

Hi Bold Believer,

Yes witholding sex is not scriptural in a marriage. I don't think "defrauding" is mentioned however in scripture. My question to you is what would or more importantly should, a "self respecting" Christian man do if his wife utterly refuses to be intimate?

What are his options as a Christian?

  • 2 weeks later...

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,258
  • Content Per Day:  0.72
  • Reputation:   42
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/16/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/22/1960

Posted

Waiting for an answer to this.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  44
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,773
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   51
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/27/1957

Posted

Let me put this out there for food for thought.

I got divorced. I do not regret getting divorced. I regret getting married.

It was not a mistake getting divorced. It was my mistake getting married. Divorce was the only way to correct a mistake I made. (other than murder, which would have been more exceptable to some)

I did not answer your poll because the word OK tends to add a meaning or conotation that I do not like.

Making a mistake, regardless of what the mistake is, does not condemn anyone to any particular walk in life or situation.

We seem much more willling to an ex drug adict, recovering alcoholic, murderer, sex offender become a pastor of a church than an ex-married person. That's just wrong.

A person who has gone through a divorce doesn't need his fellow brothers and sisters to start dictating moral absolutes instead of grace.

Getting married killed most of my minstry work and put an end to the minister I was. Getting divorced branded me as being of no use to men and their churches. Fortunately, JESUS has never removed my anointing to preach the gospel or my calling to teach and exhort HIS people. HE always gives me work to do.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  37
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  913
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   19
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  03/29/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/02/1969

Posted
Let me put this out there for food for thought.

I got divorced. I do not regret getting divorced. I regret getting married.

It was not a mistake getting divorced. It was my mistake getting married. Divorce was the only way to correct a mistake I made. (other than murder, which would have been more exceptable to some)

I did not answer your poll because the word OK tends to add a meaning or conotation that I do not like.

Making a mistake, regardless of what the mistake is, does not condemn anyone to any particular walk in life or situation.

We seem much more willling to an ex drug adict, recovering alcoholic, murderer, sex offender become a pastor of a church than an ex-married person. That's just wrong.

A person who has gone through a divorce doesn't need his fellow brothers and sisters to start dictating moral absolutes instead of grace.

Getting married killed most of my minstry work and put an end to the minister I was. Getting divorced branded me as being of no use to men and their churches. Fortunately, JESUS has never removed my anointing to preach the gospel or my calling to teach and exhort HIS people. HE always gives me work to do.

Amen kross :)

I've been reading this thread, but had not posted, but your post hit the nail on the head!

I've known pastor who have been divorced and the chuches make a scandal of it. God can and still does use these men of the cloth.

Only God can judge these hearts, and in all our sinfullness HE still calls us and uses us, and annoints.

You keep doing what God has called you to do!


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Not enough choices.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  44
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,773
  • Content Per Day:  0.29
  • Reputation:   51
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/27/1957

Posted
Let me put this out there for food for thought.

I got divorced. I do not regret getting divorced. I regret getting married.

It was not a mistake getting divorced. It was my mistake getting married. Divorce was the only way to correct a mistake I made. (other than murder, which would have been more exceptable to some)

I did not answer your poll because the word OK tends to add a meaning or conotation that I do not like.

Making a mistake, regardless of what the mistake is, does not condemn anyone to any particular walk in life or situation.

We seem much more willling to an ex drug adict, recovering alcoholic, murderer, sex offender become a pastor of a church than an ex-married person. That's just wrong.

A person who has gone through a divorce doesn't need his fellow brothers and sisters to start dictating moral absolutes instead of grace.

Getting married killed most of my minstry work and put an end to the minister I was. Getting divorced branded me as being of no use to men and their churches. Fortunately, JESUS has never removed my anointing to preach the gospel or my calling to teach and exhort HIS people. HE always gives me work to do.

Amen kross :)

I've been reading this thread, but had not posted, but your post hit the nail on the head!

I've known pastor who have been divorced and the chuches make a scandal of it. God can and still does use these men of the cloth.

Only God can judge these hearts, and in all our sinfullness HE still calls us and uses us, and annoints.

You keep doing what God has called you to do!

If I would have murdered my wife, that would have been forgiveable.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  51
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  499
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   3
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/29/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/08/1964

Posted

Instead of focusing on other people's actions and trying to judge them, focus on Jesus and live by the Spirit. Who are we to label others as guilty and pass judgement? Every thing we do should be done to glorify Him.

1 Corinthians 10:31 - So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.

I don't think spending our time judging others is glorifying God.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...