Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  426
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  3,633
  • Content Per Day:  0.55
  • Reputation:   222
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  03/23/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/26/1978

Posted

Gotcha sorry I am overtired and I understood your point! I did not mean to take away from it.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  5.76
  • Reputation:   9,978
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

First of all the president said that the Palistinians would have to accept Israel as a Jewish state. Then when he said they would go back to the 1967 borders he also added that there would have to be equal territory swaps so as to ensure the defensability of both Israel and Palistine. He also said that he (and the US) would never stop being friends and helping Israel.

he also knows that the way the arabs are breeding that at some point in the near future there will not be any way to solve this peacefully....... and can not anyway unless the arabs accept Israel as a nation.

Good post, O.O. You are one of the very few that get the whole thing.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  105
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  1,741
  • Content Per Day:  0.27
  • Reputation:   28
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/23/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/30/1959

Posted

I dont get it. Normally I dont rail on these post about politics and I work hard to stay out of that topic in my 'Examiner articles' but I dont get it. Someone please explain it to me. Barak Obama in his speech, just the other day, now believes that Israel should return to it's pre- 1967 borders, reducing the country to just about 9 miles wide. What would they get in return for this dramatic consession? A country both the north and West end of its borders governed by Hamas, the PLA's version of Al Quida. This at a time, when these 'thugs' are launching rockets into Israel and killing children riding on a school bus. Please help me understand. Ariel Sharon stood at West Bank settlements with a bullet proof jacket, after having agree to dismantle jewish settlements. His body guards were afraid he would be shot by an angry Jewish settler! He asked for only peace in return. The people of the PLA's response? They elected Hamas to run the country. Israel agreed to pull out of Lebanon years early, when they had their foot on the Lebanese throat. Their requirement? That the UN would ensure that Hezbolah did not take up residence in the land they left. Some 15 years later, had to return to root Hezbolah out of the very place they vacated.

How many times do you get slapped in the face, lied to. How many times do your woman and children come home in body bags before it is recognized that you have a right to defend your country! How many more hollocusts must happen before as a world we understand that these people have a basic right to exist! This administration's middle east policy is lunacy! Complete lunacy! Please help me to understand what this President is thinking?! Had to get that off my chest.

from what i understand, working from the 1967 borders has been the starting point for all peace talks that have ever taken place. this doesn't mean the u.s. wants those borders, it's just a point that all can refer to so that all members of the talks can be on the same page.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  955
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  11,318
  • Content Per Day:  1.78
  • Reputation:   448
  • Days Won:  33
  • Joined:  12/16/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

First of all the president said that the Palistinians would have to accept Israel as a Jewish state. Then when he said they would go back to the 1967 borders he also added that there would have to be equal territory swaps so as to ensure the defensability of both Israel and Palistine. He also said that he (and the US) would never stop being friends and helping Israel.

he also knows that the way the arabs are breeding that at some point in the near future there will not be any way to solve this peacefully....... and can not anyway unless the arabs accept Israel as a nation.

Good post, O.O. You are one of the very few that get the whole thing.

Define "friends with Israel". Yeah it's easy for Obama to say that, but alliances are determined not by words but by actions. It is not the act of a "friend" to demand a return to indefensible borders which welcome the dessimation of Israel by it's enemies. Just how exactly does that work? "I'm your friend, so I'm going to support something that will be [from a military, strategic point of view] an act of sabotage"??? Whaaa???


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  32
  • Topic Count:  669
  • Topics Per Day:  0.09
  • Content Count:  59,747
  • Content Per Day:  7.65
  • Reputation:   31,135
  • Days Won:  322
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

First of all the president said that the Palistinians would have to accept Israel as a Jewish state. Then when he said they would go back to the 1967 borders he also added that there would have to be equal territory swaps so as to ensure the defensability of both Israel and Palistine. He also said that he (and the US) would never stop being friends and helping Israel.

he also knows that the way the arabs are breeding that at some point in the near future there will not be any way to solve this peacefully....... and can not anyway unless the arabs accept Israel as a nation.

Good post, O.O. You are one of the very few that get the whole thing.

Define "friends with Israel". Yeah it's easy for Obama to say that, but alliances are determined not by words but by actions. It is not the act of a "friend" to demand a return to indefensible borders which welcome the dessimation of Israel by it's enemies. Just how exactly does that work? "I'm your friend, so I'm going to support something that will be [from a military, strategic point of view] an act of sabotage"??? Whaaa???

Candice, Obama did not recomend, demand or even suggest that they return to their 67 borders without swapping land that would make both countries defendable...... You need to listen to his entire speech before you say those kinds of things. He made it very very clear that the USA would never turn it's back on Israel.

he went on to tell people that because of the birth rate of the arabs in the area that unless some way is found to get a two state peace between them soon, it will be impossible to do just from the demographics that are developing...... which Israel really needs to pay attention to.. He also said that unless the Palistinians agree that Israel has a right to exist in peace, there can be no peace...... so I really don't understand what you guys and gals are getting so upset about.....


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  955
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  11,318
  • Content Per Day:  1.78
  • Reputation:   448
  • Days Won:  33
  • Joined:  12/16/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Sam, it doesn't make it any more palatable that there was a swap of land proposed rather than just a mere giving away of land.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.73
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.75
  • Reputation:   2,255
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

Candice, Obama did not recomend, demand or even suggest that they return to their 67 borders without swapping land that would make both countries defendable...... You need to listen to his entire speech before you say those kinds of things. He made it very very clear that the USA would never turn it's back on Israel.

he went on to tell people that because of the birth rate of the arabs in the area that unless some way is found to get a two state peace between them soon, it will be impossible to do just from the demographics that are developing...... which Israel really needs to pay attention to.. He also said that unless the Palistinians agree that Israel has a right to exist in peace, there can be no peace...... so I really don't understand what you guys and gals are getting so upset about.....

What do you make of the observation Palin made,

Posted

I dont get it. Normally I dont rail on these post about politics and I work hard to stay out of that topic in my 'Examiner articles' but I dont get it. Someone please explain it to me. Barak Obama in his speech, just the other day, now believes that Israel should return to it's pre- 1967 borders, reducing the country to just about 9 miles wide. What would they get in return for this dramatic consession? A country both the north and West end of its borders governed by Hamas, the PLA's version of Al Quida. This at a time, when these 'thugs' are launching rockets into Israel and killing children riding on a school bus. Please help me understand. Ariel Sharon stood at West Bank settlements with a bullet proof jacket, after having agree to dismantle jewish settlements. His body guards were afraid he would be shot by an angry Jewish settler! He asked for only peace in return. The people of the PLA's response? They elected Hamas to run the country. Israel agreed to pull out of Lebanon years early, when they had their foot on the Lebanese throat. Their requirement? That the UN would ensure that Hezbolah did not take up residence in the land they left. Some 15 years later, had to return to root Hezbolah out of the very place they vacated.

How many times do you get slapped in the face, lied to. How many times do your woman and children come home in body bags before it is recognized that you have a right to defend your country! How many more hollocusts must happen before as a world we understand that these people have a basic right to exist! This administration's middle east policy is lunacy! Complete lunacy! Please help me to understand what this President is thinking?! Had to get that off my chest.

from what i understand, working from the 1967 borders has been the starting point for all peace talks that have ever taken place. this doesn't mean the u.s. wants those borders, it's just a point that all can refer to so that all members of the talks can be on the same page.

I'm pretty sure that ObaMoses (that's my new portmanteau for him in reference to Israel) meant those borders.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.73
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.75
  • Reputation:   2,255
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

What do you make of the observation Palin made,

I make that she is just trying to "strengthen" her run for the presidency, in which, if she wins will still do the exact same nonsense, just in right wing way. The right will love her and big her up with " look at Sarah" and " you go girl" while the left will despise her. Basically the circle of political-life will continue.

Ruck!

I wanted to hear what people though of her message, about the


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  5.76
  • Reputation:   9,978
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I make that she is just trying to "strengthen" her run for the presidency, in which, if she wins will still do the exact same nonsense, just in right wing way. The right will love her and big her up with " look at Sarah" and " you go girl" while the left will despise her. Basically the circle of political-life will continue.

I agree with your premise, although I don't believe she will run, because the American President (regardless of who he/she may be) is stuck with this Middle East peace process and there is no way out of the morass except to pretend to back the idiocy of 'land for peace'. No President has meant it and Ms. Palin would follow the same tired route if she was elected.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...