Which Bible Version can you recommend (KJV, NIV, NKJV, etc)

[manuelf324]

Your obviously a heretik not interested in the truth just arguing. God bless anyway 

THIS IS SO TRUE

 Cor  12:15 And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.

THE LOST DONT APPERICIATE YOUR CHARITY BUT GOD DOES

 

[hmbld]

2 minutes ago, manuelf324 said:

Your obviously a heretik not interested in the truth just arguing. God bless anyway 

THIS IS SO TRUE

 Cor  12:15 And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.

THE LOST DONT APPERICIATE YOUR CHARITY BUT GOD DOES

 

I am sorry, I thought we were conversing.  Was I supposed to let you teach me?  Are you really going to come here and call people names?  

[hmbld]

You know, there are times we need to stand on God's Word even if we are hated.  Yes, that is true.  But one should be known for his love, and not concerned if he is hated, for if you are concerned if you are hated, well then it would be hard to be concerned for others and love them enough to share the hope and the truth you have, which is God seeks to have a relationship with all of us, we do not seek Him, I am covered by Jesus's blood, nothing I do can add anything, which includes thinking I have to be smart enough to pick the one and only version of a translation that God approves of.  When God spoke to me, and led me to read the bible for the first time, cover to cover in less than 2 months, I was but a babe.  If someone had put this Kjv only concern in my head at that time, it would have severely discouraged me as I found it very hard to read.  My concern is for anyone reading this topic, who may be discouraged from reading perfectly good versions of God's Word that are easy for them to understand.  Please have faith in God, that the Holy Spirit can and will teach anyone who chooses to read a modern version of text.  

[saved34]

2 hours ago, manuelf324 said:

Your obviously a heretik not interested in the truth just arguing. God bless anyway 

THIS IS SO TRUE

 Cor  12:15 And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.

THE LOST DONT APPERICIATE YOUR CHARITY BUT GOD DOES

 

A heretick? Really? 

[hmbld]

13 minutes ago, Butero said:

I can prove that legalism is not a word found in scripture.  I can prove that Jesus never rebuked the Pharisees for being legalists, but his issue with them was that they were hypocrites, teaching one thing but living another.  I can prove that Jesus and the other writers of the New Testament would be legalists based on your standards and the standards of people like you.  It is not hard either. 

God is going to hold you accountable for teaching false doctrine.  This is false doctrine I can prove to be false.  He will also hold you accountable for defending the destruction of his Holy Word.  I can prove that the modern translations say different things, leave out or include different verses from each other, and those who defend them claim that none are perfect.  I feel very confident that come the judgment day, in this matter, I will be cleared and you will be found guilty.  Good day. 

Clinging to legalism to justify oneself while accusing the destruction of "his Holy Word".  

John 19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

[ccfromsc]

5 hours ago, Deborah_ said:

"The fool says in his heart, 'There is no God.'" (Psalm 14:1; Psalm 53:1)

All Bibles say this. I do not see how your observation contributes anything useful to this discussion, but perhaps you can explain.

Thank you! You posted it..... Never the less the KJV states word for word there is no God.....right Butero & Manuel?

[saved34]

52 minutes ago, Butero said:

Would you like to debate this topic in the Soap Box?  The offer is open to you.  I can prove that legalism isn't mentioned in scripture.  I can prove that Jesus wasn't rebuking the Pharisees for being legalists.  I can prove that most of the New Testament writers would be called legalists by many.  I can show examples from WB where people that cry legalism are guilty of violating their own standards.  I wrote down actual examples of them saying things that would qualify as legalism by their definition to use if they come back and start making that accusation at me in the future. 

Before I will offer to debate anyone in the Soap Box, I have to be sure I can either win outright or at worse finish in a draw.  I know my Bible and can't be easily taken in by false accusations like everything is legalism.  If you want to debate this topic, I would love to do so, because knowing that debate will be around for people to read for a long time, I wouldn't challenge anyone over something I don't know well enough to win. 

Yet, you don't even know well enough that Christ pre crucified would never speak against the law. Only until he hung on the tree could it be said we are not under Law, but grace.

"Galatians 4:4-5 NIV
But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, [5] to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship."

"Galatians 3:13 NIV
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole.”

If we only read all scripture in light of Christ and his finished work. He was born a human Jew, under the law. There was no way he would blantantly teach against the law. There could be no new or better way apart from him shedding his blood even though he was innocent in every respect to his own Holy law.

You running around talking about legalism is good shows a definite lack of understanding of what you are saying.

[saved34]

4 minutes ago, Butero said:

I am the one that pointed out that Jesus was teaching while he was under the law.  Go back just a few posts.  Yet people claim Jesus went about attacking the Pharisees for being legalists and that Jesus broke the law. 

I said that I can show examples where other Bible authors including Peter, James and John could be called legalists based on the false doctrine of the modern church, and after the cross, not before it. 

No you can't. The Apostles and their letters teach no such thing. They all harmonize to perfection on the grace of God.

[ccfromsc]

4 hours ago, manuelf324 said:

Again my authority is the Bible if you really serious in finding the truth like i was. Please send me your email if not fine. 

Ok which bible? Which VERSION of the KJV?The one in 1611 or one of the revisions in 1613, 1629, 1638, 1644, 1664, 1701, 1744, 1762, 1769, or the last one in 1850? Please specify which one. 

 

[saved34]

2 minutes ago, Butero said:

Do you wish to debate this topic in the Soap Box?

Debate what? The fundamental truth that we are no longer under law? If you haven't grasped that truth by now what would I debate? It would be pointless. Not interested.

At least get a fundamental understanding enough to not call yourself a legalist.