Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Throughout history we've seen women in battle who contributed greatly to their countries. I think it is a misogynist attitude that women should not be in war/military.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  2,155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  51,420
  • Content Per Day:  11.41
  • Reputation:   31,560
  • Days Won:  240
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

How should men treat women?

Posted

With respect, love, and dignity....Christ said love one another as I loved you.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  414
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  1,273
  • Content Per Day:  0.33
  • Reputation:   519
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/22/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Reason I started  to was because of this-I started a post in another forum about double standards in writing.  How in tv we see one set  of people doing certain things and it'll get different reactions than when another set another set do it. 

my examples were-

A comic character famously hit his wife decades ago. While abuse is never  ok. The fact was ,he was mentally unstable at the time, recovered,  was very sorry,never did it again  and even the wife he hit forgave him and they reconciled. yetvrhr character is branded as a wife nearer.

In contrast many shows feature  women hitting or beating men as comedic.

Secondly,

I said a blast domineering wife who ruled over her husband is  seen in comedies  but a man who dominated hiscwode is the lifetime  movie of the week. 

Was accused of misogyny.  I'm puzzled. I'm just pointing out the way shows are written


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  1,294
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  31,762
  • Content Per Day:  4.92
  • Reputation:   9,769
  • Days Won:  115
  • Joined:  09/14/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
44 minutes ago, Allroses48 said:

Throughout history we've seen women in battle who contributed greatly to their countries. I think it is a misogynist attitude that women should not be in war/military.

I am sure nobody is saying women cannot server in war or the military.  The question I have heard is what position would they serve best in.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  1,294
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  31,762
  • Content Per Day:  4.92
  • Reputation:   9,769
  • Days Won:  115
  • Joined:  09/14/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
10 minutes ago, creativemechanic said:

Reason I started  to was because of this-I started a post in another forum about double standards in writing.  How in tv we see one set  of people doing certain things and it'll get different reactions than when another set another set do it. 

my examples were-

A comic character famously hit his wife decades ago. While abuse is never  ok. The fact was ,he was mentally unstable at the time, recovered,  was very sorry,never did it again  and even the wife he hit forgave him and they reconciled. yetvrhr character is branded as a wife nearer.

In contrast many shows feature  women hitting or beating men as comedic.

Secondly,

I said a blast domineering wife who ruled over her husband is  seen in comedies  but a man who dominated hiscwode is the lifetime  movie of the week. 

Was accused of misogyny.  I'm puzzled. I'm just pointing out the way shows are written

Would you care to retype this so we can follow???

Posted
6 minutes ago, OneLight said:

I am sure nobody is saying women cannot server in war or the military.  The question I have heard is what position would they serve best in.

Currently there are Kurdish units of women who are snipers and are taking out ISIS members. I think anyone can be trained to be a good soldier depending on ability. You just have to have the physical and mental training and ability  for it.


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  349
  • Content Per Day:  0.12
  • Reputation:   300
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  05/10/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
14 minutes ago, creativemechanic said:

Reason I started  to was because of this-I started a post in another forum about double standards in writing.  How in tv we see one set  of people doing certain things and it'll get different reactions than when another set another set do it. 

my examples were-

A comic character famously hit his wife decades ago. While abuse is never  ok. The fact was ,he was mentally unstable at the time, recovered,  was very sorry,never did it again  and even the wife he hit forgave him and they reconciled. yetvrhr character is branded as a wife nearer.

In contrast many shows feature  women hitting or beating men as comedic.

Secondly,

I said a blast domineering wife who ruled over her husband is  seen in comedies  but a man who dominated hiscwode is the lifetime  movie of the week. 

Was accused of misogyny.  I'm puzzled. I'm just pointing out the way shows are written

I think writers appeal to a demographic of viewership in such things. I use to work for a company that gathered information of a type that pertained to marketing future business in any given area. There was always a certain demographic a client was looking to appeal to. And as a consequence of that we were given certain call sheets that matched that model to contact on the clients behalf. 

The Honeymooners show is crass by today's standards. Yet, in its prime it was considered hilarious and made the actors famous. Just like the three stooges. To this day I don't know why that show was on so long but it was. And all that was was buffoons being violent. And people laughed. And the stooges became a household name. 

Not everyone watched those shows. But the one's that did approved the visuals that were being displayed. The relationship between characters being displayed. It's marketing. And it all arrives from an understanding of where a certain segment of society, demographic, is at when the scripts for those shows are drafted. They're not drafted for everyone to enjoy. They're drafted for a certain intellect to find entertaining. 

That's how it is in all television programming. 

Feed the viewers needs. 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  59
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  4,403
  • Content Per Day:  0.91
  • Reputation:   2,155
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  02/10/2012
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/26/1971

Posted

I grew up a misogynist.  It has been hard to change.  I first had to learn what love and hate are.  The most hateful thing I ever did to a woman was worship her and give her God's place in my heart.  

I am steadily learning how to love.  

The bible declares that people get things so mixed up they call evil good and good evil.  Even to the point of crucifying the Son of God.  Why would we not understand that we are capable of misunderstanding the proper role of gender in mankind?  Even with the bible at our fingertips touching on the subject repeatedly many say did "God really say that?".

 


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  260
  • Content Per Day:  0.09
  • Reputation:   188
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/02/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
20 hours ago, OneLight said:

Scripture shows us who can and cannot be leaders in the church.  If you disagree with what is said, you are calling the writers of scripture naive and ignorant and arrogant.  You realize this, don't you?

No, I'm calling the people who think to interpolate the scriptures to say women can't be called to service by God, when scriptures show that is not the case, naive, ignorant, and arrogant. And prideful thinking their ego's know more than does God. As if God would deliver the message that we're all one in Christ and then say, but because we're women he'd never see us fit to preach his word. Speaking for God in a way that denotes prejudice is far worse than naive. 

You realize this, don't you?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...