Deleted by me.

[HAZARD]

9 hours ago, Running Gator said:

The building in London did not have two 110 story building collapse next to it, which would weaken it allowing the fire, which was way, way more than a few "isolated fires" which your link falsely claims. 

I will also add I think it is reprehensible to use a tragedy like this fire in which more than a dozen people died to push some conspiracy driven agenda. 

I deleted it seeing your offended. I had no intention of using this tragedy to push some conspiracy driven agenda. I also had no idea there were people like you who would make such an accusation. Its world news, their asking this question here in Aus. on talk back radio and its also in some papers.

Despite being offended you still managed to respond. When ever I'm offended by a post, I ignore it.

[other one]

44 minutes ago, Cobalt1959 said:

The biggest conspiracy theory I've heard are the one's that people invent in their own heads.

I guess that leaves me out.

[HAZARD]

4 hours ago, Rick_Parker said:

This is not news any more. You have taken it to conspiracy theory and therefore needs to be moved to controversial topics.

Sorry, it is still making news,

June 16, 20176:46am

LONDON Fire Commissioner Dany Cotton has revealed teams of specialist dogs will be sent in to smouldering wreckage to search for victims of the Grenfell Tower blaze amid fears about its structural integrity.

The fire boss said firefighters will use an “internal shoring” process to build structures inside the 24-storey block to ensure it does not collapse. A “detailed fingertip” search is also underway for victims.

‘UNLIKELY’ TO COLLAPSE

In West London the smouldering hulk continues to pour debris down on the surrounding area with increasing concern about the structural integrity of the building.

A collapse zone has been established around the property and UK Prime Minister Theresa May has promised a full public inquiry into what went wrong.

 

Structural engineering professor John Knapton said the building is “unlikely” to cave in given that it was built after a building code change following an earlier disaster.

“While there can be no guarantee than it won’t collapse, its unlikely,” he told The Telegraph.

http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/dogs-used-as-police-begin-fingertip-search-grenfell-tower/news-story/11a793d58b3677b5642fb113dfc5a179

And here;

europe

Pictures reveal devastation inside smouldering London tower

June 16, 20177:21am

THERE are fears the death toll in the London apartment tower fire could be “more than 100”, as the eerie photographs emerge providing the first look inside the building’s smouldering remains.

http://www.news.com.au/world/europe/pictures-reveal-devastation-inside-smouldering-london-tower/news-story/838fa0d430be75d6de1ff05910346296

[HAZARD]

A friend in the states sent me this this morning, we were discussing the London fire and what happened on 9/11.

 

 

 

Edited June 19, 2017 by OneLight
No YouTube Links allowed.

[Anonymous Aristotle]

On 6/15/2017 at 0:10 AM, HAZARD said:

Deleted by me because of this unwarranted comment by Running Gator who wrote;

"I will also add I think it is reprehensible to use a tragedy like this fire in which more than a dozen people died to push some conspiracy driven agenda."

*******************************

This was not my intention.  

 

I respectfully would offer to spare your hurt feelings for this unwarrented comment by saying, when it warranted deletion of the article the comment served its purpose. 

I've only been a member here for a very short time. In that time I have noticed there is an inconsistency in moral umbrage by the cause of your concern. When the offense is merited as necessary to offend Republicans, Trump supporters, Christians, it is posted, defended, without apology. 

It appears the balance for that behavior finds itself targeting Republicans, Trump supporters, and Christians, when inspired to use the moral high ground as cause. When, if that did exist the aforementioned would never make it past the gate with their name attached. 

I would suggest you repost a source to make the time and effort members here took to honestly comment worth their time. Give an inch expect to inspire the expectation in future you'll concede a mile.    I was hoping what I was seeing was anomaly. Figment of my imagination in the pattern of posts by what bolsters my concern. I'm sad to say in looking about that that was naive of me. Take heart. You're a good person.  And God LOVES YOU! 

[Anonymous Aristotle]

On 6/15/2017 at 0:53 PM, Rick_Parker said:

This is not news any more. You have taken it to conspiracy theory and therefore needs to be moved to controversial topics.

No, I don't believe he has. "or something else" , would be the banned cladding for that height of tower that none the less was applied to Grenfell tower. And as such hastened the rapid burn and progression of the flames from the initial igniter source. Experts warned government against cladding material used on Grenfell

 

 

 

David Lammy condemns government failure to support Grenfell Tower victims: 'We're behaving like Victorian England'‘I met people yesterday who had been given £10. They have lost everything,’ says Labour MP

 

[Anonymous Aristotle]

On 6/16/2017 at 10:00 PM, HAZARD said:

A friend in the states sent me this this morning, we were discussing the London fire and what happened on 9/11.

 

At 2:56 in that video I got a chill. As I did in Jersey when I was watching the towers smolder and then heard the explosions in the lower part of the towers that reminded me of when I attended demolitions of casino's and other tower structures prior. 

[OneLight]

No YouTube links.  If the video is important, place it in the video forum and link to the embedded video.