Ezekiel Chapter 39 Is This A Future Or Historical Battle?

[Diaste]

I'm out of this one. 

Appreciate the reply.

 

[truth7t7]

14 minutes ago, Alive said:

Do you believe that Jesus Christ died and rose from the dead?

Jesus Christ was God manifest in the flesh, he led a sinless life, died on the cross of Calvary shedding his precious blood in remission for the worlds sin,

Jesus was buried and he resurrected into a glorified body of flesh and bone, appeared to over 500 at once, he ascended to the be at the right hand of the Father, where he presently awaits his future return in fire and final judgement, dissolving this earth by fire (The End)

Edited February 6, 2022 by truth7t7

[Alive]

Just now, truth7t7 said:

Jesus Christ was God manifest in the flesh, he led a sinless life, died on the cross of Calvary shedding his precious blood in remission for the worlds sin,

Jesus was buried and he resurrected into a glorified body of flesh and bone, appeared to over 500, he ascended to the be at the right hand of the Father, where he presently awaits his future return in fire and final judgement dissolving this earth by fire (The End)

Thank you and amen.

This makes you a partial preterist. Every christian is a partial pret. It is simply a matter of degree and building a scriptural case for the position. This is fine and expected.

We all know that much of the Olivet discourse did actually already happen in 70 AD. I do, so I am a partial pret.

:-)

[missmuffet]

1 minute ago, Alive said:

Thank you and amen.

This makes you a partial preterist. Every christian is a partial pret. It is simply a matter of degree and building a scriptural case for the position. This is fine and expected.

We all know that much of the Olivet discourse did actually already happen in 70 AD. I do, so I am a partial pret.

:-)

I don't support the partial preterist view. 

[truth7t7]

8 minutes ago, Alive said:

Thank you and amen.

This makes you a partial preterist. Every christian is a partial pret. It is simply a matter of degree and building a scriptural case for the position. This is fine and expected.

We all know that much of the Olivet discourse did actually already happen in 70 AD. I do, so I am a partial pret.

:-)

My eschatology is 100% "Futurist" your claim is false, 66-70AD Jerusalem played absolutely no part in fulfillment of Matthew Chapter 24

Matthew Chapter 24 is future, the 3 items below are future unfulfilled

1. Matthew 24:15, Daniel's Abomination

2. Matthew 24:21, The Great Tribilation

3. Matthew 24:29-31, The Lords return in the clouds of heaven

Edited February 6, 2022 by truth7t7

[truth7t7]

3 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

I don't support the partial preterist view. 

Do you believe Jesus Christ will return to earth in the clouds of heaven?

Matthew 24:29-31

[Alive]

2 minutes ago, truth7t7 said:

My eschatology is 100% "Futurist" your claim is false 

Matthew Chapter 24 is future, the 3 items below are future unfulfilled

1. Matthew 24:15, Daniel's Abomination

2. Matthew 24:21, The Great Tribilation

3. Matthew 24:29-31, The Lords return in the clouds of heaven

You just proved otherwise with your own words. One of the most wonderful proofs that Christ was who He claimed is the destruction of the temple that he prophesied. To the folks of that day, "not one stone on another", was a very hard thing to believe was even possible.

The gentiles hearing and believing the word of the Lord was another. The scriptures are full of fullfilled prophecy.

[angels4u]

7 minutes ago, Alive said:

You just proved otherwise with your own words. One of the most wonderful proofs that Christ was who He claimed is the destruction of the temple that he prophesied. To the folks of that day, "not one stone on another", was a very hard thing to believe was even possible.

The gentiles hearing and believing the word of the Lord was another. The scriptures are full of fullfilled prophecy.

Quote

The scriptures are full of fullfilled prophecy.

Don't forget ,there's still lots of prophecy not being fulfillled but geting fulfilled right before our eyes..

[truth7t7]

19 minutes ago, Alive said:

You just proved otherwise with your own words. One of the most wonderful proofs that Christ was who He claimed is the destruction of the temple that he prophesied. To the folks of that day, "not one stone on another", was a very hard thing to believe was even possible.

The gentiles hearing and believing the word of the Lord was another. The scriptures are full of fullfilled prophecy.

As stated 66-70AD Jerusalem played no part in fulfillment of Matthew Chapter 24

As per John's account of the temple visit, Jesus Christ spoke of the "Symbolic" destruction of the temple in Jerusalem, that was seen in his death, burial,and resurrection

When Jesus Christ died, the veil in the temple was torn, God vacated the temple, its was "Gone" not one stone upon another

His disciples remembered after his resurrection what was said concerning the temple in Jerusalem

John 2:19-22KJV

19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.

20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?

21 But he spake of the temple of his body.

22 When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.

 

Edited February 6, 2022 by truth7t7

[Alive]

1 minute ago, angels4u said:

Don't forget ,there's still lots of prophecy not being fulfillled but geting fulfilled right before our eyes..

I am waiting and watching for the Lord's return.

Maranatha!