Poison ☠?

[Ani Tefillah]

2 minutes ago, B-B said:

I haven't watched the video @MonicaWife but you are certainly wise to be cautious re: the Covid jabs. 

We do not know what the long term effects of receiving the jabs will be, and sadly there have been a number of folk harmed by its side effects. 

I work in Pharmacy but I'm not at all for the pushing/promoting of this treatment for the virus.

 

The video testefies about many whom have died because of the vaccine, and I recall that two or three of them were in their twenties and thirties, and in very good shape before they got the vaccine, and they died in their sleep (?)

I watched another video regarding the matter the other day, and they claimed that they had evidence (?) that in those vaccines there's poison from the "king cobra" snake (?), among other bad stuff. It's creapy, I think. 

[Ani Tefillah]

7 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

Yes, but what purpose is it?

Have you read the UN's "Agenda 2030"? Maybe you'll find the purpose of this "vacation" in there? 

[Riverwalker]

41 minutes ago, teddyv said:

I probably have stock in Pfizer or Moderna (I have no idea) because I have a wide-ranging portfolio of investments and mutual funds.

we are talking major share holders, not mutual funds

[B-B]

8 minutes ago, MonicaWife said:

The video testefies about many whom have died because of the vaccine, and I recall that two or three of them were in their twenties and thirties, and in very good shape before they got the vaccine, and they died in their sleep (?)

I watched another video regarding the matter the other day, and they claimed that they had evidence (?) that in those vaccines there's poison from the "king cobra" snake (?), among other bad stuff. It's creapy, I think. 

Thanks for the vid summary 😊 there are certainly a lot of theories and suggestions re: what the jab itself may contain. 

I'm afraid I'm not in a position to confirm or deny the jabs ingredients/constituents as stated in the video.

I do have possible 'first hand' evidence which could be linked to the adverse effects of the jab - relatives of colleagues (several) who have suffered strokes and TIA's, shortly after receiving the jab. (There was no history of strokes or TIA's in any of the patients, prior to receiving the jabs).

Edited April 19, 2022 by B-B

[Dennis1209]

7 hours ago, Sower said:

Would expect more of this evidence will be exposed as the suppressed facts are revealed. (shedding light)
Feel a sense of guilt for not having been more aggressive sharing/exposing data about discovered vaccine health reactions back when.  Truth should be welcomed to make informed decisions. Truth sets us free. Fear cripples.
We're in this together. God is light.


 
 

I am just going to keep it simple. Knowing what I know, seeing what I witnessed. I have no reason to believe anything the government tells me. So far... One is free to choose.

[missmuffet]

20 minutes ago, Dennis1209 said:

I am just going to keep it simple. Knowing what I know, seeing what I witnessed. I have no reason to believe anything the government tells me. So far... One is free to choose.

Of course life is full of choices. But some of those choices may have consequences. 

[other one]

I have had both shots of Pfizer and the booster...   I've been exposed to covid several times but never had any symptoms.  I have not tested to see if I have had the virus.   I'm 75 and doing fine.

I have several hundred acquaintances both flesh and internet and none of them that have had the shots of miRNA have died.  I do/did have 6 others that did not get the vaccines that died alone in hospitals in a very bad way.

Life is full of choices Muffet, and All have consequences of one thing or another....    some good and some bad.

But if you guys don't want the vaccine I don't have a problem with that as long as they don't want to lock things down over it.....    and if you want to loose a good job over it...   well I guess that's ok too.   Kind of a radical consequence, but it is what it is.

[Starise]

Fact- Many people who got the vaccine also got the virus

Fact- Many healthy people who got the vaccine died after getting the vaccine

Fact- Many people who didn't get the vaccine died.

Fact- Many people who didn't get the vaccine caught the virus and recovered from it.

Does any of the above make any rational sense if the vaccine was really effective the way they said it would be?

Does any of the above make any rational sense if refusal to get the vaccine means getting the virus would kill you?

One common denominator in those who died in hospitals was they either couldn't breathe or the tubes and combination of meds to place the tubes killed them.The other was blood clots as a result of the vaccine.

Later on people who supposedly caught the same virus didn't need the tubes???? The explanation was there were variants.

 

This is why I don't trust anything about this whole thing. For me the only explanation is mixed types of viruses were dispersed and mixed runs of different experimental vaccines were dispersed. Too much inconsistency otherwise.

[teddyv]

1 hour ago, Starise said:

Fact- Many people who got the vaccine also got the virus

Fact- Many healthy people who got the vaccine died after getting the vaccine

Fact- Many people who didn't get the vaccine died.

Fact- Many people who didn't get the vaccine caught the virus and recovered from it.

Does any of the above make any rational sense if the vaccine was really effective the way they said it would be?

Does any of the above make any rational sense if refusal to get the vaccine means getting the virus would kill you?

One common denominator in those who died in hospitals was they either couldn't breathe or the tubes and combination of meds to place the tubes killed them.The other was blood clots as a result of the vaccine.

Later on people who supposedly caught the same virus didn't need the tubes???? The explanation was there were variants.

 

This is why I don't trust anything about this whole thing. For me the only explanation is mixed types of viruses were dispersed and mixed runs of different experimental vaccines were dispersed. Too much inconsistency otherwise.

Define "many". That lack of concrete numbers makes any of your statements starting with "Fact" very subjective. It's just a weasel word.

At population levels, it is no contest. The vaccine was effective with it's intended purpose. 

[Starise]

5 minutes ago, teddyv said:

Define "many". That lack of concrete numbers makes any of your statements starting with "Fact" very subjective. It's just a weasel word.

At population levels, it is no contest. The vaccine was effective with it's intended purpose. 

This is part of the problem. All of the data you see is fed to us from the very same sources behind the vaccine. How far can we go and still claim effectiveness? I will go so far as to say minimally effective or mildly effective. If I were to give the vaccine a score on a scale of 1-10 I'll give it a whimpy 4 on a good day. 

The truth is no one is putting out "concrete numbers". If you nor I can confirm the numbers as claimed, how can we have a credible answer?