Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I saw this and was scary; you can find links to the "interview" all over the net, but here is how Chris Wallace described it.

"I felt as if a mountain was coming down in front of me. "

I was delighted to get the chance to interview former President Clinton. This was the first one-on-one sitdown he's ever given "Fox News Sunday" during our 10 years on the air.

The groundrules were simple--15 minutes--to be divided evenly between questions about the Clinton Global Initiative and anything else I wanted to ask.

I intended to keep to the groundrules. In fact--I prepared 10 questions--5 on the CGI and 5 on other issues.

I began the interview with 2 questions about Mr. Clinton's commitment to humanitarian causes. His answers were cogent and good-humored.

Then--I asked him about his Administration's record in fighting terror--fully intending to come back to CGI later (as indeed I did).

I asked what I thought was a non-confrontational question about whether he could have done more to "connect the dots and really go after al Qaeda."

I was utterly surprised by the tidal wave of details--emotion--and political attacks that followed.

The President was clearly stung by any suggestion that he had not done everything he could to get bin Laden. He attacked right-wingers--accused me of a "conservative hit job"--and even spun a theory I still don't understand that somehow Fox was trying to cover up the fact that NewsCorp. chief Rupert Murdoch was supporting his Global Initiative. I still have no idea what set him off.

Former President Clinton is a very big man. As he leaned forward--wagging his finger in my face--and then poking the notes I was holding--I felt as if a mountain was coming down in front of me.

The President said I had a smirk. Actually--it was sheer wonder at what I was witnessing.

I tried repeatedly to adhere to the ground rules--to move the President along--and back to the CGI. But he wanted to keep talking about his record fighting terror.

When it became clear he wanted to throw out the ground rules--then I just went with the flow of the interview.

From FishBowlDC


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  454
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/30/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/19/1985

Posted

He doesn't want to be blamed for his ingornance......


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
The video is available for anyone to see by searching that video service we cannot link to from Worthy. But don't expect to see a melt-down and consider the source -- Fox. He could hardly be called unhinged though. He showed the same amount of frustration as Bush did when he went off on the Republicans who stood up against him during the whole torture "media" blitz.

I am curious what you believe Clinton to be ignorant about though.

He doesn't want to be blamed for his ingornance......

River, I just watched it again; it was definitely a melt-down. And Chris Wallace is not a Republican nor a conservative. And Fox is a more legitmate news source than CNN these days. But I will say the things Clinton claimed re: his attempts to get Bin Laden are not at all false. He did his "best," as he says, but alas, no cigar. I would not fault Clinton--he really had no co-operation from the FBI or CIA or the Pentagon. Of course, he was distracted through part of his term, which didn't help his cause any.


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  32
  • Topic Count:  679
  • Topics Per Day:  0.09
  • Content Count:  60,010
  • Content Per Day:  7.64
  • Reputation:   31,382
  • Days Won:  327
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

well, I watched the interview when it aired and I say he had a smirk.... he may not have realized it was a smirk but it was a smirk. I'll not get into what I personally think of Clinton or the thread might get locked and George might actually just kick me off the boards, but I would say that Clinton really made several good points this morning about Fox News.

Have any of you read Richard Clark's book???????

sam


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Have any of you read Richard Clark's book???????

sam

Yes. I won't comment on it's veracity.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  115
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  8,281
  • Content Per Day:  1.06
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  03/03/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  10/30/1955

Posted

Well, I'm no Cinton fan, but this was hardly a 'melt-down.' I think for Bill Clinton this was certainly an emotional point, as he is usually quite controlled. Some of what he said is plainly disingenuous, but 'animated' is more accurate than 'outburst'!

Would God he had been so animated about getting Bin Laden while he was in office!


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,464
  • Content Per Day:  0.96
  • Reputation:   8,810
  • Days Won:  57
  • Joined:  03/30/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/12/1952

Posted

I saw the interview twice...I recall he shook that same finger in the face of the American people when he declared that " I did not have sex with that woman Monica Lewinski" I didn't believe him then and I was right and I don't believe him now. The man is unable to tell the truth about anything.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I am NO fan of Bill's, but I do know he did make an effort to get Bin Laden during his second term. He got NO co-operation from the Pentagon. At least in that he was telling the truth. The problem was we had no respect for his leadership or the people around him, who were more corrupt than he was.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
but I would say that Clinton really made several good points this morning about Fox News.

What's wrong - Democrats can't stand "turn about" treatment. :b:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  135
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,537
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   157
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  04/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/29/1956

Posted

I think he over reacted for sure, but by and large it was a good interview, and I am no Bill Clinton fan. We all get frustrated and defensive when we feel people are attacking us about something, and since I'm sure he has heard that jab about Bin Laden numerous times, he got defensive.

I don't think the reporter was smirking, I think he was kinda in shock that Mr. Clinton reacted the way he did.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 14 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...