Assange: I'll reveal info that will spark Arab world coups

[MorningGlory]

This guy is being put up to this by someone. He really ought to be holed up somewhere and fast. I'd say I'm not sure why the U.S. Government is letting him run around free like he is, but I already know why. Barack Obama stated very clearly before he was elected exactly what his plans for this Nation were.

Sleep on America.

Hummmm, maybe to justify tight control on the internet. We'll see as the year unfolds.

The U.S. doesn't control the internet; in fact I'm not sure if anyone does. It's worldwide and very difficult to police. Unless you can get every country on earth to agree to something......I don't see THAT happening though.

Otherone already pointed out how access can be denied, but don't you remember how China, Iran have internet access shut down in their countries? And if one doesn't think that can't happen here isn't seeing the whole pic. Each step, each piece of legistlature here and around the world brings us closer to a one world governance, not order anymore but governance where all heads of state will govern by global law. I agree with OO also that Assange is being led and financed by someone else yet unknown.

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

[other one]

This guy is being put up to this by someone. He really ought to be holed up somewhere and fast. I'd say I'm not sure why the U.S. Government is letting him run around free like he is, but I already know why. Barack Obama stated very clearly before he was elected exactly what his plans for this Nation were.

Sleep on America.

Hummmm, maybe to justify tight control on the internet. We'll see as the year unfolds.

The U.S. doesn't control the internet; in fact I'm not sure if anyone does. It's worldwide and very difficult to police. Unless you can get every country on earth to agree to something......I don't see THAT happening though.

Otherone already pointed out how access can be denied, but don't you remember how China, Iran have internet access shut down in their countries? And if one doesn't think that can't happen here isn't seeing the whole pic. Each step, each piece of legistlature here and around the world brings us closer to a one world governance, not order anymore but governance where all heads of state will govern by global law. I agree with OO also that Assange is being led and financed by someone else yet unknown.

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

Whoever it was who wrote the Protocols Totally evil as that little book was/is, that same outcome was exactly what they were out to achieve..

[MorningGlory]

This guy is being put up to this by someone. He really ought to be holed up somewhere and fast. I'd say I'm not sure why the U.S. Government is letting him run around free like he is, but I already know why. Barack Obama stated very clearly before he was elected exactly what his plans for this Nation were.

Sleep on America.

Hummmm, maybe to justify tight control on the internet. We'll see as the year unfolds.

The U.S. doesn't control the internet; in fact I'm not sure if anyone does. It's worldwide and very difficult to police. Unless you can get every country on earth to agree to something......I don't see THAT happening though.

Otherone already pointed out how access can be denied, but don't you remember how China, Iran have internet access shut down in their countries? And if one doesn't think that can't happen here isn't seeing the whole pic. Each step, each piece of legistlature here and around the world brings us closer to a one world governance, not order anymore but governance where all heads of state will govern by global law. I agree with OO also that Assange is being led and financed by someone else yet unknown.

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

Whoever it was who wrote the Protocols Totally evil as that little book was/is, that same outcome was exactly what they were out to achieve..

Who are 'they'?

[other one]

This guy is being put up to this by someone. He really ought to be holed up somewhere and fast. I'd say I'm not sure why the U.S. Government is letting him run around free like he is, but I already know why. Barack Obama stated very clearly before he was elected exactly what his plans for this Nation were.

Sleep on America.

Hummmm, maybe to justify tight control on the internet. We'll see as the year unfolds.

The U.S. doesn't control the internet; in fact I'm not sure if anyone does. It's worldwide and very difficult to police. Unless you can get every country on earth to agree to something......I don't see THAT happening though.

Otherone already pointed out how access can be denied, but don't you remember how China, Iran have internet access shut down in their countries? And if one doesn't think that can't happen here isn't seeing the whole pic. Each step, each piece of legistlature here and around the world brings us closer to a one world governance, not order anymore but governance where all heads of state will govern by global law. I agree with OO also that Assange is being led and financed by someone else yet unknown.

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

Whoever it was who wrote the Protocols Totally evil as that little book was/is, that same outcome was exactly what they were out to achieve..

Who are 'they'?

The origional set was Nimrod.

[Guest yod]

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

The person or persons with the most to gain by the chaos it produces. Until this point in history, Americans haven't experienced what the rest of the world knows. Chaos happens all the time in world history.

For some in history, it represents "opportunity" to be a dictator. Ruining economies hasn't emotionally or politically harmed George Soros, for example. Do you think that class of people care what others want? Is there a link between him and Assange?

Controlling the free flow of information is the only way this administration can hang on to power. They've already shown a propensity to intimidate media AND THE SUPREME COURT, do you really think they care whether capitalism survives? If this bunch can shut down free speech against them, they will.

I hope this wikileaks thing isn't the Reichstaag Fire, but either way, I think it's already too late.

Happy new year!

[MorningGlory]

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

The person or persons with the most to gain by the chaos it produces. Until this point in history, Americans haven't experienced what the rest of the world knows. Chaos happens all the time in world history.

For some in history, it represents "opportunity" to be a dictator. Ruining economies hasn't emotionally or politically harmed George Soros, for example. Do you think that class of people care what others want? Is there a link between him and Assange?

Controlling the free flow of information is the only way this administration can hang on to power. They've already shown a propensity to intimidate media AND THE SUPREME COURT, do you really think they care whether capitalism survives? If this bunch can shut down free speech against them, they will.

I hope this wikileaks thing isn't the Reichstaag Fire, but either way, I think it's already too late.

Happy new year!

So you believe our current President is trying to restrict information, via controlling the internet, to become a dictator? What makes you say that? If Obama is so powerful, how come he couldn't hang on to control of Congress? I have to again point out that the internet is NOT controlled by the U.S.

[Gerioke]

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

The person or persons with the most to gain by the chaos it produces. Until this point in history, Americans haven't experienced what the rest of the world knows. Chaos happens all the time in world history.

For some in history, it represents "opportunity" to be a dictator. Ruining economies hasn't emotionally or politically harmed George Soros, for example. Do you think that class of people care what others want? Is there a link between him and Assange?

Controlling the free flow of information is the only way this administration can hang on to power. They've already shown a propensity to intimidate media AND THE SUPREME COURT, do you really think they care whether capitalism survives? If this bunch can shut down free speech against them, they will.

I hope this wikileaks thing isn't the Reichstaag Fire, but either way, I think it's already too late.

Happy new year!

So you believe our current President is trying to restrict information, via controlling the internet, to become a dictator? What makes you say that? If Obama is so powerful, how come he couldn't hang on to control of Congress? I have to again point out that the internet is NOT controlled by the U.S.

Why would Obabam need to control congress, when the Republicans and the Democrats seek the same ends. One World Government?

[nebula]

So you believe our current President is trying to restrict information, via controlling the internet, to become a dictator? What makes you say that? If Obama is so powerful, how come he couldn't hang on to control of Congress?

He's explained it all before on numerous occasions.

I have to again point out that the internet is NOT controlled by the U.S.

Regulations can change a lot of things.

[MorningGlory]

So you believe our current President is trying to restrict information, via controlling the internet, to become a dictator? What makes you say that? If Obama is so powerful, how come he couldn't hang on to control of Congress?

He's explained it all before on numerous occasions.

I have to again point out that the internet is NOT controlled by the U.S.

Regulations can change a lot of things.

And I'd like for HIM to explain it again....if you don't mind.

[MorningGlory]

I know that totalitarian governments shut down or restrict access to the internet in their countries. My point is that no ONE country is in control of the internet. Have you noticed any curtailment of your internet access? Shutting down the internet wordwide would topple economies and cause billions to riot. Who is going to sign on to that?

The person or persons with the most to gain by the chaos it produces. Until this point in history, Americans haven't experienced what the rest of the world knows. Chaos happens all the time in world history.

For some in history, it represents "opportunity" to be a dictator. Ruining economies hasn't emotionally or politically harmed George Soros, for example. Do you think that class of people care what others want? Is there a link between him and Assange?

Controlling the free flow of information is the only way this administration can hang on to power. They've already shown a propensity to intimidate media AND THE SUPREME COURT, do you really think they care whether capitalism survives? If this bunch can shut down free speech against them, they will.

I hope this wikileaks thing isn't the Reichstaag Fire, but either way, I think it's already too late.

Happy new year!

So you believe our current President is trying to restrict information, via controlling the internet, to become a dictator? What makes you say that? If Obama is so powerful, how come he couldn't hang on to control of Congress? I have to again point out that the internet is NOT controlled by the U.S.

Why would Obabam need to control congress, when the Republicans and the Democrats seek the same ends. One World Government?

The President, in controlling Congress, has had the ability to push his agenda into law; until the mid-term elections ended that. I can't think of any way controlling the U.S. Congress would help one control the world though.