angels4u

When Nations turn against Israel

36 posts in this topic

4 hours ago, n2thelight said:

What exactly did Obama do?

He coordinated then refused to veto a UN decoration from the UN that basically set in motion to punish Israel if they did not agree to a settlement with the Palestinian's that would pretty much put them into a completely defenseless position..

Two it tried to solidify a two state solution which would divide the land given to Israel both by God in the beginning and earlier UN resolutions......    and God has made some serious threats against people who would divide his land given to the Nation of Israel.  I do not want to be among those people, so I ask the Lord to deal with the people behind this and not our whole nation.

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, other one said:

He coordinated then refused to veto a UN decoration from the UN that basically set in motion to punish Israel if they did not agree to a settlement with the Palestinian's that would pretty much put them into a completely defenseless position..

Two it tried to solidify a two state solution which would divide the land given to Israel both by God in the beginning and earlier UN resolutions......    and God has made some serious threats against people who would divide his land given to the Nation of Israel.  I do not want to be among those people, so I ask the Lord to deal with the people behind this and not our whole nation.

 

Thanks for explaining,was thinking it was racial,as so many have disrespected him throughout his term...But one must also understand where the true power is...

Again thanks for an honest answer.I will look into it.

I know he's signed a lot of executive orders as presidents have before him,that must also don't know about...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Truth, “No president in history has done more for Israel’s security than Obama”

By Sarah Jones on Mon, Feb 9th, 2015 at 11:16 am

Republicans hope to paint Democrats as “anti-American” “Nazis” if they don’t attend Netanyahu’s speech, but President Obama has done more for Israel’s security than any other president.

Conservatives are desperately trying to paint a Democratic revolt against the blatant attempts of Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu to humiliate and defy the sitting U.S. President and hijack the United States’ foreign policy — letting Israel not only dictate our policy with Iran but humiliate our President in the doing — as Democrats having “contempt” for Israel.

Yet, Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Colin H. Kahl wrote for Foreign Policy in August of 2012, “No president in history has done more for Israel’s security than Obama”. He made a darn good case for this claim, and the facts would humiliate thinking, non-delusional people:

… As the Defense Department official with primary responsibility for enhancing Israel’s defense capabilities and deepening joint military cooperation with the United States from 2009 to 2011, I can attest to a different reality: No president in history has done more for Israel’s security than Obama.

The case for Obama’s Israel policy begins with record-high levels of Foreign Military Financing (FMF). The Obama administration has increased security assistance to Israel every single year since the president took office, providing nearly $10 billion in aid — covering roughly a fifth of Israel’s defense budget — over the past three years. To put this in perspective, this is about 20 percent higher than the remaining six dozen recipients of U.S. FMF combined. Historic aid levels have been complemented by other steps to ensure Israel’s unrivaled military advantage in the region, including high-level consultation with Israeli officials on U.S. arms sales to the region, operational cooperation to improve Israel’s conventional military and counterterrorism capabilities, and providing Israel with advanced technology, such as the fifth-generation stealth Joint Strike Fighter, to which no other state in the Middle East has access.

Under Obama’s direction, the United States has also deepened defense cooperation aimed at helping Israel address its most pressing security concerns, including rocket and missile threats emanating from the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. When then-Senator Obama traveled to Israel in 2008, it wasn’t for a political fundraiser. Instead, he visited Israeli victims of Palestinian rocket fire in the southern town of Sderot, declaring “I came to Sderot with a commitment to Israel’s security.” These were not just words. As president, Obama has championed efforts to provide Israel with $275 million over and above its annual FMF to help finance Iron Dome, an anti-rocket system that has already saved Israeli lives by intercepting approximately 90 percent of projectiles launched against protected areas in the country’s south in the past year.

The humiliation of the sitting U.S. President was yet another petty Republican conspiracy with Speaker Boehner-level fail all over it. Not only is it backfiring, but their attempts to spin the backfire in their favor only serve to bring up facts that they can ill afford to have highlighted.

It turns out that under the fevered, hate-filled rhetoric of madcap conservatives (bizarrely calling Democrats “anti-American” for standing up against a power grab by a foreign country), Republicans think they can use this to paint Democrats as “Nazis”.

Demonstrating a troubling disregard for the horrific tragedies enacted by the actual Nazis, a commenter opined at the Federalist Papers (one of many places these comments have surfaced), “No fate, but what we make….The GOP, will be able to paint them as Jewish hating elitist Nazi, party in the election. LETS ROLL!!!!!!!!”

And then, James Woods gave us this:

 Follow

James Woods ✔@RealJamesWoods

Dems might skip Netanyahu - POLITICO - I would love to see Biden/Pelosi show their contempt for Israel. #truecolorshttp://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/democrats-might-skip-benjamin-netanyahu-speech-114891.html …

4:24 PM - 5 Feb 2015

A Bibi boycott?

Joe Biden is among those not committed to attending his address to Congress.

politico.com

 

 469469 Retweets

 

 321321 likes

Yeah, that’s totally legit. Except President Obama, a Democrat, has done more for Israel’s security than any other president.

As White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest explained in a briefing on February 4th, “(O)ne of the concerns about the breach in protocol that we’ve seen and articulated is that it might cause some to view the relationship between the United States and Israel as a relationship between one political party in Israel and one political party in the United States. The President does not believe that would be a positive development in our relationship.”

Israel is spitting in the face of the man who has bent over backward to help Israel, and trying to destroy his nuclear negotiations with Iran — a matter that impacts us all, not just Netanhayu and his right wing craving for war and blood.

Ultimately, Republicans hope to turn Democrats standing up for protocol and U.S authority over its own foreign policy into an attack on Democrats, claiming they have “contempt” for Israel and calling them “anti-patriotic”. But it’s clear that it is Republicans who have shown contempt for their own country, in a groveling move to hand U.S. power over to a foreign leader just to spite the man in the White House.

  Ambassador, Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Iran, Israel, Israel–United States relations, John Boehner, Josh Earnest, middle east, Obama Administration, politics, press secretary, Prime Minister, Republican Party, sitting U.S. President, Speaker, United States, White House

Follow Sarah Jones on Twitter

The Truth, “No president in history has done more for Israel’s security than Obama” added by Sarah Jones on Mon, Feb 9th, 2015
View all posts by Sarah Jones →

 

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/02/09/reminder-republicans-no-president-history-israels-security-obama.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BBC Documentary on the USS Liberty:
"Dead in the Water"

 

 

"If it was an accident, it was the best planned accident I've ever heard of" - USS Liberty survivor

Cover-Up Alleged in Probe of USS Liberty

A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an accident.

In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's inquiry to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."

It was “one of the classic all-American cover-ups,” said retired Admiral Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins.

liberty_torp.jpg
Torpedo hole in USS Liberty

“Why would our government put Israel’s interests ahead of our own?” Moorer asked from his wheelchair at the news conference. He was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack.

Moorer, who has long held that the attack was a deliberate act, wants Congress to investigate. [Newsday]

Israel claims the USS Liberty was mistaken for the out-of-service Egyptian horse carrier El Quseir - can you spot the difference?

selquseir2.jpg
El Quseir

sliberty2.jpg
USS Liberty

According to a 1981 NSA report on the incident, the El Quseir "was approximately one-quarter of the Liberty's tonnage, about one-half its length, and offered a radically different silhouette."

Photos of attack on USS Liberty
Click images for full sized photos

TINY_Int-5.jpg
The assault was initiated by French-built high performance Mirage jets armed with cannons and rockets
TINY_Int-331.jpg
After the ship was disabled by aircraft cannon, rockets and napalm, Israeli torpedo boats were sent in
TINY_Int-21.jpg TINY_Int-21d.jpg

Crews mess hall used as an emergency room

TINY_Int-1.jpg
Liberty deck crew resting after recovering bodies of shipmates
TINY_Int-12.jpg

30mm cannon holes
GTR 5 USS Liberty

TINY_Int-8.jpg

30mm cannon holes
GTR 5 USS Liberty

Fifteen years after the attack, an Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.

Later, a dual-citizen Israeli major told survivors that he was in an Israeli war room where he heard that pilot's radio report. The attacking pilots and everyone in the Israeli war room knew that they were attacking an American ship, the major said. He recanted the statement only after he received threatening phone calls from Israel.

The pilot's protests also were heard by radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon. Then-U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter has confirmed this. Porter told his story to syndicated columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak and offered to submit to further questioning by authorities. Unfortunately, no one in the U.S. government has any interest in hearing these first-person accounts of Israeli treachery. [Washington Report]


"Then, inexplicably, at 2 p.m., unmarked Israeli aircraft began attacking the ship." [Ledger Enquirer]

Israel attacked the USS Liberty using UNMARKED AIRCRAFT. This is the single fact which proves Israel knew exactly who they were attacking. Israel's story is that they thought USS Liberty was an Egyptian ship and therefore a legitimate target of war. Were that true, there would be no reason to attack a supposedly Egyptian ship with unmarked aircraft. The only possible reason to use unmarked aircraft to attack the ship is that Israel knew it was an American ship and intended to sink it, then to blame the attack on Egypt.

Moorer, who as top legal council to the official investigation is in a position to know, agrees that Israel intended to sink the USS Liberty and blame Egypt for it, thus dragging the United States into a war on Israel's behalf. This seems to be a common trick of Israel. Starting with the Lavon affair, through the USS Liberty, to the fake radio transmitter that tricked Reagan into attacking Libya, to potentially 9-11 itself, Israel's game is to frame Arabs and set them up as targets for the United States.

The official US investigation is discredited. And with it, every claim of innocence for Israel that relied on the official investigation as a source.

The real question facing the American people is why the US Government seems more concerned with protecting Israel after they are caught playing these dirty tricks, rather than doing something to convince Israel not to kill any more Americans.

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.

See also: Is Israel blackmailing America?

That nation state of Israel is not what most think it is,as it's being run by those who call themselves Jews but are not....

As for the scripture that says those who bless Israel,please find out who Israel is...

 

Genesis 12:3 "And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.""

God's Word and God's people do bless the peoples of the earth in many ways. Abram listened  to God and believed what God had told him. Then he acted upon what God had said. We read in Galatians 3:17; "And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after [the flood], cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect."

Paul is telling us that this covenant that God made with Abram four hundred and thirty years after Noah's flood was not done away with by the "New Covenant", which is confirmed in Christ. They are both in effect, and they are both eternal. Part of the Abrahamic covenant will be fulfilled in the Millennium, but it has and will continue right through this day.

Today; Israel [the Christian Nations] around the world are prospering and well blessed, and from it the entire world is being fed.

Anyway you'll keep on falling for the foolishness........

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites