Analyze why Trump won and Hillary lost

[missmuffet]

1 hour ago, ayin jade said:

Not one president has ever been able to carry through with each one of their campaign promises so I wont hold him accountable if he fails to carry through with some of them. (After all congress and the senate can interfer with that.) However what I expect to see is attempts made to carry through with them. I expect he will make the border less porous and start the wall being built in arizona like it was supposed to be built years ago. I do not expect it to happen before he takes office or even within the first few months. 

So if a voter is not looking at what a candidate promises because they know they will not be able to carry out those promises what is the point? We will not be able to see the full impact until he takes office but there is a lot out there now regarding where he is going with America.

[missmuffet]

How many voters do you think did not vote for Hillary because they did not want a woman President?

[Willa]

I don't think that the sex had as much to do with it as her proven lack of character--Ben Ghazi, graft [pay per view], lying under oath, and the same Marxist agenda.  But she probably got the lesbian vote.  

The biggest reason I voted for Trump is that he promised to appoint conservative judges.  

Some of the bussed in demonstrators have admitted to being paid to demonstrate by Soro, and I think that community organizers are also paid since that is the first job Obama held.  

I just hope that all those people whining that they want to leave the country will do so.  We don't need them here if they hate us.  Nor do we need anarchists, rioters and people who want to destroy us.

[ayin jade]

1 hour ago, missmuffet said:

So if a voter is not looking at what a candidate promises because they know they will not be able to carry out those promises what is the point? We will not be able to see the full impact until he takes office but there is a lot out there now regarding where he is going with America.

Because I know he will try to accomplish it all and succeed at some of them. What he wants to accomplish is more in line with what I want to see done than what hillary or any of the third party choices would do. 

It seems like he isnt even in office yet and folks are tearing him down for not getting anything done lol.

[missmuffet]

1 hour ago, Davida said:

I think she got an untold number of votes from young women & feminists just because of her gender.

But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President?

[Ezra]

4 hours ago, Out of the Shadows said:

Reuters is an international news agency that has nothing to do with the DNC or Hillary Clinton. 

Well Reuters polls were rigged as much as anyone else's.

[missmuffet]

5 minutes ago, Davida said:

I know none.  Any one like Hillary did who places her female gender as a Campaign platform deserves to have that backfire in her face.  It is totally wrong to vote because of gender or race as people did for Obama and we saw how mistaken that was.

But it happens if people want to admit it or not.

[Ezra]

7 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President?

They were right, since is a CRIMINAL woman President would do untold harm. And in any event, this is not really a job for women. Check out all the tears from Clinton, Abedin, and left-liberal female celebs and media personalities.

I am also strongly opposed to having women mixed with men is services such as the armed forces, police forces, fire-fighting etc. There is bound to sexual tension, on-the-romances, accusations of sexual assaults (whether true or false), and just a lot of nonsense which is not necessary.  

However there is no reason while strictly female divisions cannot be created in these services. And women should definitely not be on the battlefield, since there are plenty of other jobs they can do. As was noted for Marines, the physical standards had to be lowered for women.

[Guest shiloh357]

14 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President?

Men have no problem with a woman president, generally speaking.  Most of us would vote for a woman who demonstrated that she was capable and ready to be president.  You might have pockets of those who would oppose it, but they would be the minority.

 

[Churchmouse]

11 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President?

What about all the women who can't stand someone using an irrelevant issue like sex to support a run for office?  Martin Luther King once said he would be happy when his children would be counted by the content of their character instead of the color of their skin. What's less important the color of the skin or the sex of the person in that skin?

 

Identify politics are the cesspool of the liberal elites and you see where they are today.