Saul the Pharisees vs Paul the Apostle. No difference really.

[frienduff thaylorde]

4 hours ago, Yowm said:

You said people are entitled to their opinions.

I said I'll go with Peter's opinion (not that it is an opinion, but it is God's Word) over any opinion on this board.

Now you say 'how unfortunate'.

Could you please explain why my statement is 'unfortunate'?

Its unfortunate for the other , cause you brought what PETER had said, and still they dance around it.  

[WalkingMyFishLikeABoss]

18 minutes ago, frienduff thaylorde said:

Its unfortunate for the other , cause you brought what PETER had said, and still they dance around it.  

No, it is unfortunate that an irreverent attitude that seeks to insult Peter, and Jesus too as another member did , is thought to be a valid remark in the discussion of Apologetics and the Pauline epistles.

Perhaps you can notice later on that someone telling a Christian to go ask a dead Apostle for clarification is insulting the dead Apostle. While revealing their own contempt for said Apostle. Or not. We'll see by how you remark to this observation.

[notsolostsoul]

17 hours ago, Sojourner414 said:

No, verified historical information by Dr. Erwin W. Lutzer.

You insist on declaring the portion of Scripture that the Lord inspired Paul to pen as not valid, yet you say you follow Jesus. Peter recognized Paul's letters as Scripture, yet you now insist he must be lying as well.

I have posted my points and evidence to back them up: you have not. Sadly, I will no longer reply to any of your comments: you have demonstrated that you are not here to learn, but to pull others into your error.

 

Jests is not Paul nor Peter nor any Apostle.

I follow Jesus, infallible, sinless, God in flesh, JESUS.

You can follow fallible, sinful MAN if you want.

No MAN, no matter how much inspired by The Spirit means more to me than JESUS.

JESUS IS CHRIST, My Christianity, my faith is in him.

I didn't call any liars nor invalid. I just said PAUL don't sit right with me so I test. Upon my testing I seeked his background, and from seeing where he came from, I now understand why he don't sit well with ME. The adding to what Jesus said and the way PAUL FOLLOWERS use his teachings are very similar to the way he was as a Pharisee.

[Omegaman 3.0]

5 hours ago, notsolostsoul said:

Jests is not Paul nor Peter nor any Apostle.

I follow Jesus, infallible, sinless, God in flesh, JESUS.

You can follow fallible, sinful MAN if you want.

Interesting, since you would not know about the sinless, infallible, God in flesh, if not for the testimony of the fallible sinners who wrote His story, why do you trust people who could be lying or mistaken, about anything regarding Jesus? Were they telling the truth, when they said that Jesus said they would recall the things He did?

Just strange, in my opinion.

[Guest shiloh357]

7 hours ago, notsolostsoul said:

Jests is not Paul nor Peter nor any Apostle.

I follow Jesus, infallible, sinless, God in flesh, JESUS.

You can follow fallible, sinful MAN if you want.

No MAN, no matter how much inspired by The Spirit means more to me than JESUS.

JESUS IS CHRIST, My Christianity, my faith is in him.

I didn't call any liars nor invalid. I just said PAUL don't sit right with me so I test. Upon my testing I seeked his background, and from seeing where he came from, I now understand why he don't sit well with ME. The adding to what Jesus said and the way PAUL FOLLOWERS use his teachings are very similar to the way he was as a Pharisee.

Well the problem is that the Word of God is what doesn't sit right with you.   Paul's words in the are Scripture and are inspired by the Holy Spirit.  Paul's words are a transmission from God to Paul.  Paul's words agree 100% with Jesus and a real Christian would know that.   Paul glorifies Jesus and points to people to Jesus consistently in His epistles and your criticisms of Paul prove you don't know or read the read the Scriptures.

So it is God and His Word that doesn't right with you.  You need to repent, believe the Gospel, get saved. 

[Steve_S]

This one has ran its course, lots of good responses though.