Spock Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,239 Content Per Day: 0.86 Reputation: 1,686 Days Won: 6 Joined: 12/26/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 Just now, ayin jade said: Actually there is a disadvantage to tats that can be harmful to ones health. (I am not saying someone is in sin if they have or get any tattoos though.) Certain colors in tattoos make it quite difficult to get an mri. Red especially. So if you end up needing an mri and you have a tattoo ... you are in some difficulty. Wow, I didn’t know that. I’m glad my daughter does not have red in her tats. (I’m tat-less) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.88 Content Count: 43,795 Content Per Day: 6.21 Reputation: 11,243 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 16 minutes ago, Spock said: I don’t mind some 40% polyester in my shirts so I don’t have to iron them. As you know, 100% cotton means WRINKLES GALORE! Ugh! After all, I have to look good out on the golf course...? It is 110 today. I would melt in synthetic. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spock Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,239 Content Per Day: 0.86 Reputation: 1,686 Days Won: 6 Joined: 12/26/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 14 minutes ago, warrior12 said: I would think that verse 7 gives the reason and has nothing to do with temple prostitutes. Anyway, I hope my response is within the topic and if not I will move on if anyone objects to my reasoning in referencing head coverings and women dress when in church. I agree....head covering does seem off topic. I will remove mine. Why don’t you start one on that subject, brother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spock Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 29 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,239 Content Per Day: 0.86 Reputation: 1,686 Days Won: 6 Joined: 12/26/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, BeauJangles said: Just a comment here, though opting out quite a few pages back. The only mark on the body that one would have due concern, would be the mark of the Beast. Now, I realize that in theory it will be a microchip and not an actual tattoo. But, it's also difficult to imagine authorities running around with handy scanners to ID everyone. It seems to reason, the identification should readily be seen. Just a thought. Here's something to note... Chargma - The Mark in Mark of the Beast. The Greek word for mark is chargma. Strong's Concordance defines chargma as "a scratch or etching", "a badge of servitude", "graven", and finally "mark". Strong's also notes that chargma is directly related to the Greek word charax, which means "to sharpen to a point" and also describes "a stake". If I’m around (don’t think I will be) but if I am, I will be sure to say no to that one too! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steward George Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Steward Followers: 110 Topic Count: 10,465 Topics Per Day: 1.26 Content Count: 27,773 Content Per Day: 3.33 Reputation: 15,463 Days Won: 129 Joined: 06/30/2001 Status: Online Birthday: 09/21/1971 Steward Share Posted July 14, 2019 I banned Firm Foundation and Bloodbought from this thread as they hijacked the thread into their own debate which has been going on in many other threads on the forums. Stick to the topic! 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.88 Content Count: 43,795 Content Per Day: 6.21 Reputation: 11,243 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, Spock said: Wow, I didn’t know that. I’m glad my daughter does not have red in her tats. (I’m tat-less) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445217/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.88 Content Count: 43,795 Content Per Day: 6.21 Reputation: 11,243 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 18 minutes ago, warrior12 said: I would think that verse 7 gives the reason and has nothing to do with temple prostitutes. Anyway, I hope my response is within the topic and if not I will move on if anyone objects to my reasoning in referencing head coverings and women dress when in church. 3 minutes ago, Spock said: I agree....head covering does seem off topic. I will remove mine. Why don’t you start one on that subject, brother? Yes please start a topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 14, 2019 (edited) 16 minutes ago, BeauJangles said: Just a comment here, though opting out quite a few pages back. The only mark on the body that one would have due concern, would be the mark of the Beast. Now, I realize that in theory it will be a microchip and not an actual tattoo. But, it's also difficult to imagine authorities running around with handy scanners to ID everyone. It seems to reason, the identification should readily be seen. Just a thought. Here's something to note... Chargma - The Mark in Mark of the Beast. The Greek word for mark is chargma. Strong's Concordance defines chargma as "a scratch or etching", "a badge of servitude", "graven", and finally "mark". Strong's also notes that chargma is directly related to the Greek word charax, which means "to sharpen to a point" and also describes "a stake". Perhaps the MOB will have a nice tattoo with it. The tattoo combined with a very sophisticated tech device chip would really attract people. Kind of like how people have fallen in love with smart phones. Edited July 14, 2019 by missmuffet 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who me Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Royal Member Followers: 5 Topic Count: 17 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,300 Content Per Day: 1.72 Reputation: 1,685 Days Won: 0 Joined: 01/27/2019 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 On 12 July 2019 at 8:33 PM, Spock said: Just curious Do you keep all 613, or at least the ones you are able to? I know you can’t follow the laws related to the Temple since there is no temple. https://havurahshirhadash.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/mitzvot1.pdf Jesus fulfilled All the ceremonial and ritual laws in his death and resurection. So as Paul made clear it is the law, the 10 commandments we up hold. That says nothing about what the OT says about tatoos, except it was forbidding pagan practices. So should a Christian do something with pagan roots/meanings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted July 14, 2019 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 597 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,116 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,847 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 14, 2019 7 hours ago, Spock said: Okay FF....on this we can find agreement. I agree, food doesn’t defile us although it can put us at risk with high cholesterol if we don’t eat in moderation. And yes, cigarettes can also harm us by polluting our lungs. This reminds me of something Solomon said.....people can cause their own premature death. But.....I don’t see how tattoos can harm ones health. (Staying on topic) https://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-and-treatments/news/20160826/how-safe-tattoo-ink#1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts