Can vaccinations be weaponized?

[NotAllThere]

2 hours ago, JohnD said:

The pandemic itself is "Part A."

Interesting how little attention is being given 

the manufacturing and spread  of COVID 19.

No. It isn't. That's just tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy paranoia. "The Gummint's out to get us!!!".  Also, bear in mind that the pursuit of hidden knowledge, only known the the enlightened, is essentially Gnosticism. So next time you're tempted to say "Wake up SHEEPLE", you could be indulging in that ancient heresy. 

The only global conspiracy is Satan trying to lure people into not having saving faith. Part of that is spreading fear, doubt and paranoia. Don't be distracted from what's important. I.e. faith in Jesus Christ.

Edited December 8, 2020 by NotAllThere

[other one]

2 hours ago, JohnD said:

I don't want to put a scare into anyone, but given the

nature of man and how everyone wants to change / dominate the world...

who's to say if the new vaccination

is not "Part B" of a two part biological chipping of all mankind?

The pandemic itself is "Part A."

Interesting how little attention is being given 

the manufacturing and spread  of COVID 19.

does one want to bet their life or well being on that theory?   I think people are way too sensitive about this biological chipping thing....   when it comes time for the mark there will not be a question about it.

As for the OP question about vaccines being weaponized; anything can be weaponized.

 

I think most of us would agree that this virus is not natural....   now if someone made this with the idea of making us all take a vaccine for it; which would you do....    kill off the people who would go along with you and take the vaccine, or would you kill off the people who rebelled against everyone taking the vaccine and refusing to do so.

[Alive]

I don't believe for a moment that any of this has anything to do with the antichrist character or the mark. I do have other reservations, though.

[missmuffet]

I could see chipping with vaccines possible in the 7 year tribulation but not now. 

[Marathoner]

Honestly... RFID chips aren't needed to track people. I run the risk of inflaming the paranoid by pointing out the obvious but seeing as how what I'm pointing out are facts and nothing but, the consequences are out of my hands. 

Satellites. Satellite surveillance has been around for decades. 

Your digital media devices.

Facial recognition driven by artificial intelligence. 

Your activity in cyberspace is an open book to intelligence agencies. 

Monetary transactions, something which law enforcement agencies use to establish the whereabouts of persons of interest.

You can run but you can't hide: thermal imaging technology can register variances in temperature which boggles the mind. After the military I did a brief stint with Lockheed, assembling circuit boards for the targeting and vision system of the Apache attack helicopter. An engineer from the finishing plant paid us a visit one day to demonstrate what our work could do.

Looking through the lens of the camera, he swiped a finger on the wall to show us the sensitivity of the product: it appeared as an angry red mark on the wall. We walked away while he explained what each process in our facility was responsible for... we came back 30 minutes later and the angry red mark on the wall was still visible. 

To be informed is to be vaccinated against woo and nonsense peddled by fearmongers. 

[NotAllThere]

1 hour ago, other one said:

I think most of us would agree that this virus is not natural....   

This isn't the case. Well - most of the people here might. But out in the real world anyone in my circles who tries to promote such an idea will be laughed at. Because all the peer reviewed evidence is that it has come about quite naturally - not through any laboratory.

If you believe otherwise, then you're bang into the conspiracies again. And if you're into them, then there is no debate to be had.

[Marathoner]

1 hour ago, NotAllThere said:

This isn't the case. Well - most of the people here might. But out in the real world anyone in my circles who tries to promote such an idea will be laughed at. Because all the peer reviewed evidence is that it has come about quite naturally - not through any laboratory.

If you believe otherwise, then you're bang into the conspiracies again. And if you're into them, then there is no debate to be had.

Exactly. Experience demonstrates that those who buy into conspiracy theories aren't interested in the facts because the facts tend to be boring. They're not sensational enough to tickle their fancy. 

[other one]

2 hours ago, NotAllThere said:

This isn't the case. Well - most of the people here might. But out in the real world anyone in my circles who tries to promote such an idea will be laughed at. Because all the peer reviewed evidence is that it has come about quite naturally - not through any laboratory.

If you believe otherwise, then you're bang into the conspiracies again. And if you're into them, then there is no debate to be had.

When this first came out both New Zealand and Australia mapped the genome and there are several places where existing genes are duplicated to change the character of the virus so it will infect humans and extremely effectively....    It is statically impossible for nature to do that short of ten thousand years....     and it's not from a conspiracy place, just being observant from the very beginning and knowing where to look at the start before the covering up hits.....     No one that I am aware of in my circle thinks the virus is natural.   I'm surprised that you do.

 

[walla299]

41 minutes ago, other one said:

When this first came out both New Zealand and Australia mapped the genome and there are several places where existing genes are duplicated to change the character of the virus so it will infect humans and extremely effectively....    It is statically impossible for nature to do that short of ten thousand years....     and it's not from a conspiracy place, just being observant from the very beginning and knowing where to look at the start before the covering up hits.....     No one that I am aware of in my circle thinks the virus is natural.   I'm surprised that you do.

I'll add this: If I wanted a bio-weapon that would create utter chaos within my opposite's camp Covid would be a very good candidate - especially if I didn't want to kill off a large portion of a population. Things like Ebola can do that easily. The more we learn about Covid, the more it seems engineered to me, as in not natural. I don't have any "secret knowledge" either, just what we learned about biological and chemical warfare in the military.

And, yes, to answer the OP's question . . . anything can be weaponized if the developer is  determined or just twisted enough.

[other one]

1 hour ago, walla299 said:

I'll add this: If I wanted a bio-weapon that would create utter chaos within my opposite's camp Covid would be a very good candidate - especially if I didn't want to kill off a large portion of a population. Things like Ebola can do that easily. The more we learn about Covid, the more it seems engineered to me, as in not natural. I don't have any "secret knowledge" either, just what we learned about biological and chemical warfare in the military.

And, yes, to answer the OP's question . . . anything can be weaponized if the developer is  determined or just twisted enough.

I have several friends who have attracted this virus and though only two of them have died, those that survived have some serious problems...    some are old and some are not.   I don't think people are considering and documenting the damage the virus is doing to those that survive.  I only say that from personal experience with people I know...   I haven't read of anyone who id studying it, and maybe it's too soon for that.