Trump shot at rally

[Sower]

27 minutes ago, other one said:

I don't think posting my feelings about how this happened would align with the TOS so I'll just keep it to myself.

Well if you change your mind, and can phrase it to be allowable, I'd be interested.

Thanks OO...

[other one]

40 minutes ago, other one said:

It seems that the standing rule is not to kill anyone unless they have actually shot at the president.  Once the shooter fired, it took 2 to 3 seconds to take him out.  That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but I don't make the rules.

Dan Bonjino says this is not true.  If they saw the shooter with a gun in that situation, they should have killed him before they fired.

[Stewardofthemystery]

34 minutes ago, other one said:

I was told that the Secret Service had the shooter in their sights for nearly two minutes before the shooter shot but could not get approval to take him out.  It seems that the standing rule is not to kill anyone unless they have actually shot at the president.  Once the shooter fired, it took 2 to 3 seconds to take him out.  That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but I don't make the rules.

I don't think posting my feelings about how this happened would align with the TOS so I'll just keep it to myself.

I believe that story about the Secret Service sniper waiting for approval has been debunked.  They said they have orders to shoot a gunman on sight without asking for orders.

But it still does not make sense why the police did not communicate that there was a gun man reported by bystanders 2 minutes before the shooting.  How hard would it have been to get on the radio and sound off a warning that it was reported there was a gunman on the roof?  It does not make sense.

[farouk]

40 minutes ago, John Hancock said:

MSM News is programming you with their false narrative

Here is the truth about the fake Trump assassination:

Max Malone - It is looking like a deep state fake

Tim Truth- Photographers repositioned RIGHT BEFORE Shots Fired

Tim Truth- Was Trump Assassination Attempt A HOAX?

WAKE UP CALL- Iconic Photos Of Trump For The Mass Hypnosis!

"This is now the 4th Christian Forum that I've joined (all within the last month). The 1st three were filled with ANGRY debate."

@John Hancock

Do you feel that sometimes debate can be fueled by highly controversial assertions backed by very little firm evidence?

Edited July 15, 2024 by farouk

[farouk]

Hi @Marilyn C You see things maybe from an Australian perspective.

So what do you make of the conspiracy theory that President Trump's injury was all part of a some clever plot?

I'm sure that if strongly enough asserted it might be likewise possible to "prove" that Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt's death in 1967 was as a result of a rogue CIA submarine effort to cause a depended upon ally to be kidnapped underwater while Mr Holt was swimming off the Victorian coast.

(It never ceases to amaze me how some ppl will prefer to believe a far-fetched conspiracy rather than a lot of facts as widely reported.)

Edited July 15, 2024 by farouk

[Marilyn C]

13 minutes ago, farouk said:

Hi @Marilyn C You see things maybe from an Australian perspective.

So what do you make of the conspiracy theory that President Trump's injury was all part of a some clever plot?

I'm sure that if strongly enough asserted it might be likewise possible to "prove" that Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt's death in 1967 was as a result of a rogue CIA submarine effort to cause a depended upon ally to be kidnapped underwater while Mr Holt was swimming off the Victorian coast.

(It never ceases to amaze me how some ppl will prefer to believe a far-fetched conspiracy rather than a lot of facts as widely reported.)

Hi farouk,

True or not doesn`t matter, the whole `bells and whistles` are fake anyway. Man`s system is a sham and those involved play the game. 

The best way to bring in the New World Order, the great reset, is to have division, cause conflict. Then everything breaks down and the elite can bring in their answer - till God deals with the whole shebang.

 

[Marathoner]

24 minutes ago, farouk said:

Hi @Marilyn C You see things maybe from an Australian perspective.

So what do you make of the conspiracy theory that President Trump's injury was all part of a some clever plot?

I'm sure that if strongly enough asserted it might be likewise possible to "prove" that Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt's death in 1967 was as a result of a rogue CIA submarine effort to cause a depended upon ally to be kidnapped underwater while Mr Holt was swimming off the Victorian coast.

(It never ceases to amaze me how some ppl will prefer to believe a far-fetched conspiracy rather than a lot of facts as widely reported.)

Indeed. To further erode various conspiracies, President Biden ordered Secret Service protection for RFK Jr., another presidential candidate. That doesn't fit pet theories that the Democratic party had something to do with the horrible attack at the Trump rally that claimed the life of someone in the crowd. I also don't buy that the shooting was a "false flag" either. Men are fully capable of carrying out horrendous evil on their own without assistance. 

[farouk]

6 minutes ago, 1to3 said:

Thomas Matthew Crooks

Was in several BLACKROCK Commercials over the

past few years.

HMMMMM

So you really think BlackRock paid him to do it? If by some wild and obscure reason some huge corporation decided it was in its warped interests to be behind an assassination attempt of such a monstrous nature, then wouldn't they have arranged for a really professional hit squad to attempt it? not an inexperienced kid fresh out of college who couldn't even vote at the last Presidential election............

[dad2]

4 hours ago, Stewardofthemystery said:

I believe that story about the Secret Service sniper waiting for approval has been debunked.  They said they have orders to shoot a gunman on sight without asking for orders.

But it still does not make sense why the police did not communicate that there was a gun man reported by bystanders 2 minutes before the shooting.  How hard would it have been to get on the radio and sound off a warning that it was reported there was a gunman on the roof?  It does not make sense.

Source of 'debunking?

[dad2]

57 minutes ago, farouk said:

So you really think BlackRock paid him to do it? If by some wild and obscure reason some huge corporation decided it was in its warped interests to be behind an assassination attempt of such a monstrous nature, then wouldn't they have arranged for a really professional hit squad to attempt it? not an inexperienced kid fresh out of college who couldn't even vote at the last Presidential election............

The association would be the important thing there. Not that some kid was paid. It is known that some people can be used by various techniques and drugs etc. There is also the question of whether there was another shooter