Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  5.73
  • Reputation:   9,978
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

You know, there's protocol for pardoning and commuting sentences. You'd think Bush could have at least followed that (i.e. waiting till the appeals process was over). Nope.

Yeah, or he could wait until he gets paid for the pardon, like Bill Clinton did on numerous occasions.

Careful, Marnie, the cliche police will take exception to mentioning Clinton! :21:

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1,022
  • Topics Per Day:  0.15
  • Content Count:  39,193
  • Content Per Day:  5.73
  • Reputation:   9,978
  • Days Won:  78
  • Joined:  10/01/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

What Clinton did or did not do is NOT RELEVANT.

You mentioned precedent. He did perjure himself and was not punished.

Perhaps we could mention Sandy "I didn't know they were in my underwear" Burger.

:21:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  138
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,997
  • Content Per Day:  0.60
  • Reputation:   19
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/13/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

What Clinton did or did not do is NOT RELEVANT.

You mentioned precedent. He did perjure himself and was not punished.

Perhaps we could mention Sandy "I didn't know they were in my underwear" Burger.

Shalom,

OMGOODNESS, this is SO funny!! Marnie, you crack me up! :emot-handshake::thumbsup:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  138
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  3,997
  • Content Per Day:  0.60
  • Reputation:   19
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/13/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

You know, there's protocol for pardoning and commuting sentences. You'd think Bush could have at least followed that (i.e. waiting till the appeals process was over). Nope.

I would argue that Libby shouldn't have been required to go to jail till his appeals were exhausted. The only thing I am sorry for is that Bush didn't issue a full pardon. Libby was not guilty of leaking information. Supposedly he was convicted of perjury because the jury didn't believe him when he claimed he couldn't recall certain past events. I personally don't believe he did anything wrong, but was being made a scape goat because Bush's enemies were determined to find some type of crime against someone in the administration in reference to the Valerie Plame situation. My advise to anyone in a similar position is to plead the 5th even if you are innocent. You may come off looking guilty in the eyes of some people, but so what? They won't be able to convict you of perjury.

:emot-handshake:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  30
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,234
  • Content Per Day:  0.16
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/17/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/10/1987

Posted

I wasn't talking about precedent, I was talking about rules. The president is not supposed to be able to commute sentences unless all other options have been exhausted - i.e. Bush should have waited until the appeals process was over, at least.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  21
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,009
  • Content Per Day:  0.28
  • Reputation:   100
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  09/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

You know, there's protocol for pardoning and commuting sentences. You'd think Bush could have at least followed that (i.e. waiting till the appeals process was over). Nope.

Yeah, or he could wait until he gets paid for the pardon, like Bill Clinton did on numerous occasions.

Careful, Marnie, the cliche police will take exception to mentioning Clinton! :emot-handshake:

:thumbsup: Because blaming Clinton is LESS cliche then what I said. :thumbsup: As for the relevance of Clinton, you may has well started discussing whether you considered a Unicycle furniture.

(5 points to who gets that reference.)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

What Clinton did or did not do is NOT RELEVANT.

You mentioned precedent. He did perjure himself and was not punished.

Perhaps we could mention Sandy "I didn't know they were in my underwear" Burger.

Shalom,

OMGOODNESS, this is SO funny!! Marnie, you crack me up! :taped::thumbsup:

:emot-hug: Well, really! I mean, think about this. Clinton gets contributions from Mark Rich's wife, then pardons him. He gets donations for his library from a couple of other people and he pardons them. He pardons the husband of a client of one his lawyer cronies, but who brings that up? Clinton perjures himself (whether or not you think what he did was all that serious) and does he get fined? No. Sandy Burger burgles the Library of Congress (was it?) and makes off with a bunch of documents. Does he get punished? No. Democrats all over the country signed up dead people to vote for their candidates. What ever happened to them? Nothing.

So, if you are Democrat you are above the law in this country, apparently.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.16
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

Posted
I personally don't believe he did anything wrong, but was being made a scape goat because Bush's enemies were determined to find some type of crime against someone in the administration in reference to the Valerie Plame situation.

The same way they viciously savaged Newt and Delay, only much moreso with them, and will do with any rising star in the Republican party. I know Libby wasn't one of these, but it's just their MO. If they can bring down any Republican, or make the administration look bad in any way, they will, and they won't let up til they get the job done.

Any Texans remember what Ronnie Earl tried to do to Kay Baily Hutchison? He's the same one who went after Delay, I think.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.16
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

Posted
Sandy Burger burgles the Library of Congress (was it?) and makes off with a bunch of documents. Does he get punished? No. Democrats all over the country signed up dead people to vote for their candidates. What ever happened to them? Nothing.

So, if you are Democrat you are above the law in this country, apparently.

What Sandy Burglar did was very serious and very dangerous for the country, and he did it at Clinton's bidding. But I hardly saw a peep about it on the news.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I personally don't believe he did anything wrong, but was being made a scape goat because Bush's enemies were determined to find some type of crime against someone in the administration in reference to the Valerie Plame situation.

The same way they viciously savaged Newt and Delay, only much moreso with them, and will do with any rising star in the Republican party. I know Libby wasn't one of these, but it's just their MO. If they can bring down any Republican, or make the administration look bad in any way, they will, and they won't let up til they get the job done.

Any Texans remember what Ronnie Earl tried to do to Kay Baily Hutchison? He's the same one who went after Delay, I think.

I agree. Dick Armitage outted Plame, and the whole case against Scooter was political, nothing more. IMO, the Bush Administration handled this poorly from the beginning and should be ashamed of themselves. He deserved better. We expect this kind of thing from Democrats, but I thought the GOP had more class.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 14 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...