HisFirst Posted December 6, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 21 Topic Count: 315 Topics Per Day: 0.11 Content Count: 3,491 Content Per Day: 1.26 Reputation: 2,582 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/25/2016 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 6, 2016 1 hour ago, MightyinHim said: I am so glad someone has done this. Lots of people are naming their boys with surnames. We have all sorts, like Henderson Hutchinson, Tyler etc. I feel so sorry for children with strange names. They are at a disadvantage from the start. I remember when the singer Craig David was big - there was a big deal made about his surname being a first name.... I see Justice is on the list - I personally know a Justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SisterActs2 Posted December 6, 2016 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 23 Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,000 Content Per Day: 0.37 Reputation: 1,655 Days Won: 1 Joined: 11/27/2016 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/08/1950 Share Posted December 6, 2016 (edited) Yes, I guess at the end of the day it is a bit silly really. A lot of stuff has no eternal significance. Actually I know of a couple of children named Justice. We have a system for errant children called "Juvenile Justice". Just imagine someone with this name ending up in "Juvy" as they call it. Edited December 6, 2016 by MightyinHim The word "image" was meant to be "imagine". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 6, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted December 6, 2016 I don't understand how the state can dictate what citizens can name their children. I thought Australia was a democracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 6, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted December 6, 2016 11 hours ago, MightyinHim said: I am so glad someone has done this. Lots of people are naming their boys with surnames. We have all sorts, like Henderson Hutchinson, Tyler etc. I feel so sorry for children with strange names. They are at a disadvantage from the start. You're okay with your government banning names??? That is government out of control. What's next? Banning certain books or religions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwikphilly Posted December 6, 2016 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 96 Topic Count: 307 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 18,136 Content Per Day: 4.63 Reputation: 27,816 Days Won: 327 Joined: 08/03/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted December 6, 2016 I'm just wondering how we are to Glorifiy God in this conversation.....in other words,why is it in the inner Court,perhaps Humor Section is more appropriate or anywhere in the Upper Room? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyAngeL Posted December 6, 2016 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 23 Topic Count: 155 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 7,464 Content Per Day: 1.02 Reputation: 8,810 Days Won: 57 Joined: 03/30/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/12/1952 Share Posted December 6, 2016 38 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: You're okay with your government banning names??? That is government out of control. What's next? Banning certain books or religions? Could have been closer then you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SisterActs2 Posted December 6, 2016 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 23 Topic Count: 7 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,000 Content Per Day: 0.37 Reputation: 1,655 Days Won: 1 Joined: 11/27/2016 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/08/1950 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Sorry people. I probably shouldn't have become involved in this trivia. Much worse, and of eternal significance, is the fact that the Victorian government is now considering a probable conscience vote on voluntary euthanasia next year. Where is this heading? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted December 7, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted December 7, 2016 4 hours ago, MightyinHim said: Sorry people. I probably shouldn't have become involved in this trivia. Much worse, and of eternal significance, is the fact that the Victorian government is now considering a probable conscience vote on voluntary euthanasia next year. Where is this heading? In my opinion, not a good one. Are the Australian people in favor of this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebula Posted December 7, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 10 Topic Count: 5,823 Topics Per Day: 0.76 Content Count: 45,870 Content Per Day: 5.95 Reputation: 1,897 Days Won: 83 Joined: 03/22/2003 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/19/1970 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Looking at the list of names, though, I can appreciate why there would be a ban on them. The names on the list are not "ridiculous" ones, but represent titles. That could be problematic in certain situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisFirst Posted December 7, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 21 Topic Count: 315 Topics Per Day: 0.11 Content Count: 3,491 Content Per Day: 1.26 Reputation: 2,582 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/25/2016 Status: Offline Author Share Posted December 7, 2016 14 hours ago, kwikphilly said: I'm just wondering how we are to Glorifiy God in this conversation.....in other words,why is it in the inner Court,perhaps Humor Section is more appropriate or anywhere in the Upper Room? Sorry Kwik - my bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts