What would u do here

[Guest Judas Machabeus]

15 hours ago, creativemechanic said:

That's a tough one. It speaks to the type of person he is/was. It would also depend on whether it was just an admission  of guilt or a confession of sin. Admission of guilt.... no vote. Confession of sin..... I would vote for him.

[Anonymous Aristotle]

12 hours ago, Yowm said:

The lesser of two evils is my policy.

That leaves one evil. 

[missmuffet]

That would depend on other qualities I would observe in the candidate. One extra marital affair would probably not affect my vote if after observing the person for awhile I found the person to have integrity and character.

[LadyKay]

20 hours ago, creativemechanic said:

Yeah. I would. Unless he is running for "Best Husband Of The Year Award." 

[LadyKay]

6 hours ago, The_Patriot2017 said:

I think if we voted in more Godly Pastors as politicians, we would have fewer problems lol. 

Well that would make things interesting. But can you really regulate righteousness? 

Well now I'm thinking. 

[The_Patriot21]

5 hours ago, LadyKay said:

Well that would make things interesting. But can you really regulate righteousness? 

Well now I'm thinking. 

most Godly pastors would not regulate righteousness....thats the thing most people don't get. There is a huge difference between governing righteously, and governing righteousness. One, they govern with God in their hearts, honestly, and justly. the other, they attempt to force everyone else to believe the way they do. The RCC of the middle ages, attempted to regulate righteousness, they forced people to believe their way or else. Our founding fathers, most of whom were solid christians, governed righteously, in that while most were active members of their church and could recite the Bible forwards and backwards, set up a government where people could believe whatever religion they wanted, without fear of reprisal from the government.

[JTC]

If he's done a good job then yes. If he embezzled money then no. Most people have casual sex. It's not even considered wrong anymore.

[Anonymous Aristotle]

21 hours ago, Yowm said:

Yes. The Lesser of two.

Evil is still evil. There's no degree system for Christians. 

[Willa]

11 hours ago, JTC said:

If he's done a good job then yes. If he embezzled money then no. Most people have casual sex. It's not even considered wrong anymore.

God still calls it fornication and says there will be none who practice casual sex in heaven.    

At one time most of the 10 commandments were written as civil laws.  People didn't cuss in public either because you could be fined for it.  Adultry was illegal as well, and on both Saturday and Sunday most stores were required to close.  There were laws against practicing witchcraft.

So now it is all wide open with no laws regulating bad behavior.  Do you thinK the world has become a better place with the "free speech" and "free sex".   Is it right in God's eyes because everyone is doing it.  It causes people who were raised by TV shows to adapt amoral behavior as the norm.  Is that making the world a better place?   Where there is no law, everyone does what is right in his own eyes and "everyone is doing it" or "if it feels good, do it" become the slippery slide to hell. 

I expect my husband to be an example of moral integrity for our sons.  How much more we should expect our president to be an example of moral integrity for our nation.

However, the opposition party runs on a platform that wishes to destroy biblical moral integrity.  For years they have shouted "You can't legislate morality" and they have turned our right of freedom of religion into freedom FROM religion. Now they have legislated immorality and encourage discrimination against those he adhere to biblical principles in the name of being politically correct.   In the same way that Baalam told the infidels how to bring down Israel, satan has told the opposition party how to destroy our country from within.

[Anonymous Aristotle]

2 hours ago, Yowm said:

I have degrees when it comes to human conduct. For example, I consider an act of raping a 9 yr. old and then dismembering her in front of her mother a more evil act than a man committing adultery with another's wife. Sure they are both sin and deserving of hell but in practical terms I would choose the candidate guilty of the latter over the former, i.e. the lesser of two evils.

Does God?