Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  890
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   1,008
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/07/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I guess the reason you won't find the word 'begotten' in modern translations (such as the NRSV) is that it is no longer in everyday use. We have other ways of saying the same thing.


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  88
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   89
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/24/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)

I'm going to drop this verse in case they haven't already:

 

Acts 13:33: this he has fulfilled to us their children by raising Jesus; as also it is written in the second psalm, 'Thou art my Son, today I have begotten thee.'

 

 

Edited by BlueMinou

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.12
  • Reputation:   6,614
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
On 7/20/2016 at 1:02 AM, Deborah_ said:

I guess the reason you won't find the word 'begotten' in modern translations (such as the NRSV) is that it is no longer in everyday use. We have other ways of saying the same thing.

The only problem with that is that *only begotten* is the only legitimate way of translating monogenes, unless it is *uniquely begotten*. But the modern versions misrepresent this with *only Son*.  They do not say *uniquely begotten*. 

The begetting within the Godhead has no relationship to human begetting, but indicated an eternal and loving Father-Son relationship.


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  890
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   1,008
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/07/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 hour ago, Ezra said:

The only problem with that is that *only begotten* is the only legitimate way of translating monogenes, unless it is *uniquely begotten*. But the modern versions misrepresent this with *only Son*.  They do not say *uniquely begotten*. 

The begetting within the Godhead has no relationship to human begetting, but indicated an eternal and loving Father-Son relationship.

Fine, but how would you explain the word 'begotten' to someone who doesn't understand what it means?  


  • Group:  Graduated to Heaven
  • Followers:  57
  • Topic Count:  1,479
  • Topics Per Day:  0.19
  • Content Count:  10,320
  • Content Per Day:  1.34
  • Reputation:   12,327
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  04/15/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/05/1951

Posted
13 minutes ago, Deborah_ said:

begotten

It is only wiki, so consider the source, but this might be  more info that some want to wade through:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monogenēs


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.12
  • Reputation:   6,614
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
35 minutes ago, Deborah_ said:

Fine, but how would you explain the word 'begotten' to someone who doesn't understand what it means?  

1. The Godhead cannot be *understood* with human logic and reasoning. Therefore this is a matter of faith in God.

2. Divine revelation can be either accepted or rejected. One can either believe God or disbelieve Him.

3. It is impossible to explain a Father-Son relationship which does not involve a mother.

4. Jesus is the Word of God and also Truth. Therefore we must accept what the Bible says as true, regardless of how logical or illogical it sounds.


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  890
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   1,008
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/07/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
49 minutes ago, Deborah_ said:

Fine, but how would you explain the word 'begotten' to someone who doesn't understand what it means?  

My dictionary gives two definitions of 'beget' : to cause, or to be the father of. 

Would we say that the Son was in some way  'caused'? I don't think so. And the word 'son' implies a parent, so to add the word 'begotten' is a bit of a tautology. The force of the word monogenes must therefore be on 'only' (as when applied to Isaac).

12 minutes ago, Ezra said:

1. The Godhead cannot be *understood* with human logic and reasoning. Therefore this is a matter of faith in God.

2. Divine revelation can be either accepted or rejected. One can either believe God or disbelieve Him.

3. It is impossible to explain a Father-Son relationship which does not involve a mother.

4. Jesus is the Word of God and also Truth. Therefore we must accept what the Bible says as true, regardless of how logical or illogical it sounds.

This does nothing to explain the meaning of 'begotten'. We may not be able to understand the nature of God, but that is no excuse for making His word impenetrable. The first readers of the New Testament knew exactly what 'monogenes' meant, so why does it have to be a mystery for us?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  16
  • Topic Count:  134
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  8,142
  • Content Per Day:  2.12
  • Reputation:   6,614
  • Days Won:  20
  • Joined:  11/02/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 hour ago, Deborah_ said:

My dictionary gives two definitions of 'beget' : to cause, or to be the father of. 

Dictionaries are worthless when trying to penetrate spiritual verities. As I said, Christians are not obligated to *explain* Divine mysteries. 

We are called upon to simply proclaim the Gospel (which includes the fact that the Lord Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God -- being God Himself -- who became Man for our redemption). Paul told the Athenians that He was the *Unknown God* which they acknowledged, since mankind cannot really comprehend the Godhead.

 


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  890
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   1,008
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/07/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Dear Ezra, you are completely missing my point. We are not trying to 'explain a divine mystery' here, we are simply trying to communicate using the words of the modern English language - just as the apostles preached and wrote in everyday Greek.

What is the point of proclaiming the gospel in words that people do not understand? Why use Christian 'jargon'? If someone is reading the Bible and comes across a word that they don't know, why should they not look it up in a dictionary? And if you are using a word with a different meaning from the everyday dictionary definition, then surely you should be able to explain what the difference is.


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  96
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  19,046
  • Content Per Day:  4.43
  • Reputation:   28,634
  • Days Won:  331
  • Joined:  08/03/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Blessings Deborah

     I think the easiest way to explain to someone what "begotten" means,if speaking about what it means in Gods Word it to show the comparisons as we did the very first replies here,the definitions translated from the original languages,not a dictionary,,,,,,,,,the translation is "One of a Kind" not merely only Son,,,,,this is why I compared it to the ONLY other time this transliteration is used in the entire Bible & that is to describe Isaac,Abrahams "chosen son",,,,,,,so it is quite different than just saying I (Kwik) had one begotten......does that help?                                 To God be the Glory                                               With love-in Christ,Kwik

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...