Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  18
  • Topic Count:  165
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  3,997
  • Content Per Day:  1.34
  • Reputation:   2,607
  • Days Won:  15
  • Joined:  04/29/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 minute ago, Running Gator said:

That was the point of the comment.

Your post came in at same time as mine, I didn't see yours because we must have posted at same time. :) 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.09
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.75
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
53 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

What is judgmental about someone telling a girl in church that dressing provocatively is inappropriate?   That is not judgmental. There is no biblical case for saying that it is judgemental.

You said it was judgmental, so I addressed that.   I don't think anyone can make the case that it is judgmental to expect people to dress appropriately for Church.

 

Oh dear. It seems I have caused an uproar once  again with what I thought was nothing more then my  simple advice. Well first off I was not aware I was suppose to be  addressing people in church.( I thought I said that) I was making a general statement about how people dress. I thought I had made that clear but I guess it was not clear enough. 

Quote

I don't think anyone can make the case that it is judgmental to expect people to dress appropriately for Church.

I think it is but like I said I understand if you see things differently then I do. I wasn't really trying to make a case of anything. Just my advice. You don't have to follow my advice if you don't want too. 

 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.09
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.75
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
56 minutes ago, Neighbor said:

Now "we" worry and tsk tsk  about attire at church, as though it is different from attire elsewhere. Is it proper to be immodest anywhere  at any time in general public situations?

That is an interesting point. :39:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.09
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.75
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

I think everyone knows what modesty means, don't you?  I mean, most intelligent people, whether they are believers or not, understand the basic concept of modesty and what modest attire looks like.

Well for me I see nothing at all  immodest about a women in a 2  piece swim suite. Back in my younger days I use to wear one. My bottom and top was covered so I did not think it to be an issue. I personally do think that thong swim suits are immodest. They look uncomfortable too.  My point is is that  everyone has their own measure for what is and what is not immodest.  My grandmother thought shorts of any kind was immodest. Was she wrong to think that? No. It was just her measure of what she consider immodest. So this is why I say this is a personal issue between you and God. 

Edited by LadyKay

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  2,155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.47
  • Content Count:  51,434
  • Content Per Day:  11.33
  • Reputation:   31,572
  • Days Won:  240
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
13 minutes ago, LadyKay said:

Well for me I see nothing at all  immodest about a women in a 2  piece swim suite. Back in my younger days I use to wear one. My bottom and top was covered so I did not think it to be an issue. I personally do think that thong swim suits are immodest. They look uncomfortable too.  My point is is that  everyone has their own measure for what is and what is not immodest.  My grandmother thought shorts of any kind was immodest. Was she wrong to think that? No. It was just her measure of what she consider immodest. So this is why I say this is a personal issue between you and God. 

Years ago when I wore a bikini I did not think there was anything wrong with it. Since then I have changed. My outlook on many things have changed.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  138
  • Content Per Day:  0.05
  • Reputation:   64
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/18/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
36 minutes ago, LadyKay said:

That is an interesting point. :39:

yes, interesting ....we are in 2017 and standards are polluted and we are all fallen...Lord Jesus said "what is that to you..."

Guest shiloh357
Posted
30 minutes ago, LadyKay said:

Well for me I see nothing at all  immodest about a women in a 2  piece swim suite. Back in my younger days I use to wear one. My bottom and top was covered so I did not think it to be an issue. I personally do think that thong swim suits are immodest. They look uncomfortable too.  My point is is that  everyone has their own measure for what is and what is not immodest.  My grandmother thought shorts of any kind was immodest. Was she wrong to think that? No. It was just her measure of what she consider immodest. So this is why I say this is a personal issue between you and God. 

I understand that.  But that's not the topic that was raised by the OP and it is not really the issue in this thread.  The issue is about modesty among followers of Jesus in a church setting and what constitutes appropriate attire for that setting.

Guest shiloh357
Posted
1 hour ago, Running Gator said:

If you took 100 people of varying ages and from different parts of the country and asked them their opinion of modest attire you would get 30 or 40 different versions of what modest dress is.

And what do you think those versions would include?  And how many of them would be committed followers of Jesus?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  21
  • Topic Count:  1,289
  • Topics Per Day:  0.41
  • Content Count:  16,811
  • Content Per Day:  5.39
  • Reputation:   10,538
  • Days Won:  9
  • Joined:  12/04/2016
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  03/03/1885

Posted
5 minutes ago, missmuffet said:

Years ago when I wore a bikini I did not think there was anything wrong with it. Since then I have changed. My outlook on many things have changed.

Funny, I bet no one thinks to wear a bikini at their baptism by immersion.

Just a stray thought. Should have left it straying.

I think I have become much like those ladies with the ounces of dusty rose perfume super saturating their flesh. Desensitized.  For I kinda get interested in the rather classy look of a woman  in the old  old movies where they wore lots of  fabric, but it was all positioned and worn well, with "style".  I haven't found much style  around Wally World where all my own attire is birthed. I used to find the Walmartian  look extrodinarily funny, gross but funny, now  not so much. For me  now, as a man,  to dress well is to wear socks, ankle length socks.  Soo, maybe I am not  much of a fashion expert anymore and should just happily do the share a germ meet and greet at worship with a  happy smile as I gaze off to the air conditioning vents to make sure the air is flowing well, even as the BTU's burn  with the energy of the holy kisses and handshakes and hugs.

Hmm, maybe modesty  is easily resolved with room  temperature controls- set the ac at 68 degrees and see what happens? 


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  35
  • Topic Count:  2,155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.47
  • Content Count:  51,434
  • Content Per Day:  11.33
  • Reputation:   31,572
  • Days Won:  240
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 hour ago, LadyKay said:

That is an interesting point. :39:

It is important for the born again Christian woman to remain in modest attire no matter where she is. Except in the privacy of her own home and with her husband.Women of the world dress any way they want. They are followers of Satan and he loves it.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...